The aim of this article is to argue in favour of queer theory’s potential for non-essentialist politics and legal strategies within the European context. The issues raised focus on the connection between gay/lesbian and transgender rights politics, and on the queer potential of sexual discrimination litigation. Taking as my example two recent court cases of the European Court of Justice (P v S and Cornwall County Council; Lisa Grant v South West Trains Ltd), I attempt to establish links between the apparently contradictory ‘academic queer critiques’ and ‘practical politics’ (of litigation) through a queer reading of those cases. Two parallel lines of thought are developed: first, those cases bring the intrinsic connection of gay/lesbian and transgender politics into sight through their combination of sex discrimination and sexual orientation discrimination; secondly, the analysis of the two cases shall illustrate the simultaneous procedures involved in all staging of politics: both cases re-inscribe and disrupt the deviance of homosexuality and transgender at the same time. I contend that the apparent gap between ‘practical (legal) politics’ and ‘queer academic thought’ need not be as fundamental as many make it out to be and that in the European context a queer legal critique is both necessary and fruitful in that it highlights the ‘dilemma of rights politics’.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beger, Nicole J. (1997) Present Theories, Past Realities. Feminist Historiography meets ‘Poststructuralisms’. Frankfurt/Oder: Viademica.
2.
Bell, Mark (1998a) ‘Article 13: A Sound Base for EU Anti-discrimination Law?’ Unpublished paper provided by the author.
3.
Bell, Mark (1998b) ‘Shifting Conceptions of Sexual Discrimination at the Court of Justice: from P v S to Grant v SWT’. Unpublished paper provided by the author.
4.
Berlant, Lauren and Elizabeth Freeman (1992) ‘Queer Nationality’, Boundary2: 150-180.
5.
Berlant, Lauren and Michael Warner (1995) ‘What does Queer Theory Teach us About X?’PMLA: Publications of the Modern Languages Association of America110(3): 343-349.
6.
Berube, Allan and Jeffrey Escoffier (1991) ‘Queer/Nation’, Out/Look 11 winter 1991.
7.
Blasius, Mark (1998) ‘Contemporary Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer Theories, and their Politics’, Journal of the History of Sexuality8(4): 642-674.
8.
Bower, Lisa (1997) ‘Queer Problems/Straight Solutions: The Limits of a Politics of Official Recognition’, in Shane Phelan (ed.) Playing with Fire: Queer Politics, Queer Theories. London: Routledge.
9.
Brown, Wendy (1995) States of Injury. Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton: Princeton Paperbacks.
10.
Butler, Judith (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
11.
Butler, Judith (1992) ‘Contingent Foundation: Feminism and the Question of “Postmodernism” ’, in Judith Butler and Joan Scott. (eds) Feminists Theorize the Political. New York: Routledge.
12.
Butler, Judith (1993) Bodies that Matter. New York: Routledge.
13.
Case, Mary Ann C. (1995) ‘Disaggregating Gender from Sex and Sexual Orientation: The Effeminate Man in the Law and Feminist Jurisprudence’, The Yale Law Journal105(1): 1-100.
14.
Cohen, Cathy J. (1997) ‘Punks, Bulldagger, and Welfare Queens: The Radical Potential of Queer Politics?’A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies3(4): 437-466.
15.
Currah, Paisley (1997) ‘Defending Genders: Sex and Gender Non-Conformity in the Civil Rights Strategies of Sexual Minorities’, Hastings Law Journal48(6): 1363-1385.
16.
Duggan, Lisa and Nan D. Hunter (1995) Sex Wars. Sexual Dissent and Political Culture. London, New York: Routledge.
17.
Duggan, Lisa (1998) ‘The Incredible Shrinking Public: Sexual Politics and the Decline of Democracy’. Keynote lecture held at the conference ‘Queering Democracy: Gender, Sexuality, and Citizenship’,Berlin9-11 October 1998, paper provided by the author.
18.
Evans, David T. (1993) Sexual Citizenship. The Material Construction of Sexualities. London, New York: Routledge.
19.
Evans, David T. (1998) ‘Between “Moral” State and Amoral Market: The Material Dimensions and Political Dilemmas of Sexual Citizenship in Late Modernity’. Keynote lecture held at the conference ‘Queering Democracy: Gender, Sexuality, and Citizenship’, Berlin9-11 October 1998, paper provided by the author.
20.
Franke, Katherine (1995) ‘The Central Mistake of Sex Discrimination Law: The Disaggregation of Sex From Gender’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review144(1): 1-99.
21.
Goldman, Ruth (1996) ‘Who is that Queer Queer? Exploring Norms around Sexuality, Race, and Class in Queer theory’, in Brett Beemyn and Mickey Eliason (eds) Queer Studies: A Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Anthology. New York, London: New York University Press.
22.
Halley, Janet E. (1993) ‘The Construction of Heterosexuality’, in Michael Warner (ed.) Fear of a Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23.
Hark, Sabine (1998) ‘Acting without a Hand Rail - Paradoxes of Civil Rights Policies’. Keynote lecture held at the conference ‘Queering Democracy: Gender, Sexuality, and Citizenship’, Berlin9-11 October 1998, paper provided by the author.
24.
ILGA-Europe (1998) Equality for Lesbians and Gay Men. A Relevant Issue in the Civil and Social Dialogue. Vienna: ILGA.
25.
Jagose, Annamarie (1996) Queer Theory: An Introduction. New York, London: Routledge.
26.
Kaplan, Morris (1997) Sexual Justice: Democratic Citizenship and the Politics of Desire. London: Routledge.
27.
Martin, Biddy (1994) ‘Sexualities without Genders and Other Queer Utopias’, Diacritics24(2-3): 104-121.
28.
Morgan, Wayne (1995) ‘Queer Law: Identity, Culture, Diversity, Law’, Australian Gay and Lesbian Law Journal5: 1-41.
29.
Morgan, Wayne (1996) ‘Still in the Closet: the Heterosexism of Equal Opportunity Law’, Critical InQueeries1(2): 119-146.
30.
Namaste, Ki (1996a) ‘The Politics of Inside/out: Queer theory, Poststructuralism, and a Sociological Approach to Sexuality’, in Steven Seidman (ed.) Queer theory/Sociology. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
31.
Namaste, Ki (1996b) ‘Tragic Misreadings: Queer Theory’s Erasure of Transgender Subjectivity’, in Brett Beemyn and Mickey Eliason (eds) Queer Studies: A Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Anthology. New York, London: New York University Press.
Poovey, Mary (1988) ‘Feminism and Deconstruction’, Feminist Studies14(1): 51-65.
34.
Rahman, Momin and Stevi Jackson (1997) ‘Liberty, Equality and Sexuality: Essentialism and the Discourse of Rights’, Journal of Gender Studies6(2): 117-129.
35.
Savoy, Eric (1994) ‘You Can’t Go Homo Again: Queer theory and the Foreclosing of Gay Studies’, English Studies in Canada20(2): 129-144.
36.
Seidman, Steven (1995) ‘Deconstructing queer theory or the under-theorization of the social and the ethical’, in Linda Nicholson and Steven Seidman (eds) Social Postmodernism: Beyond Identity Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Skidmore, Paul (1997a) ‘Commentary: Sex, Gender and Comparators in Employment Discriminaiton’, Industrial Law Journal26(1): 51-61.
38.
Skidmore, Paul (1997b) ‘Can Transsexuals suffer sex discrimination?’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law19(1): 105-114.
39.
Smith, Anna-Marie (1998) ‘Gay Rights = Gay Marriage? - Gay Politics and the Post-Welfare State’. Keynote lecture held at the conference ‘Queering Democracy: Gender, Sexuality, and Citizenship’, Berlin, 9-11 October 1998, paper provided by the author.
40.
Stychin, Carl (1995) Law’s Desire: Sexuality and the Limits of Justice. New York, London: Routledge.
41.
Warner, Michael (1992) ‘From Queer to Eternity: An Army of Theorists cannot fail’, The Village Voice Literary Supplement 106 June 1992: 18-19.
42.
Warner, Michael (1993) ‘Introduction’, in M. Warner (ed.) Fear of a Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
43.
Wintemute, Robert (1997) ‘Recognising New Kinds of Direct Sex Discrimination: Transsexualism, Sexual Orientation and Dress Codes’, The Modern Law Review60(3): 334-359.
