AbbotMForcevilleC (2011) Visual representation of emotion in manga: loss of control is loss of hands in Azumanga Daioh Volume 4. Language and Literature20(2): 91–112.
2.
AdlerS (2011) Silence in the graphic novel. Journal of Pragmatics43(9): 2278–2285.
3.
AllingtonD (2011) ‘It actually painted a picture of the village and the sea and the bottom of the sea’: Reading groups, cultural legitimacy, and description in narrative (with particular reference to John Steinbeck’s The Pearl). Language and Literature20(4): 317–332.
4.
Alvarez-PereyreM (2011) Using film as linguistic specimen: Theoretical and practical issues. In: PiazzaRBednarekMRossiF (eds) Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 47–68.
5.
AndersonTCrossleyS (2011) ‘Rue with a difference’: A computational stylistic analysis of the rhetoric of suicide in Hamlet. In: RavassatMCulpeperJ (eds) Stylistics and Shakespeare: Transdisciplinary Approaches. London: Continuum, pp. 192–214.
6.
ArcherDGrundyP (eds) (2011) The Pragmatics Reader. Abingdon: Routledge.
7.
BednarekM (2011a) The stability of the televisual character: A corpus stylistic case study. In: PiazzaRBednarekMRossiF (eds) Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 185–204.
8.
BednarekM (2011b) Expressivity and televisual characterization. Language and Literature20(1): 3–22.
9.
BednarekM (2011c) The language of fictional television: A case study of the ‘dramedy’Gilmore Girls. English Text Construction4(1): 54–84.
10.
BellA (2011) Re-constructing Babel: Discourse analysis, hermeneutics and the interpretive arc. Discourse Studies13(5): 519–568.
11.
BiberD (2011) Corpus stylistics and the study of literature: Back to the future?Scientific Study of Literature1(1): 15–23.
12.
BousfieldDMcIntyreD (2011) Emotion and empathy in Martin Scorsese’s Goodfellas: A case study of the ‘funny guy’ scene. In: PiazzaRBednarekMRossiF (eds) Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 105–123.
13.
BoyangLRiedlMO (2011) Creative gadget design in fictions: Generalized planning in analogical spaces. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition, pp. 41–50.
14.
BrayJ (2011) Only Revolutions and the drug of rereading. In: BrayJGibbonsA (eds) Mark Z. Danielewski. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 200–215.
15.
BrayJGibbonsA (eds) (2011) Mark Z. Danielewski. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
16.
BrownPLevinsonSC (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
BurkeM (2011) Literary Reading, Cognition and Emotion: An Exploration of the Oceanic Mind. Abingdon: Routledge.
18.
BurrowsJF (1987) Computation into Criticism: A Study of Jane Austen’s Novels and an Experiment in Method. Oxford: Clarendon.
19.
BusseB (2011a) writing is medicine: Blending cognitive and corpus stylistics. In: CalliesMKellerWRLohöferA (eds) Bi-Directionality in the Cognitive Sciences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 121–158.
20.
BusseB (2011b) Teaching the stylistics of drama. In: JeffriesLMcIntyreD (eds) Teaching Stylistics. Basingstoke: English Subject Centre/Palgrave, pp. 152–177.
21.
CalliesMKellerWRLohöferA (eds) (2011) Bi-Directionality in the Cognitive Sciences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
22.
CaraccioloM (2011) Another fusion taking place: Blending and interpretation. Journal of Literary Semantics40(2): 177–193.
ChesnokovaAYakubaV (2011) Using stylistics to teach literature to non-native speakers. In: JeffriesLMcIntyreD (eds) Teaching Stylistics. Basingstoke: English Subject Centre/Palgrave, pp. 95–108.
25.
ClarkB (2011) Recent developments in relevance theory. In GrundyP.ArcherD (eds.) The Pragmatics Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 129–137.
26.
CookA (2011) Cognitive interplay: How blending theory and cognitive science reread Shakespeare. In: RavassatMCulpeperJ (eds) Stylistics and Shakespeare: Transdisciplinary Approaches. London: Continuum, pp. 246–268.
27.
CouplandN (2007) Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
CrystalDDavyD (1969) Investigating English Style. London: Longman.
29.
CulpeperJ (2011a) Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show The Weakest Link. In: ArcherDGrundyP (eds) The Pragmatics Reader. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 321–328.
30.
CulpeperJ (2011b) Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
DawkinsR (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
DemjénS (2011) The role of second person narration in representing mental states in Sylvia Plath’s Smith Journal. Journal of Literary Semantics40(1): 1–21.
33.
DevyaniS (2011) Style repertoire and social change in British Asian English. Journal of Sociolinguistics15(4): 464–492.
34.
DixonPBortolussiM (2011) The scientific study of literature: What can, has, and should be done. Scientific Study of Literature1(1): 59–71.
35.
ElliotWEYValenzaRJ (2011) Shakespeare’s vocabulary: Did it dwarf all others? In: RavassatMCulpeperJ (eds) Stylistics and Shakespeare: Transdisciplinary Approaches. London: Continuum, pp. 34–57.
36.
EnsslinA (2011) The Language of Gaming. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
37.
EvansM (2011) This haunted house: Intertextuality and interpretation in Mark Danielewski’s House of Leaves (2000) and Poe’s Haunted (2000). In: BrayJGibbonsA (eds) Mark Z. Danielewski. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 68–85.
38.
FinneganR (2011) Why Do We Quote? The Culture and History of Quotation. Cambridge: Open Book Publications.
39.
ForcevilleC (2011) Pictorial runes in Tintin and the Picaros. Journal of Pragmatics43(3): 875–890.
40.
FurlongA (2011) The soul of wit: A relevance theoretic discussion. Language and Literature20(2): 136–150.
41.
GerrigR (2011) Individual differences in readers’ narrative experiences. Scientific Study of Literature1(1): 88–94.
42.
GibbonsA (2011) Multimodality, Cognition and Literature. Abingdon: Routledge.
43.
GregoriouC (2011) Language, Ideology and Identity in Serial Killer Narratives. Abingdon: Routledge.
44.
GoddardA (2011) ‘Type you soon!’ A stylistic approach to language use in a virtual learning environment. Language and Literature20(3): 184–200.
45.
GronasM (2011) Cognitive Poetics and Cultural Memory: Russian Literary Mnemonics. Abingdon: Routledge.
46.
HamiltonC (2011) Allegory, blending, and censorship in modern literature. Journal of Literary Semantics40(1): 23–42.
47.
HanC (2011) Reading Chinese online entertainment news: Metaphor and language play. Journal of Pragmatics43(14): 3473–3488.
48.
HermanD (2011) Post-Cartesian approaches to narrative and mind. Style45(2): 265–271.
49.
HoY (2011) Corpus Stylistics in Principles and Practice: A Stylistic Exploration of John Fowles’The Magus. London: Continuum.
50.
JayalakashmiGD (2011) The first three minutes: Seducing the audience in Arranged Marriage. In: SwannJPopeRCarterRCreativity in Language and Literature: The State of the Art. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 195–202.
51.
JeffriesL (2011) Teaching the stylistics of poetry. In: JeffriesLMcIntyreD (eds) Teaching Stylistics. Basingstoke: English Subject Centre/Palgrave, pp. 127–151.
52.
JeffriesLMcIntyreD (eds) (2011) Teaching Stylistics. Basingstoke: English Subject Centre/Palgrave.
53.
KanelosP (2011) ‘If I break time’: Shakespearean line endings on the page and the stage. In: RavassatMCulpeperJ (eds) Stylistics and Shakespeare: Transdisciplinary Approaches. London: Continuum, pp. 84–97.
54.
KirkhamS (2011) Personal style and epistemic stance in classroom discussion. Language and Literature20(3): 201–217.
55.
KnightsBSteadman-JonesR (2011) Special Issue: Stylistic Analysis and Pedagogical Research. Language and Literature20(3): 179–265.
56.
KöppeTStühringJ (2011) Against pan-narrator theories. Journal of Literary Semantics40(1): 59–80.
57.
LambrouM (2011) Teaching non-literary stylistics. In: JeffriesLMcIntyreD (eds) Teaching Stylistics. Basingstoke: English Subject Centre/Palgrave, pp. 200–220.
58.
MahlbergMMcIntyreD (2011) A case for corpus stylistics: Analysing Ian Fleming’s Casino Royale. English Text Construction4(2): 204–227.
59.
MargolinM (2011) Necessarily a narrator or narrator if necessary: A short note on a long subject words. Journal of Literary Semantics40(1): 43–57.
60.
McIntyreD (2010) The year’s work in stylistics 2009. Language and Literature19(4): 396–411.
61.
McIntyreDWalkerB (2011) Discourse presentation in Early Modern English writing: A preliminary corpus-based investigation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics16(1): 101–130.
62.
MiallD (2011) Science in the perspective of literariness. Scientific Study of Literature1(1): 7–14.
63.
MickC (2011) Discourses of ‘border-crossers’: Peruvian domestic workers in Lima as social actors. Discourse Studies13(2): 189–209.
64.
MontoroR (2011) Multimodal realisations of mind style in Enduring Love. In: PiazzaRBednarekMRossiF (eds) Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 69–84.
65.
MontoroR (forthcoming) Stylistics. The Year’s Work in English Studies91(1).
66.
NørgaardN (2011) Teaching multimodal stylistics. In: JeffriesLMcIntyreD (eds) Teaching Stylistics. Basingstoke: English Subject Centre/Palgrave, pp. 221–238.
67.
OatleyK (2011) The reader and the space-in-between. Style45(2): 330–332.
68.
O’HalloranKA (2011) Investigating argumentation in reading groups: Combining manual qualitative coding and automated corpus analysis tools. Applied Linguistics32(2): 172–119.
69.
OrtizM (2011) Primary metaphors and monomodal visual metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics43(6): 1568–1580.
70.
PalmerA (2011) Social minds in fiction and criticism. Style45(2): 196–240.
71.
PeplowD (2011) ‘Oh, I’ve known a lot of Irish people’. Reading groups and the negotiation of literary interpretation. Language and Literature20(4): pp. 295–314.
72.
PiazzaR (2011) Pragmatic deviance in realist horror films: A look at films by Argento and Fincher. In: PiazzaRBednarekMRossiF (eds) Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 85–104.
73.
PiazzaRBednarekMRossiF (eds) (2011) Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
74.
PopeR (2011) Prologue. In: SwannJPopeRCarterR (eds) Creativity in Language and Literature: The State of the Art. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. xvi–xviii.
75.
PopeRSwannJ (2011) Introduction: Creativity, language, literature. In: SwannJPopeRCarterR (2011) Creativity in Language and Literature: The State of the Art. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 1–22.
76.
RavassatMCulpeperJ (eds) (2011) Stylistics and Shakespeare: Transdisciplinary Approaches. London: Continuum.
77.
RossiF (2011) Discourse analysis of film dialogues: Italian comedy between linguistic realism and pragmatic non-realism. In: PiazzaRBednarekMRossiF (eds) Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 21–46.
78.
SeminoE (2011a) Metaphor, creativity, and the experience of pain across genres. In: SwannJPopeRCarterR (eds) Creativity in Language and Literature: The State of the Art. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 83–102.
79.
SeminoE (2011b) The adaptation of metaphors across genres. Review of Cognitive Linguistics9(1): 130–152.
80.
ShortMMcIntyreDJeffriesL. (2011) Processes of interpretation: Using meta-analysis to inform pedagogic practice. In: JeffriesLMcIntyreD (eds) Teaching Stylistics. Basingstoke: Palgrave/English Subject Centre, pp. 69–94.
81.
SimpsonP (2003) On the Discourse of Satire. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
82.
SimpsonP (2011) ‘That’s not ironic, that’s just stupid’: towards an eclectic account of the discourse of irony. In: DynelM (ed.) The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 22–41.
83.
SotirovaV (2011) D. H. Lawrence and Narrative Viewpoint. London: Continuum.
84.
SteenG (2011) Genre between the humanities and the sciences. In: CalliesMKellerWRLohöferA (eds) Bi-Directionality in the Cognitive Sciences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 21–42.
85.
StefanowitschA (2011) Cognitive linguistics as a cognitive science. In: CalliesMKellerWRLohöferA (eds) Bi-Directionality in the Cognitive Sciences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 295–310.
86.
StockwellP (2011a) Authenticity and creativity in reading lamentation. In: SwannJPopeRCarterR (eds) Creativity in Language and Literature: The State of the Art. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 203–216.
87.
StockwellP (2011b) Ethics and imagination in literary reading. In: JonesR (ed.) Discourse and Creativity. London: Pearson, pp. 35–51.
88.
SwannJAllingtonD (eds) (2009) Special Issue: Literary Reading as Social Practice. Language and Literature18(3): 219–344.
89.
SwannJPopeRCarterR (2011) Creativity in Language and Literature: The State of the Art. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
90.
TayD (2011) therapy is a journey as a discourse metaphor. Discourse Studies13(1): 47–68.
91.
ThomasB (2011) Trickster authors and tricky readers on the MZD forums. In: BrayJGibbonsA (eds) Mark Z. Danielewski. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 86–104.
92.
ThomasJ (1995) Meaning in Interaction. London: Longman.
93.
ThomsGVersaceS (2011) How does the mind do literary work? In: CalliesMKellerWRLohöferA (eds) Bi-Directionality in the Cognitive Sciences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 235–248.
94.
ToolanM (2011a) ‘I don’t know what they’re saying half the time but I’m hooked on the series’: Incomprehensible dialogue and integrated multimodal characterisation in The Wire. In: PiazzaRBednarekMRossiF (eds) Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 161–184.
95.
ToolanM (2011b) Teaching the stylistics of prose fiction. In: JeffriesLMcIntyreD (eds) Teaching Stylistics. Basingstoke: English Subject Centre/Palgrave, pp. 178–199.
96.
Van LeeuwenT (2011) The Language of Colour: An Introduction. Abingdon: Routledge.
97.
Van PeerW (1989) Quantitative studies of style: A critique and an outlook. Computers and the Humanities23: 301–307.
98.
Van PeerWZyngierSChesnokovaA (2011) Learning without teaching: Literature and the REDES project. In: JeffriesLMcIntyreD (eds) Teaching Stylistics. Basingstoke: English Subject Centre/Palgrave, pp. 109–126.
99.
WalesK (2011) A Dictionary of Stylistics (3rd edn). London: Pearson.
100.
WandorM (2011) Hybridity in the mind and on the page: Genre, words, music and narrative. In: SwannJPopeRCarterR (eds) Creativity in Language and Literature: The State of the Art. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 172–180.
101.
WestD (2011) Teaching cognitive stylistics. In: JeffriesLMcIntyreD (eds) Teaching Stylistics. Basingstoke: English Subject Centre/Palgrave, pp. 239–254.
102.
WhiteleyS (2011a) Text world theory, real readers and emotional responses to The Remains of the Day. Language and Literature20(1): 23–41.
103.
WhiteleyS (2011b) Talking about ‘An Accommodation’: The implications of discussion group data for community engagement and pedagogy. Language and Literature20(3): 236–256.
104.
YellandC (2011) A genre and move analysis of written feedback in higher education. Language and Literature20(3): 218–235.