In July 2008, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled in Coleman v Attridge Law (Case C-303/06) that the European prohibition of discrimination based on disabilities (Directive 2000/78) applies when the direct victim of discrimination is a person associated with the disabled person, such as a parent who is the primary carer for a disabled child. This decision has major implications for the scope and application of European anti-discrimination law, and in particular for the new anti-discrimination directives. Coleman raises questions relating to the complex relationship between paid work and caring. While being a case relating to disability discrimination, it has been heralded as a victory for carers. This article seeks to explain why and explore the extent to which this ruling reconstructs the concept of the worker as a subject whose caring relationships are recognized and valued. It begins by setting the judgment within the wider debates relating to care and work before considering the significance of the ruling for ECJ anti-discrimination jurisprudence. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of the ruling and its aftermath in the UK, particularly for contemporary feminist analysis of the relationship between caring and paid work.
Attridge Law and S. Law v Coleman [2007] ICR 654 EAT
2.
Carpenter v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-60/00) [2002] ECR I-6279
3.
Coleman v Attridge Law (C-303/06) [2008] ECR I-05603
4.
Commission v France (C-212/86) [1988] ECR 6315
5.
Drake v CAO (C-150/85) [1986] ECR 1995
6.
EBR Attridge Law (1) Law (2) v Coleman (2009) Appeal No. UKEAT/0071/09/JOJ
7.
Griesmar v Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie and another (C-366/99) [2001] ECR I-9383
8.
Hofmann v Barmer Ersatzkasse (C-184/83) [1984] ECR 3047
9.
Lommers v Minister van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij (C-479/99) [2002] ECR I-2891
10.
Mangold v Rüdiger Helm (C-144/04) [2005] ECR I-9981
11.
Maruko v Versorgungsanstalt der deutschen BühnenMaruko (C-267/6) [2008] ECR I-1757
12.
Nold v Commission (C-4/73) [1974] ECR 491
13.
Showboat Entertainment Centre Ltd v Owens [1984] 1All ER 836 EAT
14.
Weathersfield v Sargeant [1999] IRLR 94
15.
Zuechner v Handelskrankenkasse (Ersatzkasse) Bremen (C- 77/95) [1996] ECR I-5689
16.
Barbera M. ( 2002) Not the same: The judicial role in the community anti-discrimination law context. Industrial Law Review31(1): 82-91.
17.
Carers UK ( 2002) Valuing Carers: Calculating the Value of Unpaid Care. London: Carers UK.
18.
Cigarini L. ( 2006) Quello che dicono le lavoratrici. Quaderni di Via Dogana, special issue no 68/ 2004, Tre donne e due uomini parlano del lavoro che cambia . 54-62.
19.
Cigarini L. ( 2008) Un’altra narrazione. In: Buttarelli A and Giardini F (eds) Il pensiero dell’esperienza. Milan: Baldini Castaldi Dalai Editore, 167-174.
20.
Conaghan J. ( 1999) Feminism and labour law: Contesting the terrain. In Morris A and O’Donnell T (eds) Feminist Perspectives on Employment Law. London: Cavendish, 13-41.
21.
Conaghan J. ( 2002) Women, work, and family: A British revolution? In: Conaghan J, Fischl, RM , and Klare K (eds) Labour Law in an Era of Globalization. Oxford: OUP, 53-73.
22.
Cook T. ( 2007) The History of the Carers’ Movement. London: Carers UK.
23.
Costello C. ( 2003) Gender equalities and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In: Hervey T and Kenner J (eds) Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Legal Perspective. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart , 111-138.
24.
Eriksson A. ( 2009) European Court of Justice: Broadening the scope of European nondiscrimination law. International Journal of Constitutional Law7: 731-753.
25.
Ertman MM and Williams JC (eds) (2005) Rethinking Commodification . New York and London: New York University Press.
26.
Fredman S. ( 2002) Discrimination Law. Oxford: OUP.
27.
Fredman S. ( 2008) Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
Fudge J and Owens R (eds) (2006) Precarious Work, Women and the New Economy. Oxford: Hart Publishing .
29.
Hoskyns C. and Rai SM ( 2007) Recasting the global political economy: Counting women’s unpaid work. New Political Economy12(3): 297-317.
30.
Lacey N. ( 1987) Legislation against sex discrimination: Questions from a feminist perspective. Journal of Law and Society14: 411-421.
31.
Lacey N. ( 2004) Feminist legal theory and the rights of women. In: Knopp K (ed.) Gender and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13-55.
32.
Leczykiewicz D. ( 2008) Why do the European Court of Justice judges need legal concepts? European Law Journal14(6): 773-786.
33.
Lewis J. ( 2009) Work-Family Balance, Gender and Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
34.
Lewis J. and Giullari S. ( 2005) The adult worker model family, gender equality and care: The search for new policy principles and the possibilities and problems of a capabilities approach. Economy and Society34(1): 76-104.
35.
Masselot A. and Caracciolo Di Torella E. ( 2001) Pregnancy, maternity and the organisation of family life: An attempt to classify the case-law of the Court of Justice. European Law Review26(3): 239-260.
36.
McCrudden C. and Kountouros H. ( 2006) Human Rights and European Equality Law. University of Oxford Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Working Paper 8/2006.
37.
McGlynn C. ( 2007) Families and European Union law. In: Probert R (ed.) Family Life and the Law: Under One Roof. London: Ashgate, 247-258.
38.
Moffat G. ( 2007) Work-life balance and employment law: Cultural change or mission impossible? In: Probert R (ed.) Family Life and the Law: Under One Roof. London: Ashgate, 135-158.
39.
Naffine N. ( 2002) In praise of legal feminism. Legal Studies22(1):71-101.
40.
O’Donovan K. and Szyszczak E. ( 1988) Equality and Sex Discrimination Law. Oxford: Blackwell.
41.
Pilgerstorfer M. and Forshaw S. ( 2008) Transferred discrimination inEuropean law. Industrial Law Journal37(4): 389-393.
42.
Ramalho M doRosário Palma(2009) Reconciling family and professional life and the gender equality principle in employment. European Gender Equality Law Review2: 7-14.
43.
Razavi S. ( 2007) Does paid work enhance women’s access to welfare? Evidence from selected industrializing countries. Social Politics14(1): 58-92.
44.
Repetto G. ( 2010) Discrimination against homosexuals and ‘integration by reasonableness’: Suggestions from the Maruko case. In: Niccolai S and Ruggiu I (eds) Dignity in Change: Exploring the Constitutional Potential of EU Gender and Anti-Discrimination Law. Fiesole: EPAP, 137-150.
45.
Rossilli MR ( 2009) Introduzione. In: Rossilli MR (ed.) I diritti delle donne nell’Unione Europea. Cittadine Migranti Schiave. pp. xi-xx.
46.
Somek A. ( 1999) A constitution for anti-discrimination: Exploring the vanguard moment of Community law. European Law Journal5(3): 243-271.
47.
Tronto J. ( 1994) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
48.
Vickerstaff S., Loretto W., Milne A., Alden E., Billings J. and White P. ( 2009) Employment Support for Carers. London : Department for Work & Pensions.
49.
Villa P. ( 2009) La Strategia Europea per l’Occupazione e le pari opportunità tra uomini e donnein. In: Rossilli MR (ed.) I diritti delle donne nell’Unione Europea. Cittadine Migranti Schiave. Rome: Ediesse, 163-198.
50.
Waddington L. ( 1997) The Court of Justice fails to show its caring face. European Law Review22(6): 587-593.
51.
Waddington L. ( 2009) Case C-303/06 Coleman v Attridge Law and Steve Law. Common Market Law Review45: 665-681.
52.
White JA and Tronto JC ( 2004) Political practices of care: Needs and rights. Ratio Juris17: 425-453.
53.
Williams JC and Bornstein S. ( 2008) The evolution of ‘FReD’: Family responsibilities discrimination and developments in law of stereotyping and implicit bias. Hastings Law Journal59(6): 1311-1358.
