The mass media are becoming increasingly interested in legal trials. This has led to concerns that legal rationality could be threatened by an emotionally driven media spectacle. The dichotomy between emotions and law has recently come to the fore in the enforced caesarean case of St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust v S[1998]. Studying the press reports on this case, my argument is that maintaining this dichotomy can produce the undesirable effect of justifying coercive medical treatment of pregnant women as an authentic, natural and spontaneous response. Emotions in this respect have to be denaturalized. Coercive surgery for pregnant women is neither a universal nor a necessary response, but one that has to be situated in its appropriate ideological, cultural and philosophical context. This requires attention to be focused on the fluidity and possible interconnections of law and emotions, and not so much on their polarity and mutual exclusion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales (1994) ‘L’Emprise du Journalisme’ 101-2.
2.
Bourdieu, P. (1987) ‘The Force of Law: Towards a Sociology of the Juridical Field’, Hastings Law Journal38(5): 814-853.
3.
Bourdieu, P. (1994) ‘L’Emprise du Journalisme’, Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 101-2: 3-9.
4.
Bourdieu, P. (1998) On Television and Journalism. London: Pluto.
5.
Bourdieu, P. and L. Wacquant (1996) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Polity.
6.
Bridgeman, J. and S. Millns (1998) Feminist Perspectives on Law: Law’s Engagement with the Female Body. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
7.
Chibnall, S. (1977) Law-and-Order News: An Analysis of Crime Reporting in the British Press. London: Tavistock.
8.
Cowan, D. and S. Kitzinger (1997) ‘Are Too Many Made to Give Birth this Way?’, The Express 19 February.
9.
Davies, P. W. (1997) ‘Ms S, Forcibly Cut Open to Deliver her Baby: The Doctor’s Dilemma’, The Independent 19 February.
10.
Denvir, J. (1996) ‘Introduction’, pp. xi-xviii in J. Denvir (ed.) Legal Reelism: Movies as Legal Texts. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
11.
Diduck, A. (1993) ‘Legislating Ideologies of Motherhood’, Social & Legal Studies2: 461-485.
12.
Duce, R. (1998) ‘ “Bizarre Conduct” Not Good Reason for Caesarean’, The Times 8 May.
13.
Dutter, B. (1998) ‘Caeserean Forced on Mother was Unlawful’, The Daily Telegraph 8 May.
14.
Dyer, C. (1997) ‘Forced Caesarean Woman Ready to Accept Death’, The Guardian 19 February.
15.
Ehrenreich, B. and D. English (1979) For Her Own Good: 150 Years of Experts’ Advice to Women. London: Pluto.
16.
Frost, B. (1997) ‘Woman Claims Caesarean was Unlawful. Social Worker Acted After Patient Said she Did Not Care if Baby Died, court told’, The Times 19 February.
17.
Garapon, A. (1996) ‘Justice out of Court: The Dangers of Trial by Media’, pp. 231-245 in D. Nelken (ed.) Law as Communication. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
18.
Garapon, A. (1997) ‘Justice et Médias: une Alchimie Douteuse’, MédiasPouvoirs 1(4): 61-8.
19.
Glasgow University Media Group (1976) Bad News. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
20.
Glasgow University Media Group (1980) More Bad News. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
21.
Golding, P. and S. Middleton (1982) Images of Welfare: Press and Public Attitudes to Poverty. Oxford: Blackwell and Martin Robertson.
22.
Griffiths, J. (1986) ‘What is Legal Pluralism?’, Journal of Legal Pluralism24: 1-55.
23.
Grubb, A. (1995) ‘Commentary on Attorney-General’s Reference (No. 3 of 1994)’, Medical Law Review3: 302-310.
24.
Hall, S. (1982) ‘The Rediscovery of “Ideology”: Return of the Repressed in Media Studies’, pp. 56-90 in M. Gurevitch, T. Bennett, Y. Curran and J. Woollacott (eds) Culture, Society and the Media. London: Methuen.
25.
Hall, S., C. Critcher, T. Jefferson, J. Clarke and B. Roberts (1978) Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order. London: Macmillan.
26.
Harper, R. S. (1999) Medical Treatment and the Law: The Protection of Adults and Minors in the Family Division. Bristol: Jordan.
27.
Hinsliff, G. (1997) ‘A Mother’s “Solution” Woman in Caesarean Case “Spoke of Having Dead Baby” ’, The Daily Mail 19 February.
28.
Karpin, I. (1992) ‘Legislating the Female Body: Reproductive Technology and the Reconstructed Woman’, Columbia Journal of Gender and Law3: 325-349.
29.
Lacey, N. (1998) Unspeakable Subjects: Feminist Essays in Legal and Social Theory. Oxford: Hart.
30.
Luhmann, N. (1985) A Sociological Theory of Law. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
31.
McQuail, D. and S. Windahl (1993) Communication Models for the Study of Mass Communications, 2nd edn.London: Longman.
32.
MédiasPouvoirs (1997) ‘Dossier: Justice et Médias’ 1(4).
33.
Merry, S. E. (1988) ‘Legal Pluralism’, Law and Society Review22(5): 869-896.
34.
Norrie, A. (1993) ‘Closure and Critique: Antinomy in Modern Legal Theory’, pp. 1-21 in A. Norrie (ed.) Closure or Critique. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
35.
Norrie, A. (1996) ‘From Law to Popular Justice: Beyond Antinomialism’, Social & Legal Studies5(3): 383-404.
36.
O’Crady, S. (1997) ‘Agony of the Mother Forced to have a Caesarean. Social Workers in the Dock over Woman they Branded a Mental Case for Refusing Op’, The Express 19 February.
37.
Petchesky, R. P. (1987) ‘Foetal Images: the Power of Visual Culture in the Politics of Reproduction’, pp. 57-80 in M. Stanworth (ed.) Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. Cambridge: Polity Press in association with Blackwell.
38.
Raymond, C. (1997) ‘Caesarean Mum’s Bid to Sue Docs’, The Mirror 19 February.
39.
Sarat, A. and T. R. Kearns (1993) ‘Beyond the Great Divide: Forms of Legal Scholarship and Everyday Life’, pp. 21-61 in A. Sarat and T. Kearns (eds) Law in Everyday Life. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
40.
Savage, W. (1986) A Savage Enquiry: Who Controls Childbirth?London: Virago.
41.
Savage, W. (1997) ‘A Woman’s Right to Refuse’, The Guardian 27 March.
42.
Schlesinger, P. and H. Tumber (1994) Reporting Crime: The Media Politics of Criminal Justice. Oxford: Clarendon.
43.
Sheldon, S. (1998) ‘ “A Responsible Body of Medical Men Skilled in that Particular Art...”: Rethinking the BolamTest’, pp. 15-32 in S. Sheldon and M. Thomson (eds) Feminist Perspectives on Health Care Law. London: Cavendish.
44.
Showalter, E. (1987) The Female Malady: Women, Madness, and English Culture, 1830-1980. London: Virago.
45.
Smart, C. (1992) ‘The Woman of Legal Discourse’, Social & Legal Studies1: 29-44.
46.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (1993) ‘The Folly of the “Social Scientific” Concept of Legal Pluralism’, Journal of Law and Society20(2): 192-217.
47.
Terdiman, R. (1987) ‘The Force of Law: Towards a Sociology of the Juridical Field by Pierre Bourdieu, Translator’s Introduction’, Hastings Law Journal38(5): 805-813.
48.
Tester, K. (1994) Media, Culture, and Morality. London: Routledge.
49.
Thaler, P. (1997) ‘The Case of O. J. Simpson (1995) “No closer to Greek tragedy than Oedipus Hertz” ’, pp. 189-201 in L. Chiasson Jr. (ed.) The Press on Trial: Crimes and Trials as Media Events. Westport: Greenwood.
50.
The Independent (1997) ‘Pregnant Woman and the Need to be Patient’, 19 February.
51.
Thomson, M. (1994) ‘After Re S’, Medical Law Review2: 127-148.
52.
Thomson, M. (1998) Reproducing Narrative: Gender, Reproduction and Law. Aldershot: Ashgate.
53.
Weber, M. (1954) Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society (edited by M. Rheinstein). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
54.
Wells, C. (1998) ‘On the Outside Looking In: Perspectives on Enforced Caesareans’, pp. 237-257 in S. Sheldon and M. Thomson (eds) Feminist Perspectives on Health Care Law. London: Cavendish.
55.
Widdett, C. and M. Thomson (1997) ‘Justifying Treatment and Other Stories: Tame-side and Glossop Acute Services NHS Trust v CH (A Patient)’, Feminist Legal Studies5(1): 77-89.
