The constitutionalization of employment relations has been proposed as a possible response to the serious difficulties confronting workers and unions in an era of neo-liberalism and globalization. This article challenges this proposal on two grounds. First, ‘employment’ no longer serves as an appropriate platform for labour policy, and in any event is conceptually inappropriate for constitutionalization. And second, a survey of the multiple meanings and manifestations of ‘constitutionalization’ at the level of the nation state, the global economy and the enterprise reveals that this approach is unlikely to produce positive practical results for workers. Nonetheless, to think about the constitutionalization of employment relations is productive in the sense that it requires engagement with the pernicious problems of articulating a ‘new normal’ — a ‘new normativity’ — that represents a better balance between workers’ interests and those of employers.
Reference re: Weekly Rest in Industrial Undertakings Act (Can.) [1937] A.C. 326.
8.
R.W.D.S.U., Local 558 v Pepsi-Cola Canada Beverages (West) Ltd. [2002] 1 S.C.R. 156. [‘Pepsi-Cola’]
9.
Saskatchewan (Labour Relations Board) v John East Iron Works Ltd. [1948] JCJ No. 5, [1949] AC 134. [‘John East’]
10.
Tomko v Nova Scotia (Labour Relations Board) [1975] S.C.J. No. 111, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 112.
11.
Toronto Electric Commissioners v Snider [1925] A.C. 394 (P.C.)
12.
Weber v Ontario Hydro [1995] 2 S.C.R. 929.
13.
Adams RJ ( 2006) Canada’s Failure to Protect and Promote Collective Bargaining as a Human Right. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
14.
Allan TRS ( 2002) Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
15.
Arthurs H. ( 1967) Developing industrial citizenship: a challenge for Canada’s second century. Canadian Bar Review45: 786-830.
16.
Arthurs H. ( 1996) The New Economy and the Demise of Industrial Citizenship . Kingston, ON: IRC Press.
17.
Arthurs H. ( 1998) Globalization of the mind: Canadian elites and the restructuring of legal fields. Canadian Journal of Law & Society12: 219-246.
18.
Arthurs H. ( 1999) Constitutionalizing neo-conservatism and regional economic integration: TINA x 2. In: Courchene TJ (ed.) Room to Manoeuvre? Globalization and Policy Convergence . Kingston, ON: McGill-Queen’s University Press , 17-74.
19.
Arthurs H. ( 2000) The new economy and the new legality: industrial citizenship and the future of labour arbitration. 7 Canadian Labour & Employment Law Journal, 7: 45-63.
20.
Arthurs H. ( 2002) Labor law scholarship: theCanadian case. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal23: 645-678.
21.
Arthurs H. ( 2005a) Corporate codes of conduct: profit, power and law in the global economy. In: Cragg W (ed.) Ethics Codes, Corporations and the Challenges of Globalization. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 51-74.
22.
Arthurs H. ( 2005b) Who’s afraid of globalization? The transformation of Canadian labour law. In Craig J and Lynk M (eds) Globalization and the Future of Labour Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 51-76.
23.
Arthurs H. ( 2006a) What immortal hand or eye? Who will redraw the boundaries of labour law? In: Davidov G and Langille B (eds) Boundaries and Frontiers of Labour Law: Goals and Means in the Regulation of Work. Oxford: Hart, 373-389.
24.
Arthurs H. ( 2006b) Federal Labour Standards Review (2006). Fairness at Work: Federal Labour Standards for the 21st Century. Gatineau, QC: Human Resources and Skills Development Canada (Arthurs Report).
25.
Arthurs H. ( 2007) Labour and the ‘real’ constitution . Cahiers du droit48: 43-64.
26.
Arthurs H.(2009) The hollowing out of corporate Canada: implications for transnational labor law, policy and practice. Buffalo Law Review57: 781-801.
27.
Arthurs H. ( 2010) Extraterritoriality by other means: how labor law sneaks across borders, conquers minds and controls workplaces abroad. Stanford Law & Policy Review (forthcoming).
28.
Arthurs H. and Arnold B. ( 2005) Does the Charter matter?Review of Constitutional Studies11: 37-117.
29.
Arthurs H. and Mummé C. ( 2007) From governance to political economy: insights from a study of relations between corporations and workers, Osgoode Hall Law Journal45: 439-470.
30.
Baker MB ( 2001) Tightening the toothless vise: codes of conduct and the American multinational enterprise. Wisconsin International Law Journal20: 89-142.
31.
Barnard C. and Deakin S. ( 2001) Constitutionalising labour law - the British experience . Available at: http://web.unife.it/facolta/giurisprudenza/lavorodispari/Redazione/BarnDeakUK.htm (accessed 7 September 2009).
32.
Beatty DM ( 1987) Putting the Charter to Work: Designing a Constitutional Labour Code. Kingston, ON: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
33.
Bédard M. ( 1997) Chief Actuary’s Report on Employment Insurance Contribution Rates for 1998. Hull: HRDC. Cited in Campeau G. ( 2005) From UI to EI: Waging War on the Welfare State. Vancouver: UBC Press, at p. 165.
34.
Blackett A. ( 2001) Global governance, legal pluralism and the decentered state: a labor law critique of codes of corporate conduct. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies8: 401-448.
35.
Cavalluzzo P. ( 1986) Freedom of Association and the Right to Bargain Collectively . In: Weiler J and Elliot R (eds) Litigating the Values of a Nation. Toronto: Carswell, 189-210.
36.
Clark J. and Wedderburn KW ( 1987) Juridification - a universal trend? The British experience in labor law. In: Teubner G (ed.) Juridification of Social Spheres. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 163-190.
37.
Collins H. ( 2006) The protection of civil liberties in the workplace . Modern Law Review69: 619-631.
38.
Davies P, Ewing K and Freedland M (2007) (eds) EU Intervention in Domestic Labour Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
Davies P. and Freedland M. ( 1993) Labour Legislation and Public Policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
40.
Dickens L. and Neal AC ( 2006) Changing times, changing needs: Institutional development through three decades. In: Dickens L and Neal AC (eds) The Changing Institutional Face of British Employment Relations. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International, 1-12.
41.
Dukes R. ( 2008) Constitutionalising employment relations: Sinzheimer, Kahn-Freund and the role of labour law. Journal of Law and Society35: 341-363.
42.
Dukes R. ( 2009) Otto Kahn-Freund and collective laissez-faire: an edifice without a keystone?Modern Law Review72: 220-246.
43.
England G. ( 2006) The impact of the charter on individual employment law in Canada: rewriting an old story. Canadian Labour & Employment Law Journal13: 1-40.
44.
Ewing K. ( 1998a) The Human Rights Act and labour law. Industrial Law Journal27: 275-292.
45.
Ewing K. ( 1998b) The state and industrial relations: ‘collective laissez-faire’ revisited. Historical Studies in Industrial Relations5: 1-31.
46.
Fink L. ( 1987) Labor, liberty and the law: trade unionism and the problem of the American constitutional order. Journal of American History74: 904-925.
47.
Forbath W. ( 1991) Law and the Shaping of the American Labor Movement . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
Fudge D. ( 2006) Collective Bargaining in Canada: Human Rights Or Canadian Illusion. Black Point, NS: Fernwood Publishing.
49.
Fudge J. ( 2008) The supreme court of Canada and the right to bargain collectively: the implications of the health services and support case in Canada and beyond . Industrial Law Journal37: 25-48.
50.
Garner BA (ed.) (2004) ‘Constitution’ . In:Black’s Law Dictionary. St Paul, MN: Thomson West.
51.
Ginsberg T., Elkins Z. and Melton J. ( 2009) The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
Hogg PW ( 2007) Constitutional Law of Canada. Toronto : Thomson Carswell.
54.
Howse R. and Nicolaidis K. ( 2009) Enhancing WTO legitimacy: constitutionalisation or global subsidiarity?Governance16: 73-94.
55.
Kahn-Freund O. ( 1954) Legal framework. In: Flanders A and Clegg HA (eds) The System of Industrial Relations in Great Britain: Its History, Law and Institutions. Oxford: Blackwell . 42-127.
56.
Klare KE(1977/1978) Judicial deradicalization of the Wagner Act and the origins of modern legal consciousness, 1937-1941. Minnesota Law Review62: 265-340.
57.
Kolben K. ( 2010) The WTO distraction, Stanford Law and Policy Review (forthcoming).
58.
Langille B. ( 2002) Labour policy in Canada: new platform, new paradigm . Canadian Public Policy28: 132-142.
59.
Leigh I. and Masterman R. ( 2008) Making Rights Real: The Human Rights Act in its First Decade. London: Hart Publishing .
60.
Lewis R. ( 1979) Kahn-Freund and labour law: an outline critique . Industrial Law Journal8: 202-221.
61.
Newman WJ ( 2005) The principles of the rule of law and parliamentary sovereignty in constitutional theory and litigation. National Journal of Constitutional Law16: 175-296.
62.
O’Connor M. ( 2000) Labor’s role in the American corporate governance structure. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal22: 97-133.
63.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2008) Country note: Canada. In: Growing Unequal? Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries . Paris: OECD. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/document/4/0,3343,en_2649_33933_41460917_1_1_1_1,00.html#COUNTRY_NOTES (accessed 18 May 2010).
64.
Picher M. ( 1999/2000) Defining the scope of arbitration: the impact of Weber - an arbitrator’s perspective. In: Labour Arbitration Yearbook. Toronto: Lancaster House, 99-147.
65.
Pope J. ( 1997) Labor’s constitution of freedom. Yale Law Journal106: 941-1031.
66.
Raiser T. ( 1988) The theory of enterprise law in the Federal Republic of Germany. American Journal of Comparative Law36: 111-129.
67.
Sarra J. ( 1999) Corporate governance reform: recognition of workers’ equitable investment in the firm. Canadian Business Law Journal32: 384-439.
68.
Scheuerman WE ( 2004) Liberal Democracy and the Social Acceleration of Time . Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
69.
Schwab SJ and Thomas RS ( 1998) Realigning corporate governance: shareholder activism by labor unions. Michigan Law Review96: 1018-1094.
70.
Sims ACL and Public Works and Government Services Canada ( 1995) Seeking a Balance: Review of Part I of the Canada Labour Code. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada.
71.
Stone K van Wezel ( 1991) Employees as stakeholders under non-shareholder constituency statutes. Stetson Law Review21: 45-72.
72.
Supiot A. ( 2001) Beyond Employment: Changes in Work and the Future of Labour Law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73.
Teubner G. ( 2003/2004) Societal constitutionalism: alternatives to state-centred constitutional theory. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=876941 (accessed 22 April 2009).
74.
Tomlins C. ( 1985) The State and the Unions: Labor Relations, Law, and the Organized Labor Movement in America, 1880-1960. New York : Cambridge University Press.
75.
VanderVelde LS ( 1989) The labor vision of the thirteenth amendment. University of Pennsylvania Law Review138: 437-504.
76.
Vosko L., Zukewich N. and Cranford C. ( 2003) Precarious jobs: a new typology of employment. Perspectives on Labour and Income: The online edition. Available at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-001-x/01003/4096409-eng.html (accessed 18 May 2010).
77.
Waluchow WJ ( 2002) ‘Constitutionalism’. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/constitutionalism (accessed 14 September 2009).
78.
Wilkinson RG ( 2005) The Impact of Inequality: How to Make Sick Societies Healthier . New York: New Press . Distributed by W.W. Norton.
79.
Woods HD and Task Force onLabour Relations ( 1968) Canadian Industrial Relations: The Report of the Task Force on Labour Relations. Ottawa: Privy Council Office.
80.
Young M, Boyd S, Brodsky G and Day S (eds) (2007) Poverty: Rights, Social Citizenship, Legal Activism . Vancouver: UBC Press.
