The European Commission’s White Paper on Governance in July 2001 focused attention, in a rather preliminary manner, on the role that ‘civil society’ could and should play in the process of further democratizing decision-making in the European Union. ‘Civil society’ has itself been trying to make this point for some years in the European context and now seems to have acquired some institutional allies in that regard. The European Economic and Social Committee has in particular been very focused and vocal in recent years, maintaining that the institutional ‘home’ for civil society should be within its putatively deliberative and inclusive structures. This rather corporatist view of fitting increasing civil society interest and activity into the existing interest representation model of the EU, which is shared by the Commission, risks ignoring the much more political role that certain strands of civil society are seeking: namely a space in which deliberation can publicly take place on values and policies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anheier, Helmut, Marlies Glasius and Mary Kaldor (2001) ‘Introducing Global Civil Society’, Yearbook of Global Civil Society1: 3-22.
2.
Bignami, Francesca E. (1999) ‘The Democratic Deficit in European Community Rulemaking: A Call for Notice and Comment in Comitology’, Harvard International Law Journal40: 451-515.
3.
Borzel, Tanja A. (1997) ‘What’s So Special About Policy Networks? - An Exploration of the Concept and its Usefulness in Studying European Governance’, European Integration Online Papers1: 16. 25 August 1997, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1997-016a.htm.
4.
Bovens, Mark (2002) ‘Information Rights. Citizenship in the Information Society’, Journal of Political Philosophy10: 317-341.
5.
Britz, Gabriela and Marlene Schmidt (2000) ‘The Institutionalized Participation of Management and Labour in the Legislative Activities of the European Community: A Challenge to the Principle of Democracy under Community Law’, European Law Journal6: 45-71.
6.
Castiglione, Dario (1998) ‘Civil Society’, in P. Newman (ed.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law. London: Palgrave.
7.
Caygill, Howard and Alan Scott (1995) ‘The Subject of the Constitution: The Debate in Germany, 1989 and After’, pp. 3-19 in R. Bellamy, V. Bufacchi and D. Castiglione (eds) Democracy and Constitutional Culture in the Union of Europe. London: Lothian Foundation Press.
8.
Cohen, Jean L. and Andrew Arato (1992) Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Commission of the European Communities (1993) Communication on ‘An Open and Structured Dialogue between the Commission and Special Interest Groups’, OJ C 63, 5 March.
10.
Commission of the European Communities (2000) ‘The Commission and NGO’s: Building a Stronger Partnership’, COM (2000) 11 final, OJ C 268, 19 September.
11.
Commission of the European Communities (2001a) ‘European Governance: A White Paper’, COM (2001) 428, final, 25 July.
12.
Commission of the European Communities (2001b) Report of Working Group ‘Consultation and Participation of Civil Society’ (Group 2a), Preparation for the White Paper on European Governance (2001) 1 June, http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/governance/white_paper/index_en.htm.
13.
Commission of the European Communities (2001c) ‘A New Framework for Cooperation on Activities Concerning the Information and Communications Policy of the European Union’, COM (2001) 354 final, 27 June.
14.
Craig, Paul (1997) ‘Democracy and Rulemaking within the EC: An Empirical and Normative Assessment’, European Law Journal3: 105-130.
15.
Curtin, Deirdre (1999) ‘Civil Society and the European Union: Opening Spaces for Deliberative Democracy?’, in Academy of European Law (eds) Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law vol. VII, book 1. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
16.
Curtin, Deirdre (2001) ‘The Commission as Sorcerer’s Apprentice: Reflections on EU Public Administration and the Role of Information Technology in Holding Bureaucracy Accountable’, in C. Joerges, Y. Meny, and J. H. H. Weiler (eds) Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission’s White Paper on Governance. Jean Monnet Working Paper No.6/01, http://www.iue.it/RSC/Governance.
17.
Curtin, Deirdre (2002) ‘Digital Government in the European Union anno 2001: Internal Security and Law Enforcement Trumps Democracy’, Non-Economic Concerns and National Economic Law. Vienna: (forthcoming).
18.
De Burca, Grainne and Jo Beatrix Aschenbrenner (2002, forthcoming) ‘European Constitutionalism and the Charter’, in S. Peers and A. Ward (eds) The European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights: Context and Possibilities. Oxford: Hart.
19.
Dehousse, Renaud (2001) ‘European Governance in Search of Legitimacy: The Need for a Process-Based Approach’, pp. 169-187 in O. De Schutter, N. Lebessis and J. Paterson (eds) Governance in the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
20.
De Schutter, Olivier (2001), ‘Europe in Search of its Civil Society’, in Erik Eriksen, John Fossum and Agustin Menendez (eds) The Chartering of Europe: The Charter of Fundamental Rights in Context (Arena Report No 8/2001). Oslo: Arena.
21.
Dutch Commission on Constitutional Rights in the Digital Era (2000) 24 May 2000, http://www.minbzk.nl/gdt/index2.htm.
22.
Dutch Council for Scientific Advice to the Government (1998) Staat zonder land. Een verkenning van bestuurlijke gevolgen van informatie en communicatietechnologie. The Hague: SDU.
23.
Diamond, Lawrence (1995) ‘Rethinking Civil Society: Toward Democratic Consolidation’, Journal of Democracy5: 3-17.
24.
Economic and Social Committee (1999) Opinion on ‘The role and contribution of civil society organizations in the building of Europe’, OJ C 329/30, 17 November.
25.
Economic and Social Committee (2001) Opinion on ‘Organized Civil Society and European Governance: The Committee’s Contribution to the Drafting of the White Paper’, 25 April.
26.
Eriksen, Erik O. and John E. Fossum (2000) Democracy in the European Union: Integration through Deliberation?London: Routledge.
27.
Ferguson, Adam (1995[1767]) An Essay on the History of Civil Society (ed. Fania Oz-Salzberger). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Greenwood, Justin (1997) Representing Interests in the European Union. London: Macmillan.
29.
Haas, Ernst (1958) The Uniting of Europe: Political, Economic and Social Forces, 1950-1957. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30.
Habermas, Jurgen (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (trans. W. Rehg). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
Habermas, Jurgen (2001) The Postnational Constellation. Political Essays (trans. M. Pensky). Cambridge: Polity Press.
32.
Hegel, Georg W. F. (1991[1820]) Elements of the Philosophy of Right (ed. Allen W. Wood, trans. H. B. Nisbet). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
ICT and Government Committee (2001) Citizen and Government in the Information Society: The Need for Institutional Innovation. The Hague: SDU. 6 September, http://www.minbzk.nl/international/documents/pub3092.htm.
34.
Joerges, Christian and Ellen Vos (eds) (1999) EU Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
Keane, John (2001) ‘Global Civil Society?’Yearbook of Global Civil Society, 1: 23-47.
36.
Keck, Margeret E. and Kathryn Sikkink (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
37.
Kohler-Koch, Beate (1997) ‘Organized Interests in the EC and the European Parliament’, 1 European Integration Online Papers 1: 9, 10 May, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1997-009a.htm.
38.
Mair, Peter (2000) ‘De toekomst-mogelijkheden van politieke partijen, links en de democratie’, Socialisme en Democratie12: 554.
39.
Majone, Giandomenico (2001) ‘International Regulatory Cooperation: A Neo-Institutionalist Approach’, pp. 119-145 in G. A. Bermann, M. Herdegen and P. L. Lindseth, Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation. Legal Problems and Political Prospects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
McLaughlin, John and Justin Greenwood (1995) ‘The Management of Interest Representation in the EU’, Journal of Common Market Studies33: 143-162.
41.
Middlemas, Keith (1995) Orchestrating Europe: The Informal Politics of the European Union 1973-1995. London: HarperCollins.
42.
Nentwich, Michael (1996) ‘Opportunity Structures for Citizens Participation: the Case of the European Union’, European Integration Online Papers0: 1, 5 November, http://eiop.ac.at/eiop/texte/1996-001.htm.
43.
Olsen, Jon Pierre (1991) ‘Political Science and Organization Theory: Parallel Agendas by Mutual Disregard’, p. 95 in R. Czada and A. Windhoff-Heretier (eds) Political Choice: Institutions, Rules and the Limits of Rationality. Frankfurt and Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
44.
Otto, Diane (1996) ‘Non-Governmental Organizations in the United Nations System: The Emerging Role of Civil Society’, Human Rights Quarterly18: 107-141.
45.
Pharr, Susan J. and Robert D. Putnam (2000) Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling theTrilateral Countries?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
Pianta, Mario (2001) ‘Parallel Summits of Global Civil Society’, Yearbook of Global Civil Society, 1: 169-193.
47.
Salamon, Lester M. and Helmut K. Anheier (1997) Defining the Non-Profit Sector. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
48.
Shapiro, Martin (1996) ‘Codification of Administrative Law: The US and the Union’, European Law Journal2: 26-47.
49.
Smismans, Stijn (1999) ‘An Economic and Social Committee for the Citizen, or a Citizen for the Economic and Social Committee?’, European Public Law5: 557-582.
50.
Smismans, Stijn (2000) ‘The European Economic and Social Committee: Towards Deliberative Democracy via a Functional Assembly’, European Integration Online Papers4: 12, 19 September, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-012a.htm.
51.
Social and Cultural Planning Board (2000) The Netherlands in Europe. The Hague: SDU.
52.
Statewatch (2002) http://www.statewatch.org.
53.
Steinberg, Philipp (2001) ‘Agencies, Co-Regulation and Comitology - and what about politics? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission’s White Paper on Governance’, in C. Joerges, Y. Meny and J. H. H. Weiler (eds) Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission’s White Paper on Governance, Jean Monnet Working Paper No.6/01, http://www.iue.it/RSC/Governance.
54.
Strauss, Peter (2001) ‘The Challenges of Globally Accessible Process’, pp. 547-567 in G. A. Bermann, M. Herdegen and P. L. Lindseth, Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation: Legal Problems and Political Prospects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
Van de Voort, Willem J. (1997) ‘In Search of a Role. The Economic and Social Committee in European Decision-Making’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Utrecht.
56.
Wallace, Helen (2002) ‘The Council: An Institutional Chameleon?’, Governance15: 325-344.
57.
Wallace, Helen and Andrew Young (1997) Participation and Policy-Making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58.
Weiler, Joseph (1997) ‘The European Union Belongs to its Citizens: Three Immodest Proposals’, European Law Review22: 150-156.
59.
Wolf, Franz-Otto (2001) ‘Zivilgesellschaftliche Netzwerke, Globalisierung, Europäisierung und Demokratisierungschancen. Erwartungen aktiver Trägerinnen und staatliche Handlungsoptionen’, unpublished manuscript.
