Carston, R. (1994) Metalinguistic negation and echoic use, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics6321-39
2.
Clark, H. (1995) Arenas of Lauguage Use, The University of Chicago Press and Center for the Study of Language and Information. Chicago
3.
Corbett, E. (1971) Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student, Oxford University Press, Oxford
4.
Cruse, D. (1986) Lexical Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5.
Cruse, D. (1992) Monosemy vs. polysemy, review of C. Ruhl ( 1989) below, Linguistics30, 577-99
6.
Emanatian, M. (1991) Grammatical Polysemy: The Systematicity of Multiple Meanings in Grammar, Ph.D. thesis, University of Califomia , Berkeley
7.
Fauconnier, G. (1985) Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., London
8.
Geeraerts, D. (1990) The lexicographical treatment of prototypical polysemy , in S. Tsohatzidis (ed.) Meanings and Prototypes: Studies in Linguistic Categorisation, Routledge: London and New York , pp. 195-210
9.
Gerrig, R. (1989) The time-course of sense creation, Memory & Cognition17: 194-207
10.
Gibbs. R. (1987) What does it mean to say that a metaphor has been understood, in R. Haskell (ed.) Cognition and Symbolic Structures: The Psychology of Metaphoric Transformations , Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey, pp. 31-48
11.
Gibbs, R. (1989) Understanding and Literal Meaning. Cognitive Science13, 243-51
12.
Gibbs, R. (1994) The Poetics of Mind: Figuratire Thought, Language. and Understanding, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
13.
Green, K. (1993) Relevance theory and the literary text: some problems and perspectives, Journal of Literary Semantics22, 107-17
14.
Haiman, J. (1980) Dictionaries and encyclopedias, Lingua50, 329-57
15.
Horn,L. ( 1985) Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity, Language61, 121-74
16.
Kiparksy, P. (1987) On theory and interpretation, in N. Fabb, D. Attridge, A. Durant and C. McCabe (eds) The Linguistics of Writing: Arguments Between Language and Literature , Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 185-98
17.
Lakoff, G. (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. The University of Chicago Press , Chicago and London
18.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live by, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London
19.
Lyons, J. ( 1977) Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
20.
Nikiforidou, K. (forthcoming) Nominalisations, metonymy and lexicographic practice , to appear in Proceedings of the Third International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Leuven, Belgium
21.
Norrick, N. (1981) Semiotic Principles in Semantic Theory, John Benjamins, Amsterdam
22.
Nunberg, G. ( 1978) The Pragmatics of Reference, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington
23.
Nunberg, G. (1979) The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: polysemy , Linguistics and Philosophy3, 143-84
24.
Nunberg, G. (1995) Transfers of meaning, Journal of Semantics12, 109-32
25.
Papafragou, A. (1995a) Metonymy and relevance, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics7, 141-75
26.
Papafragou, A. (1995b) The comprehension of metonymy. Paper presented at the Autumn Meeting of the LAGB, University of Essex
27.
Pilkington, A. (1991) The literary reading process: A relevance theory perspective, in E. Ibsch, D. Schram and G. Steen (eds) Empirical Studies of Literature: Proceedings of the 2nd IGEL Conference, Amsterdam1989, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 117-23
28.
Pilkinton, A. ( 1992) Poetic effects, Lingua87, 29-51
29.
Pilkington, A. (1994) Poetic Thoughts and Poetic Effects. Unpublished PhD thesis, University College London
30.
Reboul, A. (1990) Analyse de la métaphore et de la fiction, Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Geneva
31.
Recanati, F. ( 1993) Direct Reference: From Language to Thought, Blackwell, Oxford, Cambridge USA.
32.
Recanati, F. (1995) The alleged priority of literal interpretation . Cognitive Science19, 207-32
33.
Richards, C. (1985) Inferential pragmatics and the literary text, Journal ofPragmatics9, 261-85
34.
Rouchota, V. (1992) On the referential/attributive distinction, Lingua87, 137-67
35.
Ruhl, C. (1989) On Monosemy: A Study in Linguistic Semantics, State University of New York Press. New York
36.
Sperber, D. (1975) Rudiments de rhétorique cognitive, Poétique23, 389-415
37.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1983) Draft of Relevance, University College London ms.
38.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986, 2nd edn 1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Blackwell, Oxford
39.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1990) Rhetoric and relevance, in J. Bender and D. Wellbery (eds) The Ends of Rhetoric, Stanford University Press , pp. 140-55
40.
Sweetser, E. (1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
41.
Trotter, D. (1992) Analysing literary prose: The relevance of relevance theory, Lingua87, 11-27
42.
Ullmann, S. (1962) Semantics: An Introduction to the Science of Meaning , Blackwell, Oxford
43.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (1988) Representations and relevance, in R. Kempson (ed.) Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 133-53.
