Adorno, T. W.
(1991) The Culture Industry.
London: Routledge
.
2.
Arrow, K. J.
(1985) Production and Capital.
Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press
.
3.
Bowman, W. S.
(1973) Patent and Antitrust Law.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press
.
4.
Campbell, D.
(1994)
‘Ayres Versus Coase: An Attempt to Recover the Issue of Equality
in Law and Economics’
, Journal of Law and Society21:
434-434
.
5.
Campbell, D.
(1996)
‘On What Is Valuable in Law and Economics’
, Otago Law Review8:
489-489
.
6.
Campbell, D.
and
S. Picciotto
(1998)
‘Exploring the Interaction Between Law and Economics: The Limits
of Formalism’
, Legal Studies18:
249-249
.
7.
Coase, R. H.
(1946)
‘The Marginal Cost Controversy’
, Economica13:
169-169
.
8.
Eisenberg, R. S.
(2001) ‘Bargaining over the Transfer of
Proprietary Research Tools: Is This Market Failing or
Emerging?’, in
R. C. Dreyfuss
,
D. L. Zimmerman
and
H. First
(eds) Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property: Innovation
Policy for the Information Society.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
9.
Gallini, N.
and
S. Scotchmer
(2002)
‘Intellectual Property: When Is It the Best Incentive System?’
, Innovation Policy and the Economy2:
51-51
.
10.
Hotelling, H.
(1938)
‘The General Welfare in Relation to Problems of Taxation and of
Railway and Utility Rates’
, Econometrica6:
242-242
.
11.
Hovenkamp, H.
,
M. D. Janis
and
M. A. Lemley
(2002) IP and Antitrust.
New York: Aspen
.
12.
Kaplow, L.
(1984)
‘The Patent-Antitrust Intersection: A Reappraisal’
, Harvard Law Review97:
1815-1815
.
13.
Kitch, E. W.
(2000)
‘Elementary and Persistent Errors in the Economic Analysis of
Intellectual Property’
, Vanderbilt Law Review53:
1727-1727
.
14.
Kollock, P.
(1999) ‘The Economics of Online Co-operation:
Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace’, in
M. A. Smith
and
P. Kollock
(eds) Communities in Cyberspace.
London: Routledge
.
15.
Lakatos, I.
(1978) The Methodology of Scientific Research
Programmes.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
16.
Landes, W. M.
and
R. A. Posner
(1987) The Economic Structure of Tort Law.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
17.
Merges, R. P.
(1994)
‘Of Property Rules, Coase, and Intellectual Property’
, Columbia Law Review94:
2655-2655
.
18.
OECD
(2004) OECD in Figures 2004. Available at: www.oecdbookshop.org
19.
Picciotto, S.
and
D. Campbell
(2003) ‘Whose Molecule Is It Anyway? Private and
Social Perspectives on Intellectual Property’, in
A. Hudson
(ed.) New Perspectives on Property Law: Obligations and
Restitution.
London: Cavendish
.
20.
Plant, A.
(1974) Selected Economic Essays and Addresses.
London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
.
21.
Posner, R. A.
(1969)
‘Natural Monopoly and Its Regulation’
, Stanford Law Review21:
518-518
.
22.
Posner, R. A.
(1976) Antitrust Law: An Economic Perspective.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
23.
Posner, R. A.
(1979)
‘The Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis’
, University of Pennsylvania Law Review127:
925-925
.
24.
Posner, R. A.
(1999) Natural Monopoly and Its Regulation: 30th Anniversary
Edition.
Washington, DC: Cato Institute
.
25.
Posner, R. A.
(2000)
‘Cost-benefit Analysis: Definition, Justification and Comment on
Conference Papers’
, Journal of Legal Studies29:
1153-1153
.
26.
Posner, R. A.
and
F. H. Easterbrook
(1981) Antitrust.
St. Paul, MN: West
.
27.
Reichman, J. H.
(2001) ‘Of Green Tulips and Legal Kudzu:
Repackaging Rights in Subpatentable Innovation’, in
R. C. Dreyfusset al.
(eds) Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property: Innovation
Policy for the Information Society.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
28.
Shavell, S.
and
T. van Ypersele
(2001)
‘Rewards versus Intellectual Property Rights’
, Journal of Law and Economics44:
525-525
.
29.
Stevenson, C. L.
(1938)
‘Persuasive Definitions’
, Mind47:
331-331
.
30.
Weber, S.
(2004) The Success of Open Source.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
