Moderating readers and reading online

Abstract

Despite the proliferation of online forums for the discussion of literary texts, very little has been written to date on the management of these spaces and how this helps frame the kinds of discussion and interpretative work that take place. This article draws on a series of interviews with moderators of online book-related sites, alongside close analysis of online interactions between moderators and users to consider issues of authority, hierarchy, power and control, asking how these act to structure or facilitate acts of interpretation taking place online.

We begin by outlining the moderator’s role before conducting a brief review of existing scholarship on offline reading groups and online communities, to identify how social infrastructures are established and negotiated. The main body of the article draws upon interviews with moderators of two online literary forums – The Republic of Pemberley and The Guardian’s online Reading Group – to explore the ways in which each of the respective moderators frames his or her role. This is accompanied by an in-depth exploration of how the forms of interpretation we find on the two sites are shaped and directed by the moderators. The article concludes by reflecting upon some of the issues raised by this study and its methodology, particularly with regards to digital dualism and the blurring of the boundaries between the public and the private in online spaces.

Keywords

Moderators interpretation interpretive communities social reading reading formations digital dualism internet studies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allington

(2011) Distinction, intentions, and the consumption of fiction: Negotiating cultural legitimacy in a gay reading group. European Journal of Cultural Studies 14(2): 129–145.

Allington

(2012) Private experience, textual analysis, and institutional authority: The discursive practice of critical interpretation and its enactment in literary training. Language and Literature 21(2): 211–225.

Allington

Benwell

(2012) Reading the reading experience: An ethnomethodological approach to ‘Booktalk’. In: Lang

(ed) From Codex to Hypertext: Reading at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, pp.217–233.

Bennett

Woollacott

(1987) Bond and Beyond: The Political Career of a Popular Hero. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Boyarin

(ed) (1993) The Ethnography of Reading. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

Brown

Levinson

(1978) Universals in language use: Politeness phenomena. In: Goody

(ed.) Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.56–311.

Collins

(1992) Flaming: The relationship between social context cues and uninhibited verbal behaviour in computer-mediated communication. Available at: https://www.mediensprache.net/archiv/pubs/2842.htm (accessed 5 May 2015).

Daniels

(2002) Literature Circles: Voice and Choice in Book Clubs and Reading Groups. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.

Fish

(1980) Is There a Text in this Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

10.

Fish

(1990) Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

11.

Fister

(2005) Reading as a contact sport: Online book groups and the social dimensions of reading. Reference and User Services Quarterly 44(4): 303–309.

12.

Fuller

Rehberg Sedo

(2013) Reading Beyond the Book: The Social Practices of Contemporary Literary Culture. London: Routledge.

13.

Goffman

(1955) On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry 18(3): 213–31.

14.

Grimmelmann

(2015) The virtues of moderation. Yale Journal of Learning and Technology 17. Available at: http://james.grimmelmann.net/files/articles/virtues-of-moderation.pdf (accessed 27 May 2015).

15.

Habermas

(1990) Discourse ethics: Notes on a program of philosophical justification. In: Lenhart

Weber Nicholson

(trans) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.43–115.

16.

Hartley

(2001) Reading Groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

17.

Hirsch

(1967) Validity in Interpretation. New Haven, CO: Yale University Press.

18.

Jenkins

(2006) Convergence Culture: When Old and New Media Collide. New York, NY: New York University Press.

19.

Johnson

(2007) Fan-tagonism: Factions, institutions, and constitutive hegemonies of fandom. In: Gray

Sandvoss

Harrington

(eds) Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World. New York, NY: New York University Press, pp.285–300.

20.

Kendall

McDougall

(2011) Different spaces, same old stories? On being a reader in the Richard and Judy Book Club. In: Cousins

Ramone

(eds) The Richard and Judy Book Club Reader. Farnham: Ashgate, pp.59–74.

21.

Kozinets

(2010) Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: Sage Publications.

22.

Lévy

(1997) Collective Intelligence: Mankind’s Emerging World in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

23.

Long

(1986) Women, reading and authority: Some implications of the audience perspective in cultural studies. American Quarterly 38(4): 591–612.

24.

Page

(2011) Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interactions. London: Routledge.

25.

Peplow

(2011) ‘Oh, I’ve known a lot of Irish people’: Reading groups and the negotiation of literary interpretation. Language and Literature 20(4): 295–315.

26.

Rowberry

(2016) Commonplacing the public domain: Reading the classics socially on the Kindle. Language and Literature 25(3): 211–225.

27.

Stockwell

(2016) The texture of authorial intention. In: Gavins

Lahey

(eds) World Building: Discourse in the Mind. London: Bloomsbury, pp.147–163.

28.

Thomas

(2007) Canons and fanons: Literary fanfiction online. Dichtung Digital 37. Available at: http://www.dichtung-digital.org/2007/thomas.htm (accessed 27 May 2015).

29.

Thomas

(2012) Kicking the hornet’s nest: The rhetoric of social campaigning in Stieg Larsson’s Millennium trilogy. Language and Literature 21(3): 299–310.

30.

Thomas

Round

(2012) Website survey summary. Available at: http://www.researchingreadersonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/website-survey-summary.pdf (accessed 9 December 2015).

31.

Tulloch

Jenkins

(1995) Science Fiction Audiences. London: Routledge.

32.

Wanner

(2005) Creating comfort zones of orality in online discussion forums. In: Sieloff Magnan

(ed) Mediating Discourse Online. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.125–152.

33.

Whiteley

(2011) Text world theory, real readers and emotional responses to ‘The Remains of the Day’. Language and Literature 20(1): 23–41.

34.

Whiteman

(2007) The Establishment, Maintenance and Destabilisation of Fandom. PhD Thesis, Institute of Education, University of London, UK.

35.

Wimsatt

Beardsley

(1946) The intentional fallacy. Sewanee Review 54: 468–88.

36.

Worth

(2005) Foreign language resistance: Discourse analysis of online classroom peer interaction. In: Sieloff Magnan

(ed) Mediating Discourse Online. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.245–274.