This article examines the speech act of confession in Arthur Miller's play The Crucible, and the differing conditions under which the act occurs. By examining the confession of a black female slave which is pivotal to the plot of the play, I will argue that under Austin's rules for ‘happy’ performatives the confession is void, and that the social status of the individuals involved affects the constitutive rules governing the act of confession itself.
Austin, J.L. (1962) How to do things with Words, Oxford University Press, London
2.
Brown, G. (1977) Listening to Spoken English, Longman, London
3.
Burton, D. (1980) Dialogue and Discourse, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
4.
Coulthard, M. (1977) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis, Longman, London
5.
Elam, K. (1980) The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama, Methuen, London
6.
Fowler, R. (1986) Linguistic Criticism, Oxford University Press, Oxford
7.
Grice, H.P. (1975) ‘Logic and Conversation’ in Cole, P. and Morgan, J.L. (eds) Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 3), Academic Press, London, pp. 41–58
8.
Levinson, C. (1983) Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
9.
Miller, Arthur (1956) The Crucible, Penguin, Middlesex
10.
Searle, J.R. (1975) ‘Indirect Speech Acts’ in Cole, P. and Morgan, J.L. (eds) Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 3), Academic Press, London, pp. 41–58
11.
Short, M. (1989) ‘Discourse Analysis and the Analysis of Drama’, in Carter, R. and Simpson, P. (eds) Language Discourse and Literature, Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 139–68
