Of rhythm and texture: A cognitive aesthetics of embodiment in IA Richards’ Practical Criticism

Abstract

IA Richards’ critical output, especially in Principles of Literary Criticism (1924) and Practical Criticism (1929), is often placed at the fore of an uncomplicated trajectory from New Criticism through a series of formalist approaches to literary texts, before finally being displaced by structuralism. Less routinely, Richards has been read as an early precursor to the rise of late cognitive approaches to literary theory and analysis. This article adopts the less routine approach and, where previous considerations have been more generalist, opts to assess the more particular cognitivist inclinations in Richards’ work. It does so by, firstly, bringing together the main precepts and principles of modern theories of ‘embodied cognition’, ‘image schemata’, ‘affordances’ and ‘texture’ with relevant analogues in Richards’ work, namely the ‘experience of forms’, ‘muscular images’, ‘poise’, and finally ‘texture’ as well as ‘rhythm’. Secondly, keeping in mind this ‘cognitive aesthetic’ toolkit, a term adopted in reflection of Richards’ broad theoretical reliance on the discipline of aesthetics in particular, it evaluates Richards’ consonance with, and potential contribution to, cognitivist scholarship.

Keywords

affordances embodied cognition image schemata rhythm IA Richards texture

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Álvaro

Moreira

Lillo

, et al. (2015) Color preference in red-green dichromats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: Psychological and Cognitive Sciences 112(30): 9316–9321. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502104112

Baldick

(1983) The Social Mission of English Criticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Barry

(2009) Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. 2nd edition. Manchester University Press.

Broderick

Ne’eman

(2015) Autism as metaphor: narrative and counter-narrative. International Journal of Inclusive Education 12(5–6): 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110802377490

Bush

(1949) New criticism: some old-fashioned queries. Publications of the Modern Language Association 64(1): 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1632/s0030812900178903

Carstensen

(2007) Spatio-temporal ontologies and attention. Spatial Cognition and Computation 7(1): 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875860701337850

Craig

(1998) TS Eliot, IA Richards and empiricism’s art of memory. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 1(1): 111–135.

Devitt

Sterelny

(1999) Language and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. 2nd edition. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

Dummett

(2014) The Origins of Analytical Philosophy. London and New York: Bloomsbury.

10.

Eagleton

(2002) A good reason to murder your landlady. London Review of Books 24(8): n.p. Available at: https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v24/n08/terry-eagleton/a-good-reason-to-murder-your-landlady (accessed 27 December 2022).

11.

Eagleton

(2022) Critical Revolutionaries: Five Critics Who Changed the Way We Read. Yale University Press.

12.

Eliot

(1951 [1921]) The metaphysical poets. In: Selected Essays. 3rd edition. London: Faber and Faber, pp. 281–291.

13.

Emmott

Sanford

Morrow

(2006) Capturing the attention of readers? Stylistic and psychological perspectives on the use and effect of text fragmentation in narratives. Journal of Literary Semantics 35(1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/jls.2006.001

14.

Fry

(2008) IA richards. In: Litz

Menand

Rainey

(eds) The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Vol. 7:Modernism and the New Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1017/chol9780521300124.010

15.

Gang

(2011) Behaviorism and the beginnings of close reading. English Literary History 78(1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2011.0003

16.

Geaney

(2016) Self as container? Metaphors we lose by in understanding early Chinese texts. Antiquorum Philosophia 5: 11–30.

17.

Gere Ruggles

(2005) Seeing is/not believing: visibility, invisibility, and disability studies in education. In: Gabel

(ed) Disability Studies in Education: Readings in Theory and Method. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 53–63.

18.

Gibson

(1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Miffin.

19.

Glock

(2012) What is Analytic Philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Goodblatt

Glicksohn

(2003) From Practical Criticism to the practice of literary criticism. Poetics Today 24(2): 207–236. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-24-2-207

21.

Gordon

(2018) Reading from nowhere: assessed literary response, Practical Criticism and situated cultural literacy. English in Education 52(1): 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2018.1414408

22.

Gruener

(2013) Vincent van Gogh’s yellow vision. British Journal of General Practice 63(612): 370–371. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X669266

23.

Harrison

Nuttall

(2018) Re-reading in stylistics. Language and Literature 27(3): 176–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947018792719

24.

Inan

Boldan

(2018) Implementation of reader-response theory in teaching short story. The Literary Trek 4(2): 63–76.

25.

Jackson

(2002) Issues and problems in the blending of cognitive science, evolutionary psychology, and literary study. Poetics Today 23(1): 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-23-1-161

26.

Jackson

(2005) Explanation, interpretation, and close reading: the progress of cognitive poetics. Poetics Today 26(3): 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-26-3-519

27.

Jakobson

(1960) Closing statement: linguistics and poetics. In: Sebeok

(ed) Style in Language. Technology Press of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 350–377.

28.

Johnson

(1987) The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press.

29.

Johnson

(2007) The Meaning of the Body. University of Chicago Press.

30.

Krajco

(2008) Lighthouse writing tips. Available at: https://lighthouse-writing-tips.blogspot.com/2008/01/literary-resonance-in-art-of-writing.html (accessed 27 December 2022).

31.

Kuusela

(2019) Wittgenstein on Logic as the Method of Philosophy: Re-Examining the Roots and Development of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/book/1705/chapter/141306755 (accessed 27 December 2022).

32.

Lakoff

Johnson

(1980) Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

33.

Lakoff

Johnson

(1999) Philosophy in the Flesh. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

34.

Law

(1993) The Rhetoric of Empiricism: Language and Perception from Locke to IA Richards. Cornell University Press.

35.

Leach Scully

(2009) Disability and the thinking body. In: Kristiansen

Vehmas

Shakespeare

(eds) Arguing About Disability: Philosophical Perspectives. Routledge, pp. 57–74.

36.

Lin

Chen

Wang

(2019) Improving discrimination in colour vision deficiency by image re-colouring. Sensors 19(10): 2250. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19102250

37.

Mailloux

(1990) The turns of reader-response criticism. In: Moran

Penfield

(eds) Conversations: Contemporary Critical Theory and the Teaching of Literature. National Council of Teachers of English, pp. 38–54.

38.

Mitchell

Snyder

(2000) Narrative prosthesis and the materiality of metaphor. In: Narrative Prosthesis: Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse. University of Michigan Press, 47–64.

39.

Novina

(2020) From the linguistic turn to the cognitive turn and back again. In: Skansi

(ed) Guide to Deep Learning Basics: Logical, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. Springer Cham, pp. 13–27.

40.

Oxford English Dictionary Online (2022). Oxford University Press. Available at: https://www.oed.com/ (accessed 27 December 2022).

41.

Pietarinen

(2009) Significs and the origins of analytic philosophy. Journal of the History of Ideas 70(3): 467–490. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.0.0043

42.

Richards

(2001 [1924]) Principles of Literary Criticism. In: Constable

(ed.) IA Richards Selected Works 1919–1938. Vol. 3. London: Routledge.

43.

Richards

(2001)(1926) Review of John Watson’s Behaviourism. The New Criterion 4(2): 372–378. In: Constable J (ed.) IA Richards Selected Works 1919–1938. Vol. 9. London: Routledge, pp. 80–87.

44.

Richards

(2001 [1929]) Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgment. In: Constable

(ed.) IA Richards Selected Works 1919–1938. Vol. 4. Routledge.

45.

Richards

(1936) The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford University Press.

46.

Richards

(1973) Beginnings and transitions. Interviewed by Brower R. In: Brower

Vendler

Hollander

, et al. (eds) Essays in His Honor. Oxford University Press, pp. 17–41.

47.

Richards

Ogden

(2001 [1921]) First steps in psychology. In: Constable

(ed.) IA Richards Selected Works 1919–1938. Vol. 9. London: Routledge, pp. 36–52.

48.

Richards

Ogden

(1923) The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism. Harcourt, Brace.

49.

Richards

Ogden

Wood

(1922) The Foundations of Aesthetics. George Allen and Unwin.

50.

Robinson

(2001) The English Prophets: A Critical Defence of English Criticism. Edgeways.

51.

Robinson

(2011) FR Leavis the Cambridge don: a talk given to the University College Swansea English Society revised December 2011. In: Stotesbury

(ed) FR Leavis: Reviews and Discussions. Available at: https://www.stotesbury-reviews.com/f-r-leavis-the-cambridge-don/ (accessed 27 December 2022).

52.

Russo

(1979) A study in influence: the Moore-Richards paradigm. Critical Inquiry 5(4): 683–712. https://doi.org/10.1086/448017

53.

Russo

(2019) IA Richards. Oxford Bibliographies Online: Literary and Critical Theory. Oxford University Press, n.p.

54.

Sanford

AJS

Sanford

Molle

, et al. (2006) Shallow processing and attention capture in written and spoken discourse. Discourse Processes 42(2): 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp4202_2

55.

Sobchack

(2004) Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture. University of California Press.

56.

Stockwell

(2009) Texture: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading. Edinburgh University Press.

57.

Stockwell

(2016) Texture. In: Sotirova

(ed) The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics. Bloomsbury, pp. 458–473.

58.

Thaventhiran

(2012) War lords in the republic of letters: empson and Richards among the Mandarins. The Cambridge Quarterly 41(1): 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/camqtly/bfr041

59.

Turvey

(2010) Affordances and prospective control: an outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology 4(3): 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0403_3

60.

Varela

Thompson

Rosch

(2017) The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. 2nd edition. Massachusetts University Press.

61.

Vidali

(2010) Seeing what we know: disability and theories of metaphor. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 4(1): 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1353/jlc.0.0032

62.

Wallis

(2021) Reception theory, reception history, reception studies. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.1004 (accessed 27 December 2022).

63.

West

(2013) IA Richards and the Rise of Cognitive Stylistics. Bloomsbury.

64.

Whiteley

Canning

(2017) Reader response research in stylistics. Language and Literature 26(2): 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947017704724

65.

Williams

(1983) Cambridge English and beyond. London Review of Books 5(12): n.p. Available at: https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v05/n12/raymond-williams/cambridge-english-and-beyond (accessed 27 December 2022).