Comparison of dry needling and ischaemic compression techniques on pain and function in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomised clinical trial
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2020
Comparison of dry needling and ischaemic compression techniques on pain and function in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomised clinical trial
To compare the effectiveness of ischaemic compression (IC) applied directly to the knee versus dry needling (DN) with respect to pain, functional status and sensitivity to mechanical stimulation of vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS).
Methods:
A total of 54 patients with unilateral PFPS aged 20–30 years were selected randomly from patients referred to physical therapy clinics of Babol University of Medical Sciences in Iran. Twenty-seven patients were allocated to either IC or DN groups. Three sessions of treatment were applied over 1 week with follow-up at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. Primary outcome measures comprised the Kujala questionnaire score for functional status, numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) for pain intensity and pressure pain threshold (PPT) for sensitivity to mechanical stimulation; these were measured and recorded before treatment and 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after the last treatment session.
Results:
There were no statistically significant differences in the between-group comparisons of any variables at the various follow-up points. Both groups (n = 27 participants each) had significant improvements (p < 0.05) in pain, functional status and PPT values at follow-up.
Conclusions:
There were no differences in markers of pain, function or pressure sensitivity over a 3-month follow-up period between patients with PFPS treated with DN and IC. Temporal improvements in both groups suggested that the two techniques may be similarly effective for the treatment of PFPS.
RothermichMAGlavianoNRLiJ, et al. Patellofemoral pain: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment options. Clin Sports Med2015; 34(2): 313–327.
2.
WitvrouwELysensRBellemansJ, et al. Open versus closed kinetic chain exercises for patellofemoral pain. A prospective, randomized study. Am J Sports Med2000; 28: 687–694.
3.
ChaitowLDJ. Clinical application of neuromuscular techniques: the lower body, vol. 2. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingston, 2002, p. 610.
4.
PowersCMLandelRPerryJ.Timing and intensity of vastus muscle activity during functional activities in subjects with and without patellofemoral pain. Phys Ther1996; 76(9): 946–955; discussion 956–967.
5.
CrossleyKBennellKGreenS, et al. Physical therapy for patellofemoral pain: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Sports Med2002; 30(6): 857–865.
6.
CrossleyKMBennellKLCowanSM, et al. Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2004; 85(5): 815–822.
7.
MiaoPXuYPanC, et al. Vastus medialis oblique and vastus lateralis activity during a double-leg semisquat with or without hip adduction in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2015; 16: 289.
8.
BehrangradSKamaliF.Comparison of ischemic compression and lumbopelvic manipulation as trigger point therapy for patellofemoral pain syndrome in young adults: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther2017; 21(3): 554–564.
9.
PattynEVerdonkPSteyaertA, et al. Vastus medialis obliquus atrophy: does it exist in patellofemoral pain syndrome?Am J Sports Med2011; 39(7): 1450–1455.
10.
CowanSMBennellKLHodgesPW, et al. Delayed onset of electromyographic activity of vastus medialis obliquus relative to vastus lateralis in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82: 183–189.
11.
NguyenBM.Myofascial trigger point, falls in the elderly, idiopathic knee pain and osteoarthritis: an alternative concept. Med Hypotheses2013; 80(6): 806–809.
12.
KalichmanLVulfsonsS.Dry needling in the management of musculoskeletal pain. J Am Board Fam Med2010; 23: 640–646.
13.
KietrysDMPalombaroKMAzzarettoE, et al. Effectiveness of dry needling for upper-quarter myofascial pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2013; 43(9): 620–634.
14.
Llamas-RamosRPecos-MartinDGallego-IzquierdoT, et al. Comparison of the short-term outcomes between trigger point dry needling and trigger point manual therapy for the management of chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2014; 44(11): 852–861.
15.
Zuil-EscobarJCMartínez-CepaCBMartín-UrrialdeJA, et al. The prevalence of latent myofascial trigger points in lower limb muscles in asymptomatic subjects. PMRJ2016; 8: 1055–1064.
16.
HoyleJAMarrasWSSheedyJE, et al. Effects of postural and visual stressors on myofascial trigger point development and motor unit rotation during computer work. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2011; 21(1): 41–48.
17.
DommerholtJ.Dry needling – peripheral and central considerations. J Man Manip Ther2011; 19(4): 223–227.
18.
DippenaarDL. The association between myofascial trigger points of the quadriceps femoris muscle and the clinical presentation of patellofemoral pain syndrome using a piloted patellofemoral pain severity scale. Master’s Degree in Technology dissertation, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2003.
19.
LucasKR.The impact of latent trigger points on regional muscle function. Curr Pain Headache Rep2008; 12(5): 344–349.
20.
SmithKLF. The role of and relationship between hamstring and quadriceps muscle myofascial trigger points in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Master’s Degree in Technology dissertation, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2012.
PetersJSTysonNL.Proximal exercises are effective in treating patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther2013; 8(5): 689–700.
23.
EarlJEHochAZ.A proximal strengthening program improves pain, function, and biomechanics in women with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Am J Sports Med2011; 39(1): 154–163.
24.
GarciaFRAzevedoFMAlvesN, et al. Effects of electrical stimulation of vastus medialis obliquus muscle in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: an electromyographic analysis. Rev Bras Fisioter2010; 14(6): 477–482.
25.
HillermannBGomesANKorporaalC, et al. A pilot study comparing the effects of spinal manipulative therapy with those of extra-spinal manipulative therapy on quadriceps muscle strength. J Manipulative Physiol Ther2006; 29(2): 145–149.
26.
De MeulemeesterKECasteleinBCoppietersI, et al. Comparing trigger point dry needling and manual pressure technique for the management of myofascial neck/shoulder pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther2017; 40(1): 11–20.
27.
De-la-Llave-RinconAILoa-BarberoBPalacios-CenaM, et al. Manual therapy combined with dry needling for the management of patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Man Ther2016; 25: 157–169.
28.
RicardsLD.The effectiveness of non-invasive treatments for active myofascial trigger point pain: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Osteopath Med2006; 9: 120–136.
Espi-LopezGVSerra-AnoPVicent-FerrandoJ, et al. Effectiveness of inclusion of dry needling in a multimodal therapy program for patellofemoral pain: a randomized parallel-group trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2017; 47(6): 392–401.
31.
Velazquez-SaornilJRuiz-RuizBRodriguez-SanzD, et al. Efficacy of quadriceps vastus medialis dry needling in a rehabilitation protocol after surgical reconstruction of complete anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Medicine2017; 96(17): e6726.
32.
CagnieBCasteleinBPollieF, et al. Evidence for the use of ischemic compression and dry needling in the management of trigger points of the upper trapezius in patients with neck pain: a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2015; 94(7): 573–583.
33.
NegahbanHPouretezadMYazdiMJ, et al. Persian translation and validation of the Kujala patellofemoral scale in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Disabil Rehabil2012; 34(26): 2259–2263.
34.
LeeJJLeeMKKimJE, et al. Pain relief scale is more highly correlated with numerical rating scale than with visual analogue scale in chronic pain patients. Pain Physician2015; 18(2): E195–E200.
35.
PelfortXTorres-ClaramuntRSanchez-SolerJF, et al. Pressure algometry is a useful tool to quantify pain in the medial part of the knee: an intra- and inter-reliability study in healthy subjects. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2015; 101(5): 559–563.
36.
GerwinRDShannonSHongCZ, et al. Interrater reliability in myofascial trigger point examination. Pain1997; 69(1–2): 65–73.
37.
MyburghCLauridsenHHLarsenAH, et al. Standardized manual palpation of myofascial trigger points in relation to neck/shoulder pain; the influence of clinical experience on inter-examiner reproducibility. Man Ther2011; 16(2): 136–140.
38.
SanzDRLoboCCLopezDL, et al. Interrater reliability in the clinical evaluation of myofascial trigger points in three ankle muscles. J Manipulative Physiol Ther2016; 39(9): 623–634.
39.
HainsGHainsF.Patellofemoral pain syndrome managed by ischemic compression to the trigger points located in the peri-patellar and retro-patellar areas: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Chiropr2010; 13: 201–209.
40.
Weyer-HendersonD.An investigation into the effectiveness of dry needling of myofascial trigger points on total work and other recorded measurements of the vastus lateralis and vastus medialis muscles in patellofemoral pain syndrome in long distance runners. Master’s Degree in Technology dissertation, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2005.
