AldamaFL (2013) What the brain sciences might tell us about our making of and engaging with strange fictions. Style47(3): 283–294.
2.
BellA (2013) Unnatural narration in hypertext fiction. In: AlberJSkov NielsenHRichardsonB (eds) A Poetics of Unnatural Narrative. Ohio State University Press, 185–198.
3.
BenczesR (2013) The role of alliteration and rhyme in novel metaphorical and metonymical compounds. Metaphor and Symbol28(1): 167–184.
4.
BernaertsLDe GeestD. (eds) (2013) Stories and Minds: Cognitive Approaches to Literary Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
5.
BertelsASpeelmanD (2013) ‘Keywords Method’ versus ‘Calcul des Spécificités’: a comparison of tools and methods. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics18(4): 536–560.
6.
BortolussiMDixonP (2013) Minding the text: Memory for literary narrative. In: BernaertsLDe GeestD. (eds) Stories and Minds: Cognitive Approaches to Literary Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 23–37.
7.
BurkeM (2013) The rhetorical neuroscience of style: On the primacy of style elements during literary discourse processing. Journal of Literary Semantics42(2): 199–216.
8.
BurkeM (2014) The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. Abingdon: Routledge.
9.
BurkeMTrosciankoE (eds) (2013a) Special Issue: Explorations in Cognitive Literary Science. Journal of Literary Semantics42(2): 141–222.
10.
BurkeMTrosciankoET (2013b) Mind, brain, and literature: A dialogue on what the humanities might offer the cognitive sciences. Journal of Literary Semantics42(2): 141–148.
11.
Burton-RobertsG (2013) On Grice and cancellation. Journal of Pragmatics48: 17–28.
12.
CapleH (2013) Competing for coverage: Exploring emerging discourses on female athletes in the Australian print media. English Text Construction6(2): 271–294.
13.
CaraccioloM (2013a) Text World Theory and Keats’s Poetry. London: Bloomsbury.
14.
CaraccioloM (2013b) Blind reading: toward an enactivist theory of the reader’s imagination. In: BernaertsLDe GeestDetal. (eds) Stories and Minds: Cognitive Approaches to Literary Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 81–105.
15.
CarpenterRCaudle TraversC (2013) When ‘surge’ signifies rapid increases of American combatants sent to foreign warfare: Classical enargia for contemporary metaphor. Style47(3): 315–332.
16.
CastiglioneD (2013) The semantics of difficult poems: Deriving a checklist of linguistic phenomena. Journal of Literary Semantics42(1): 115–140.
17.
ClarkB (2013) Relevance Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
DeignanALittlemoreJSeminoE (2013) Figurative Language, Genre and Register. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
DjikicMOatleyKMoldoveanuMC (2013) Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature3(1): 28–47.
20.
EmmottCSandfordAAlexanderM (2013) Rhetorical control of readers’ attention: Psychological perspectives on foreground and background in narratives. In: BernaertsLDe GeestDetal. (eds) Stories and Minds: Cognitive Approaches to Literary Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 39–57.
21.
FeistJ (2013) ‘Sound symbolism’ in English. Journal of Pragmatics45: 104–118.
22.
FowlerR (1986) Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
FriginalE (2013a) Special issue: Twenty-five years of Biber’s Multi-Dimensional Analysis. Corpora8(2): 137–280.
24.
FriginalE (2013b) Twenty-five years of Biber’s Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Introduction to the special issue and an interview with Douglas Biber. Corpora8(2): 137–152.
25.
GavinsJ (2013) Reading the Absurd. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
26.
GayM-A (2013) Breach of contract: Pragmatic variations on a theme in Richard Ford’s short story ‘Privacy’. Études de Stylistique Anglaise4: 119–132.
27.
GrabowskiL (2013) Interfacing corpus linguistics and computational stylistics: Translation universals in translational literary Polish. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics18(2): 254–280.
28.
GraingerK (2013) Of babies and bath water: Is there any place for Austin and Grice in interpersonal pragmatics?Journal of Pragmatics58: 27–38.
29.
HamiltonC (2013) ‘The rhetoric of text’ reconsidered in fiction and autobiography. Études de Stylistique Anglaise4: 43–54.
30.
HaughtC (2013) A tale of two tropes: How metaphor and simile differ. Metaphor and Symbol28(1): 254–274.
31.
HoganPC (2013) Parallel processing and the human mind: Re-understanding consciousness with James Joyce’sUlysses. Journal of Literary Semantics42(2): 149–164.
32.
HunstonS (2007) Semantic prosody revisited. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics12(2): 249–268.
JeffriesL (2013) Readers and point-of-view in contemporary poems: A question of pronouns. Études de Stylistique Anglaise4: 175–190.
35.
JobertM (2013) Total report in Alan Bennett’s ‘A cream cracker under the settee’. Études de Stylistique Anglaise4: 163–174.
36.
JobertMMallierCMcIntyreD (eds) (2013) Style in Fiction Today. Special issue of Études de Stylistique Anglaise4.
37.
Jobert-MartiniV (2013) Readerly involvement in the first chapter of Edna O’Brien’sThe Country Girls. Études de Stylistique Anglaise4: 107–118.
38.
JohnsonDR (2013) Transportation into literary fiction reduces prejudice against and increases empathy for Arab-Muslims. Scientific Study of Literature3(1): 72–92.
39.
KecskesI (ed.) (2013) Special Issue: Focus on the speaker. Journal of Pragmatics48: 1–122.
40.
LeechG (2013) Virginia Woolf meets Wmatrix. Études de Stylistique Anglaise4: 15–26.
41.
LeechGShortM (2007 [1981]) Style in Fiction. London: Longman.
42.
MahlbergM (2013a) Corpus analysis of literary texts. In: ChappelleCA (ed.) Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1282–1289.
43.
MahlbergM (2013b) Corpus Stylistics and Dickens’s Fiction. Abingdon: Routledge.
44.
MahlbergMSmithCPrestonS (2013) Phrases in literary contexts: Patterns and distributions of suspensions in Dickens’s novels. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics18(1): 35–56.
45.
Majola-LeblondC (2013) The three S’s of stylistics. Études de Stylistique Anglaise4: 55–66.
46.
MallierC (2013) The meaning of concessive clauses in Jim Harrison’s work: A grammatical reading of mind style. Études de Stylistique Anglaise4: 81–94.
47.
McEneryTHardieA (2012) Corpus Linguistics: Theory, Method, Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
McIntyreD (2013a) Language and style in David Peace’s1974: a corpus-informed analysis. Études de Stylistique Anglaise4: 133–146.
49.
McIntyreD (2013b) Corpora and literature. In: ChappelleC. (ed.) Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 1182–1187.
50.
McIntyreD (2013c) The year’s work in stylistics 2012. Language and Literature22(4): 349–356.
51.
MilojkovicM (2013) Is corpus stylistics bent on self-improvement? The role of reference corpora 20 years after the advent of semantic prosody. Journal of Literary Semantics42(2): 59–78.
52.
MouniéM-P (2013) Imitation, style, fiction: Ethics of writing, ethics of reading in Chatterton, by Peter Ackroyd. Études de Stylistique Anglaise4: 147–162.
53.
NeillA (2013) Developing nonsense in Alice tales. Style47(3): 382–398.
54.
PageR (2013) Seriality and nonfiction narrative in social media. Storyworlds5: 31–53.
55.
PageRHarperRFrobeniusM (2013) From small stories to networked narrative: The evolution of personal narratives in Facebook status updates. Narrative Inquiry23(1): 192–213.
56.
ParadisCEeg-OlofssonM (2013) Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews. Metaphor and Symbol28(1): 22–40.
57.
ParkJ Sung-Yul (2013) Stance, style, and vocal mimicry. Journal of Pragmatics53: 84–95.
58.
PelkeyJ (2013) Cognitive chiasmus: Embodied phenomenology in Dylan Thomas. Journal of Literary Semantics42(1): 79–114.
59.
PillièreL (2013) Mind style: deviance from the norm?Études de Stylistique Anglaise4: 67–80.
60.
PolvinenM (2013) Affect and artifice in cognitive literary theory. Journal of Literary Semantics42(2): 165–180.
61.
QuaglioP (2009) Television Dialogue: The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
62.
RinzlerS (2013) Coetzee’s style in Disgrace. Études de Stylistique Anglaise4: 176–204.
63.
RomeroEBelénS (2013) Anomaly in novel metaphor and experimental tests. Journal of Literary Semantics42(1): 31–58.
64.
RühlemannC (2013) Narrative in English Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
SeminoEDeignanALittlemoreJ (2013) Metaphor, genre, and recontextualization. Metaphor and Symbol28(1): 41–59.
66.
ShortM (2013) Discourse presentation and speech (and writing but not thought) summary. Études de Stylistique Anglaise4: 27–42.
67.
SklarH (2013) The Art of Sympathy in Fiction: Forms of Ethical and Emotional Persuasion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
68.
SotirovaV (2013) Consciousness in Modernist Fiction: A Stylistic Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
69.
SotirovaV (forthcoming) The Continuum Companion to Stylistics. London: Continuum.
70.
StockwellPWhiteleyS (2014) The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71.
SullivanK (2013) Frames and Constructions in Metaphoric Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
72.
TaylorC (2013) Searching for similarity using corpus-assisted discourse studies. Corpora8(1): 81–113.
73.
ToolanM (2013) Is style in short fiction different from style in long fiction?Études de Stylistique Anglaise4: 95–106.
74.
TrosciankoET (2013) Reading imaginatively: The imagination in cognitive science and cognitive literary studies. Journal of Literary Semantics42(2): 181–198.
75.
TsiplakouSFlorosG (2013) Never mind the text types, here’s textual force: Towards a pragmatic reconceptualization of text type. Journal of Pragmatics45: 119–130.
76.
TsurR (2013) Where do conventions come from? Constraints or plasticity of the human brain follow-up note. Style47(3): 275–282.
77.
VanclayJ (2012) Impact factor: Outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?Scientometrics92(2): 211–238.
78.
VerdonkP (2013) The Stylistics of Poetry: Context, Cognition, Discourse, History. London: Bloomsbury.
79.
VesseyR (2013) Challenges in cross-linguistic corpus-assisted discourse studies. Corpora8(2): 1–26.
80.
WillemsRM (2013) Coda: Can literary studies contribute to cognitive neuroscience?Journal of Literary Semantics42(2): 217–222.