The Indian Child Welfare Act gives the tribes the power to determine the placement of Indian children. American Indian tribes are semi-sovereign entities which retain the power to control their internal affairs and are not constrained by the Constitution. In making child welfare determinations tribes engage in practices which in other cases would be unconstitutional: they apply group rights to trump parental interests and they determine tribal membership on the basis of criteria which are arguably racial. The Act reveals the irresolvable conflict between tribal norms and concepts of identity and those found in American liberalism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atwood, Barbara (1989) ‘Fighting Over Indian Children: The Uses and Abuses of Jurisdictional Ambiguity’, UCLA Law Review36: 1051-1108.
2.
Bakeis, Christine (1996) ‘The Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978: Violating Personal Rights for the Sake of the Tribe’, Notre Dame Journal of Legal Ethics and Public Policy10: 543-586.
3.
Banks, R. Richard (1998) ‘The Color of Desire: Fulfilling Adoptive Parents’ Racial Preferences through Discriminatory State Action’, Yale Law Journal107: 875-964.
4.
Barsh, Russel and James Henderson (1980) The Road: Indian Tribes and Political Identity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
5.
Bartholet, Elizabeth (1993) Family Bonds. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
6.
Canby, William Jr. (1988) American Indian Law. Minneapolis, MN: West Publishing Company.
7.
Carriere, Jeanne Louise (1994) ‘Representing the Native American’, Iowa Law Review79: 585-652.
8.
Cohen, Felix S. (photo reprint of 1st edn.1942) Handbook of Federal Indian Law. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico.
9.
Cornell, Stephen (1988) ‘The Transformations of Tribe: Organization and Self-concept in Native American Ethnicities,’Ethnic and Racial Studies11: 27-43.
10.
Coyle, Marcia (1991) ‘After the Gavel Comes Down: It’s Never Over When It’s Over, Parties Before the Supreme Court Find Out’, National Law Journal 25 February.
11.
Davis, Toni Hahn (1993) ‘The Indian Family Exception to the Indian Child Welfare Act’, North Dakota Law Review69: 465-495.
12.
Franklin, Benjamin (1784/1794) Two Tracts. London.
13.
Goldberg-Ambrose, Carole (1991) ‘Not “Strictly” Racial: A Response to “Indians as Peoples” ’, UCLA Law Review39: 169-190.
14.
Goldberg-Ambrose, Carole (1994) ‘Of Native Americans and Tribal Members: The Impact of Law on Indian Group Life’, Law and Society Review28: 1123-1146.
15.
Goldsmith, Donna (1990) ‘Individual vs. Collective Rights’, Harvard Women’s Law Journal13: 1.
16.
Hillerman, Tony (1989) A Thief of Time. London: Sphere Books.
17.
Howard, Margaret (1984) ‘Transracial Adoption: Analysis of the Best Interest Standard’, Notre Dame Law Review59: 503-555.
18.
Jaimes, M. Annette (1992) ‘Federal Indian Identification Policy’, pp. 123-138 in M. A. Jaimes (ed.) The State of Native America: Genocide, Colonization and Resistance. Boston: South End Press.
19.
Kukathas, Chandran (1995) ‘Are There Any Cultural Rights?’, pp. 228-256 in W. Kymlicka (ed.), The Rights of Minority Cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
Kymlicka, Will (1989) Liberalism, Community and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Kymlicka, Will (ed.) (1995) The Rights of Minority Cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Kymlicka, Will (1996) ‘The Good, the Bad, and the Intolerable: Minority Group Rights’, Dissentsummer: 22-30.
23.
Lacey, Linda (1986) ‘The White Man’s Law and the American Indian Family in the Assimilation Era’, Arkansas Law Review40: 327-379.
24.
Margalit, Avishai and Moshe Halbertal (1994) ‘Liberalism and the Right to Culture’, Social Research61: 491-510.
25.
Margalit, Avishai and Joseph Raz (1990) ‘National Self-Determination’, Journal of Philosophy87: 439-461.
26.
Metteer, Christine (1997) ‘The Existing Indian Family Exception’, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review30: 646-691.
27.
Metteer, Christine (1998) ‘Hard Cases Make Bad Law: The Need for Revision of the Indian Child Welfare Act’, Santa Clara Law Review38: 419-472.
28.
Nagel, Joane (1996) The American Indian Ethnic Revival. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Newton, Nell Jessup (1984) ‘Federal Power Over Indians’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review132: 195-287.
30.
NICWA (National Indian Child Welfare Organization) (1997) ‘ICWA Update’, http://www.itcn.org./icwa.
31.
O’Brien, Sharon (1991) ‘Tribes and Indians: With Whom Does the United States Maintain a Relationship?’, Notre Dame Law Review66: 1461-1494.
32.
Rawls, John (1993a) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
33.
Rawls, John (1993b) ‘The Law of Peoples’, pp. 41-82 in Stephen Shute and Susan Hurley (eds) On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures - 1993. New York: Basic Books.
34.
Reid, T. R. (1987) ‘Mormon-Navajo Adoption Fight Settled: White Couple Keeps Indian Child; Biological Mother Retains Rights’, Washington Post, 30 October, A3.
35.
Stiffarm, Lenore and Phil Lane Jr. (1992) ‘The Demography of Native North America: A Question of American Indian Survival’, pp. 23-54 in M. A. Jaimes (ed.) The State of Native America: Genocide, Colonization and Resistance. Boston: South End Press.
36.
Williams, David (1991a) ‘The Borders of the Equal Protection Clause: Indians as Peoples’, UCLA Law Review38: 759-870.
37.
Williams, David (1991b) ‘Sometimes Suspect: A Response to Professor Goldberg-Ambrose’, UCLA Law Review39: 191-211.
38.
Williams, Robert Jr. (1990) The American Indian in Western Legal Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
