The purpose of this article is four-fold. Firstly, it is meant to draw attention to Project Prevention, an American-based program funded largely by private donations used to offer people — mostly poor, racialized, drug-using women — up to $200 for limiting their reproductive abilities. Secondly, it highlights links between Project Prevention’s mandate and prevailing discriminatory scientific-medical, legal, political, and media discourses which serve to constitute certain ‘Truths’ about the dangers of prenatal drug-use and parenthood, particularly for women. Thirdly, Project Prevention is framed and theorized within its neo-liberal context in order to underscore the ways that contemporary (pregnant) bodies often become governed through social initiatives which implode state/non-state agencies, public/private distinctions. Finally, to ensure readers are not left with overly simplistic readings of the issues at hand, the article concludes by considering the potential role of counterclaims in terms of who does and does not get constructed as a ‘risky’ reproductive agent.
Andrews, Lori and M. Hibbert ( 2000) ‘Courts and Wrongful Birth: Can Disability Itself be Viewed as a Legal Wrong?’, pp. 318-300 in L. Francis and A. Silvers (eds) Americans with Disabilities: Exploring Implications of the Law for Individuals and Institutions. New York: Routledge .
3.
Baker, Phyliss and Amy Carson ( 1999) ‘"I TAKE CARE OF MY KIDS": Mothering Practices of Substance-Abusing Women’, Gender & Society13: 347-63.
4.
Banwell, Cathy and Gabriele Bammer ( 2006) ‘Maternal Habits: Narratives of Mothering, Social Position and Drug Use’, International Journal of Drug Policy17: 504-13.
5.
Bourdieu, Pierre ( 1987) ‘The Force of the Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field’, Hastings Law Journal38: 814-53.
6.
Boyd, Susan ( 1999) Mothering and Illicit Drugs: Transcending the Myths. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
7.
Boyd, Susan ( 2004) From Witches to Crack Moms: Women, Drug Law, and Policy. North CarolinaCarolina Academic Press.
8.
Boyd, Susan ( 2008) Hooked: Drug War Films in Britain, Canada, and the United States. New York: Routledge.
9.
Boyd, Susan and Karlene Faith ( 1999) ‘Women, Illegal Drugs and Prison: Views from Canada’ , International Journal of Drug Policy10: 195-207.
10.
Boyd, Susan and Lenora Marcellus (eds) (2007) With Child: Substance Use During Pregnancy, a Women-Centered Approach. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
11.
Brown, Emma ( 2006) ‘Good Mother, Bad Mother: Perception of Mothering by Rural African-American Women Who Use Cocaine’, Journal of Addiction Nursing17: 21-31.
12.
Campbell, Annily ( 1999) Childfree and Sterilized: Women’s Choices and Medical Responses. London: Cassell Publishing .
13.
Campbell, Nancy ( 2000) Using Women: Gender, Drug Policy, and Social Justice. New York: Routledge.
14.
Chasnoff, Ira, William Burns, Sidney Schnoll and Kayreen Burns ( 1985) ‘Cocaine Use in Pregnancy’, New England Journal of Medicine313: 666-9.
15.
Chasnoff, Ira and Dan Griffith ( 1989) ‘Cocaine: Clinical Studies of Pregnancy and the Newborn’, Prenatal Abuse of Licit and Illicit Drugs; Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences562: 260-6.
16.
Chasnoff, Ira, H.J. Landress and M.E. Barrett ( 1990) ‘The Prevalence of Illicit-Drug or Alcohol Use During Pregnancy and Discrepancies in Mandatory Reporting in Pinellas County, Florida’ , New England Journal of Medicine322: 1202-6.
17.
Dow-Edwards, Diana ( 1989) ‘Long-Term Neurochemical and Neurobehavioral Consequences of Cocaine Use during Pregnancy’, Prenatal Abuse of Licit and Illicit Drugs; Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences562: 280-9.
18.
Foucault, Michel ( 1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
19.
Frank, Deborah, Marilym Augustyn, Wanda Grant Knight, Tripler Pell and Barry Zuckerman ( 2001) ‘Growth, Development, and Behavior in Early Childhood Following Prenatal Cocaine Exposure: A Systematic Review’, Journal of the American Medical Association285: 1613-25.
20.
Gillespie, Rosemary ( 2000) ‘When No Means No: Disbelief, Disregard and Deviance as Discourses of Voluntary Childlessness’, Women’s Studies International Forum23: 223-34.
21.
Glenn, Jason ( 2006) ‘The Birth of the Crack Baby and the History that "Myths" Make’, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. Available at: http://www.utmb.edu/addiction/Birth%20of%20the%20Crack%20Baby.pdf (Retrieved 15 April 2007).
22.
Humphries, Drew ( 2000) ‘Crack Mothers at 6: Prime-Time News, Crack/Cocaine, and Women’, pp. 117-28 in Rosyln Muraskin (ed.) It’s a Crime: Women and Justice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
23.
Johnson, Jennifer Mott ( 2001) ‘Reproductive Ability for Sale, Do I Hear $200?: Private Cash-For-Contraception Agreements as an Alternative to Maternal Substance Abuse’, Arizona Law Review43: 205-44.
24.
Keren-Paz, Tsachi ( 2005) ‘On Mothers, Babies and Bathwater: Distributive Justice, Tort Law and Prenatal Duties’, Social & Legal Studies14: 179-96.
25.
Klee, Hilary, Marcia Jackson and Suzan Lewis (eds) ( 2002) Drug Misuse and Motherhood. London : Routledge.
26.
Larner, Wendy ( 2000) ‘Neo-Liberalism: Policy, Ideology, Governmentality’ , Studies in Political Economy63: 5-25. Available at: http://www.newcastle.edu.au/centre/curs/downloads/2003/spe%20_revised_.pdf
27.
Mackenzie, Robin ( 2008) ‘Feeling Good: The Ethopolitics of Pleasure; Psychoactive Substance Use and Public Health and Criminal Justice Governance: Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Drug Courts in the USA’, Social & Legal Studies17: 513-33.
28.
Mauldon, Jane Gilbert ( 2003) ‘Providing Subsidies and Incentives for Norplant, Sterilization and Other Contraception: Allowing Economic Theory to Inform Ethical Analysis’, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics31: 351-64.
29.
Maurer, Serena ( 2000) ‘Embodied Public Policies: The Sexual Stereotyping of Black Women in the Design and Implementation of U.S. Policies’, Journal of Public and International Affairs11: 36-51.
30.
Monroe, Jacquelyn and Rudolph Alexander, Jr. (2005) ‘C.R.A.C.K.: A Progeny of Eugenics and a Forlorn Representation for African Americans’, Journal of African American Studies9: 19-31.
31.
Moore, Sharon, Cynthia Moore, Octavia Madison-Colmore and Wanda Lott Collins ( 2005a) ‘Introduction to the Pros and Cons of C.R.A.C.K.: A Viable Solution to Parental Substance Abuse?’, Journal of African American Studies9: 3-5.
32.
Moore, Sharon, Cynthia Moore, Octavia Madison-Colmore and Wanda Lott Collins ( 2005b) ‘Reducing the Effects of Parental Substance Abuse on Children: A Spiritual Recommendation’, Journal of African American Studies9: 6-18.
33.
O’Malley, Pat ( 1996) ‘Risk and Responsibility’, pp. 189-207 in Andrew Barry, Thomas Osborne and Nikolas Rose (eds) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. London: University of Chicago Press.
34.
O’Malley, Pat and Mariana Valverde ( 2004) ‘Pleasure, Freedom and Drugs: The Uses of "Pleasure" in Liberal Governance of Drug and Alcohol Consumption’, Sociology38: 25-42.
35.
Paltrow, Lynn ( 2002) ‘The War on Drugs and the War on Abortion: Some Initial Thoughts on the Connections, Intersections and Effects’, Reproductive Health Matters10: 162-70.
36.
Project Prevention: Children in Need of a Caring Community ( 2007) ‘Statistics’. Available at: http://www.projectprevention.org
37.
Project Prevention: Children in Need of a Caring Community ( 2008a) ‘Frequently Asked Questions’. Available at: http://www.projectprevention.org/program/faqs.html
38.
Project Prevention: Children in Need of a Caring Community ( 2008b) ‘How We Help the Children’ 18 November. Available at: http://www.projectprevention.org/program/howwehelp.htm
39.
Project Prevention: Children in Need of a Caring Community ( 2008c) ‘Statistics’. Available at: http://www.projectprevention.org/reasons/statistics.html
40.
Project Prevention: Children in Need of a Caring Community ( 2008d) ‘Objectives’. Available at: http://www.projectprevention.org/cause/objectives.html
41.
Reinarman, Craig and Harry Levine (eds) (1997) Crack in America: Demon Drugs and Social Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.
42.
Rose, Nikolas ( 1996) ‘Governing "Advanced" Liberal Democracies’ , pp. 37-64 in Andrew Barry, Thomas Osborne and Nikolas Rose (eds) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. London: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Rose, Nikolas, Pat O’Malley and Mariana Valverde ( 2006) ‘Governmentality’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science2: 83-104.
44.
Ross, Loretta, Sarah Brownlee, Dázon Dixon Diallo, Luz Rodriguez and Latina Roundtable ( 2001) ‘The "SisterSong Collective": Women of Color, Reproductive Health and Human Rights’, American Journal of Health, Special Issue: The Health of Women of Color17: 79-88.
45.
Roth, Rachel ( 2000) Making Women Pay: The Hidden Costs of Fetal Rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
46.
Sagatun-Edwards, Inger ( 2000) ‘The Legal Response to Substance Abuse during Pregnancy’ , pp. 141-60 in Roslyn Muraskin (ed.) It’s a Crime: Women and Justice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
47.
Schoen, Johanna ( 2001) ‘Between Choice and Coercion: Women and the Politics of Sterilization in North Carolina, 1929-1975’, Journal of Women’s History13: 132-56.
48.
Shatila, Suzanne, Samuel MacMaster, Jenny Jones and Katherine Chaffin ( 2005) ‘C.R.A.C.K.: Unethical? What About Misogynist, Racist, and Classist?’, Journal of African American Studies9: 32-42.
49.
Sheldon, Sally ( 2006) ‘Reproductive Choice: Men’s Freedom and Women’s Responsibility?’, pp. 175-95 in J. R. Spencer and Antje du Bpose-Pedain (eds) Freedom and Responsibility in Reproductive Choice. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
50.
Smart, Carol ( 1989) Feminism and the Power of Law. London : Routledge.
51.
Smith, Andrea ( 2005) ‘Beyond Pro-Choice Versus Pro-Life: Women of Color and Reproductive Justice’, National Women’s Studies Association17: 119-40.
52.
Snider, Laureen ( 2004) ‘Resisting Neo-Liberalism: The Poisoned Water Disaster in Walkerton, Ontario’, Social & Legal Studies13: 265-89.
53.
Spear, Linda, Cheryl Kirstein and Nancy Frambes ( 1989) ‘Cocaine Effects on the Developing Nervous System: Behavioral, Psychopharmacological, and Neurochemical Studies’, Prenatal Abuse of Licit and Illicit Drugs; Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences562: 290-307.
54.
Sudbury, Julia (ed.) (2005) Global Lockdown: Race, Gender, and the Prison-Industrial Complex. New York: Routledge.
55.
Toscano, Vicki ( 2005) ‘Misguided Retribution: Criminalization of Pregnant Women Who Take Drugs’, Social & Legal Studies14: 359-86.
56.
Vanderveen, Ernestine ( 1989) ‘Public Health Policy: Maternal Substance Abuse and Child Health’, Prenatal Abuse of Licit and Illicit Drugs; Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences562: 255-9.
57.
Wilson, Philip ( 2002) ‘Harry Laughlin’s Eugenic Crusade to Control the "Socially Inadequate" in Progressive Era America’, Patterns of Prejudice36: 49-67.
58.
Woods, James, Mark Plessinger, Kimberly Scott and Richard Miller ( 1989) ‘Prenatal Cocaine Exposure to the Fetus: A Sheep Model for Cardiovascular Evaluation’, Prenatal Abuse of Licit and Illicit Drugs; Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences562: 267-79.
59.
Yancey, Gaynor ( 2005) ‘Recovery: An Alternative to Sterilization of Chemically Dependent Women’, Journal of African American Studies . 9: 43-56.
60.
Zerai, Assata and Rae Banks ( 2002) Dehumanizing Discourse, Anti-Drug Law, and Policy in America: A ‘Crack Mother’s’ Nightmare. Farnham : Ashgate.
61.
Zuckerman, Barry, Deborah Frank and Linda Mayes ( 2002) ‘Cocaine-Exposed Infants and Developmental Outcomes: "Crack Kids" Revisited’, Journal of the American Medical Association287: 1990-1.
