Interaction between text and reader is a prominent concern in stylistics. This paper focusses on interactions among stylistic processes and subconscious microcognitive processes that generate changes to narrative and interpretation during reading. Drawing on process philosophy and recent neuroscientific research, I articulate this dynamism through analysis of a brief narrative moment from each of The.PowerBook by Jeanette Winterson and Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood. I argue that high densities of stylistic and microcognitive perturbations lead to frequent narrative and interpretive changes in the two moments. The analyses reinforce portrayals of reading as intensely complex, dynamic and changeable. Complexity, dynamism and mutability also characterise the stylistic changes in the two narrative moments. This paper advocates greater attention to the role of volatile stylistic and cognitive microdynamics in shaping the reading of prose fiction.
AdolphsRLeonardMBarrettLF (2019) What is an emotion?Current Biology29: R1060–R1069.
2.
Alderson-DayBBerniniMFernyhoughC (2017) Uncharted features and dynamics of reading: voices, characters, and crossing of experiences. Consciousness and Cognition49: 98–109.
3.
AlexanderJDNygaardLC (2008) Reading voices and hearing text: talker-specific auditory imagery in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance34(2): 446–459.
4.
AntonovPAChakravarthiRAndersonSK (2020) Too little, too late, and in the wrong place: alpha band activity does not reflect an active mechanism of selective attention. Neuroimage219: 117006–117018.
5.
AshbyJCliftonC (2005) The prosodic property of lexical stress affects eye movements during silent reading. Cognition96(3): B89–B100.
6.
AsutayEGenevskyABarrettLFHamiltonJPSlovicPVastfjallD. (2021) Affective calculus: the construction of affect through information integration over time. Emotion21(1): 159–174.
7.
AttridgeD (2004) The Singularity of Literature. London: Routledge.
8.
AtwoodM (2003) Oryx and Crake. London: Bloomsbury.
9.
BaradK (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
10.
BarnettT (2003) The cyborg and the garden. Counterpoints3(1): 42–49.
11.
BarrettLF (2017) The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience12(1): 1833–1923.
12.
BickhardMH (2008) Issues in process metaphysics. Ecological Psychology20: 252–256.
13.
BickhardMH (2011) Systems and process metaphysics. In: HookerCA (ed), Philosophy of Complex Systems. Oxford: Elsevier, 91–104.
14.
BlomTFeuerriegelDJohnsonP, et al. (2020) Predictions drive neural representations of visual events ahead of incoming sensory information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America117(13): 7510–7515.
15.
BornsteinK (1994) Gender Outlaw: On Men, Women and the Rest of Us. New York: Routledge.
16.
BrunyéTTDitmanTGilesGE, et al. (2016) Mentally simulating narrative perspective is not universal or necessary for language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition42(10): 1592–1605.
17.
BurkeM (2017) Literary seduction: minds, bodies and non-textual phenomena. E-rea: Revue électronique d’études sur le Monde Anglophone15(1): 1–18.
18.
ButchardD (2015) Electric Amateurs: Literary Encounters with Computing Technologies 1987-2001. PhD Thesis, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
19.
CanningP (2017) Text world theory and real world readers: from literature to life in a Belfast prison. Language and Literature26(2): 172–187.
20.
CapletteLInceRAAJerbiK, et al. (2020) Disentangling presentation and processing times in the brain. Neuroimage218: 116994–117005.
21.
CaraccioloM (2014) The Experientiality of Narrative: An Enactivist Approach. Berlin: De Gruyter.
22.
CaraccioloMIonescuAFransoR (2019) Metaphorical patterns in Anthropocene fiction. Language and Literature28(3): 221–240.
23.
CarterRMcCarthyM (2006) Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
ChenC-H (2018) Subjectal scale and micro-biopolitics at the End of the Anthropocene: Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam Trilogy. Mosaic51(3): 179–198.
25.
CiobanuC (2014) Rewriting the human at the end of the Anthropocene in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam Trilogy. Minnesota Review: A Journal of Committed Writing2014: 153–162.
26.
ClarkA (2016) Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action and the Embodied Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
ClarkHHGerrigRJ (1990) Quotations as demonstrations. Language66(4): 764–805.
28.
DamesN (2007) The Physiology of the Novel: Reading, Neural Science & the Form of Victorian Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
DernerMDehnenGChaiebL, et al. (2020) Patterns of single-neuron activity during associative recognition memory in the human medial temporal lobe. Neuroimage221: 117214–117223.
30.
Droit-VoletS (2014) What emotions tell us about time. In: ArstilaVLloydD (eds), Subjective Time: the Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Temporality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 477–506.
31.
DupréJ (2017) The metaphysics of evolution. Interface Focus7(5): 1–9.
32.
DupréJNicholsonDJ (2018) A manifesto for a processual philosophy of biology. In: NicholsonDJDupréJ (eds), Everything Flows: Towards A Processual Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–45.
33.
EvansS (2010) Not unmarked’: From themed space to a feminist ethics of engagement in Atwood’s Oryx and Crake. FEMSPEC10(2): 35–58.
34.
FaberMMakMWillemsRM (2020) Word skipping as an indicator of individual reading style during literary reading. Journal of Eye Movement Research13(3): 1–9.
35.
Fernandez-QuintanillaC (2020) Textual and reader factors in narrative empathy: an empirical reader response study using focus groups. Language and Literature29(2): 124–146.
36.
FiacconiCMOwenAM (2015) Using psychophysiological measures to examine the temporal profile of verbal humor elicitation. Plos One10(9): e0135902.
37.
FodorJD (2002) Prosodic disambiguation in silent reading. Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society32(1): 113–132.
38.
FritschMHeikeLMeyerKM (2020) Scaling methods in ecological modelling. Methods in Ecology and Evolution11(11): 1368–1378.
39.
GavinsJ (2007) Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
40.
GiariGLeonardelliETaoY, et al. (2020) Spatiotemporal properties of the neural representation of conceptual content for words and pictures- an MEG study. Neuroimage219: 116913–116922.
41.
GrisotGConklinKSotirovaV (2020) Who's afraid of Virginia Woolf? Readers' responses to experimental techniques of speech, thought and consciousness presentation in Woolf'sTo the Lighthouse and Mrs Dalloway. Language and Literature, 29(2): 103–123.
42.
GuentherFHGhoshSSTourvilleJA (2006) Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain and Language96: 280–301.
43.
HardtOSossinWS (2020) Terminological and epistemological issues in current memory research. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience12(336): 336–337.
44.
HartungFBurkeMHagoortP, et al. (2016) Taking perspective: personal pronouns affect experiential aspects of literary reading. Plos One11(5): 1–18.
45.
HaylesNK (2017) Unthought: The Power of the Cognitive Unconscious. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
46.
HegartyAKYaniMSAlbishiA, et al. (2020) Salience network functional connectivity is spatially heterogeneous across sensorimotor cortex in health humans. Neuroimage221: 117177–117186.
47.
HermanD (2002) Story Logic. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
48.
HicksHJ (2016) The Post-Apocalyptic Novel in the Twenty-First Century: Modernity Beyond Salvage. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
49.
HoganPC (2011) Affective Narratology: The Emotional Structure of Stories. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
50.
HoganPC (2014) Literary brains: neuroscience, criticism, and theory. Literature Compass11(4): 293–304.
51.
HohwyJ (2020) New directions in predictive processing. Mind and Language35: 209–223.
52.
HookerC (2011) Introduction to philosophy of complex systems A. In: HookerCA (ed), Philosophy of Complex Systems. Oxford: Elsevier, 3–90.
53.
ImS-hVarmaS (2018) Distorted time perception during flow as revealed by an attention-demanding cognitive task. Creativity Research Journal30(3): 295–304.
54.
JosephHSSLWonnacottEForbesP, et al. (2014) Becoming a written word: eye movements reveal order of acquisition effect following incidental exposure to new words during silent reading. Cognition133(1): 238–248.
55.
KeenS (2007) Empathy and the Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
KeidelJLDavisPMGonzalez-DiazV, et al. (2013) How Shakespeare tempests the brain: neuroimaging insights. Cortex49(4): 913–919.
57.
KisslerJHerbertCPeykP, et al. (2007) Buzzwords: early cortical responses to emotional words during reading. Psychological Science18(6): 475–480.
58.
KlitgårdI (2006) “The irresistible tug of the tides”: the Danish translations of stylistic shapeshifting in the “Proteus” episode of James Joyce'sUlysses, Language and Literature, 15(2): 141–158.
59.
KouniosJBeemanM (2009) The Aha! moment. Current Directions in Psychological Science18(4): 210–216.
60.
KruikovaOManiN (2016) Processing metrical information in silent reading: an ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology7: 1–8.
61.
KukkonenK (2020) Probability Designs: Literature and Predictive Processing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62.
LewinR (1992) Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos. New York: Collier Books.
63.
McAvanE (2020) Jeanette Winterson and Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
64.
MacGregorLJRoddJMGilbertRA, et al. (2020) The neural time course of semantic ambiguity resolution in speech comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience32(3): 403–425.
65.
McHaleB (2008) Beginning to think about narrative in poetry. Narrative17(1): 11–27.
66.
MartínJ (2019) Dystopia, feminism and phallogocentrism in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake. Open Cultural Studies3(1): 174–181.
67.
MartinezM-AHermanL (2020) Real readers reading Wasco’s “City”; a storyworld possible selves approach. Language and Literature29(2): 147–170.
68.
MohrDM (2015) Eco-dystopia and biotechnology: Margaret Atwood, Oryx and Crake (2003), The Year of the Flood (2009), and MaddAddam (2013). In: VoigtsEBollerA (eds), Dystopia, Science Fiction, Post-Apocalypse: Classics-New Tendencies-Model Interpretations. Trier, Germany: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier (WVT), 283–301.
69.
MoriYIshiiK (2018) The effect of speaker-specific auditory images on reading in Japanese. Current Psychology39: 2343–2350.
70.
NaniAManuelloJMancusoL, et al. (2019) The neural correlates of consciousness and attention: two sister processses of the brain. Frontiers in Neuroscience13: 1–18.
71.
NastaseSAGoldsteinAHassonU (2020) Keep it real: rethinking the primacy of experimental control in cognitive neuroscience. Neuroimage222: 117254–117261.
OlingerAR (2016) A sociocultural approach to style. Rhetoric Review35(2): 121–134.
74.
OrrMGLebiereCStoccoA, et al. (2019) Multi-scale resolution of neural, cognitive and social systems. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory25(1): 4–23.
75.
ØstergaardS (2003) The conceptualisation of processes. In: SeibtJ (ed), Process Theories: Crossdisciplinary Studies in Dynamic Categories. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 77–96.
76.
PaganNO (2018) ‘Why read literature?’: appeasing the appetite for play. Journal of Language, Literature and Culture65(1): 11–22.
77.
Susan PelleS (2012) When is a tulip not a tulip’: Grafting, exoticism, and pleasure gardens in Jeanette Winterson’s The PowerBook. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies33(3): 31–52.
78.
PeplowDCarterR (2014) Stylistics and real readers. In: BurkeM (ed), The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. Abingdon: Routledge, 440–454.
79.
PetitmenginCLachauxJP (2013) Microcognitive science: bridging experiential and neuronal microdynamics. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience7: 617–626.
80.
PfeifferCHollensteinNZhangC, et al. (2020) Neural dynamics of sentiment processing during naturalistic sentence reading. Neuroimage218: 116934–116949.
81.
PulvermüllerFFadigaL (2010) Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nature Reviews Neurosicence11(5): 351–360.
82.
QiuJLiHJouJ, et al. (2010) Neural correlates of the ‘‘Aha’’ experiences: evidence from an fMRI study of insight problem solving. Cortex46: 397–403.
83.
SeibtJ (2003) Introduction. In: SeibtJ (ed), Process Theories: Cross Diciplinary Studies on Dynamic Categories. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, vii–xxiii.
SerenoSCHandCJShahidA, et al. (2018) Testing the limits of contextual constraint: interactions with word frequency and parafoveal preview during fluent reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology71(1): 302–313.
86.
ShenWTongYYuanY, et al. (2018) Feeling the insight: uncovering somatic markers of the 'aha' experience. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback43(1): 13–21.
87.
SlowiaczekMLCliftonC (1980) Subvocalization and reading for meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior19(5): 573–582.
88.
StewartG (1990) Reading Voices: Literature and the Phonotext. Berkeley: University of California Press.
89.
StockwellP (2020) Literary dialect as social deixis. Language and Literature29(4): 358–372.
90.
TaylorJNPerfettiCA (2016) Eye movements reveal readers’ lexical quality and reading experience. Reading and Writing29(6): 1069–1103.
91.
TenenbergJKnobelsdorfM (2014) Out of our minds: a review of sociocultural cognition theory. Computer Science Education24(1): 1–24.
92.
TerhuneDBCroucherMMarcusson-ClavertzDMacdonaldJSP (2017) Time contracts and temporal precision declines when the mind wanders. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance43(11): 1864–1871.
93.
TrosciankoET (2017) Feedback in reading and disordered eating. In: BurkeMTrosciankoET (eds), Cognitive Literary Science: Dialogues between Literature and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 169–194.
94.
UnderwoodT (2018) Why literary time is measured in minutes. ELH: English Literary History85(2): 341–365.
95.
VilhauerRP (2016) Inner reading voices: an overlooked form of inner speech. Psychosis8(1): 37–47.
96.
VilhauerRP (2017) Characteristics of inner reading voices. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology58(4): 269–274.
97.
VogelzangMHendriksPvan RijnH (2016) Pupillary responses reflect ambiguity resolution in pronoun processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience31(7): 876–885.
98.
Wagner-LawlorJ (2009) Lusting toward utopia: Jeanette Winteron’s utopian counter-spaces from The Passion to The PowerBook. In: SönmezMJKilic˛MÖ (eds), Winterson Narrating Time and Space. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 65–84.
99.
WalesK (2014) The stylistic tool-kit: methods and sub-disciplines. In: StockwellPWhitelyS (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 32–45.
100.
WangR-S (2013) Perturbation. In: DubitskyWWolkenhauerOChoK, et al. (eds), Encyclopedia of Systems Biology. New York: Springer, 1680–1681.
101.
WaughP (1984) Metafiction: The Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Fiction. London: Routledge.
102.
WesselJR (2018) A neural mechanism for surprise-related interruptions of visuospatial working memory. Cerebral Cortex28(1): 199–212.
103.
WintersonJ (2001) The.PowerBook. London: Vintage.
104.
YaoB (2021) Mental simulations of phonological representations are causally linked to silent reading of direct versus indirect speech. Journal of Cognition4(1): 6–14.
105.
YaoBScheepersC (2011) Contextual modulation of reading rate for direct versus indirect speech quotations. Cognition121(3): 447–453.
106.
YaoBScheepersC (2018) Direct speech quotations promote low relative-clause attachment in silent reading of English. Cognition176: 248–254.
107.
ZhangMLuAHodgesBH (2019) Lifting, tasting and carrying: the interaction of magnitude and valence effects in time perception. Acta Psychologica193: 1–10.
108.
ZhangMVargaDWangX, et al. (2021) Knowing what you need to know in advance: the neural processes underpinning flexible semantic retrieval of thematic and taxonomic relations. Neuroimage224: 117405–117422.
