Drawing on examples from a corpus of 14 excerpts from novels, this article aims to present a systematic investigation of the different linguistic forms, conceptual structures and communicative functions of personification in discourse. The Metaphor Identification Procedure (Pragglejaz Group, 2007) and Steen’s five-step procedure (1999, 2009) will be used to present an integral model distinguishing between linguistic, conceptual, and communicative levels of analysis. The influence of linguistic realization, conventionality, deliberateness, metonymy, and stylistic effects will be considered and it will be demonstrated that studying personifications in discourse raises different issues at each level of analysis. As a result, the question whether something should count as a personification may yield a different answer for each level.
Aisenman RA ( 1999) Structure-mapping and the simile-metaphor preference, Metaphor and Symbol14(1): 45-51.
2.
Black E. ( 1993) Metaphor, simile and cognition in golding’s the inheritors, Language and Literature2(1): 37-48.
3.
Bovair S. and Kieras D. ( 1985) A guide to propositional analysis for research on technical prose, in Britton B and Black J (eds) Understanding Expository Text. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum , 315-362.
4.
Bowdle BF and Gentner D. ( 2005) The career of metaphor, Psychological Review112(1): 193-216.
5.
Cameron L. ( 2003) Metaphor in Educational Discourse. London and New York: Continuum .
6.
Cameron L. and Low G. ( 2004) Figurative variation in episodes of educational talk and text, European Journal of English Studies8(3): 355-373.
7.
Crisp P. ( 2005) Allegory, blending and possible situations, Metaphor and Symbol20(2): 115-31.
8.
Crisp P. ( 2008) Between extended metaphor and allegory: Is blending enough ? Language and Literature17(4): 291-308.
9.
Dorst AG, Mulder G. and Steen GJ (submitted) Recognition of personifications in fiction by non-expert readers, Metaphor and the Social World.
10.
Edgecombe RS ( 1997) Ways of personifying, Style31(1): 1-13.
11.
Geeraerts D. ( 2002) The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions, in Dirven R and Pörings R (eds) Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 435-465.
12.
Gentner D. and Bowdle BF ( 2001) Convention, form, and figurative language processing, Metaphor and Symbol16(3-4): 223-247.
13.
Goossens L. ( 2002) Metaphtonomy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action, in Dirven R and Pörings R (eds) Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter , 349-377.
14.
Graesser AC, Mio J. and Millis KK ( 1989) Metaphors in persuasive communication, in Meutsch D and Viehoff R (eds) Comprehension of Literary Discourse: Results and Problems of Interdisciplinary Approaches. Berlin and New York : Mouton de Gruyter, 131-153.
15.
Hamilton CA ( 2002) Mapping the mind and the body: On W.H. Auden’s personifications, Style36(3): 408-427.
16.
Heywood J., Semino E. and Short M. ( 2002) Linguistic metaphor identification in two extracts from novels, Language and Literature11(1): 35-54.
17.
Kintsch W. ( 1998) Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Kövecses Z. ( 2002) Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
Lakoff G. and Johnson M. ( 1980) Metaphors we Live by. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Lakoff G. and Turner M. ( 1989) More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor . Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Langacker RW ( 2009) Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
22.
Leech G. and Short M. ( 2007) Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose (2nd edn). Harlow : Pearson Education.
23.
Low G. ( 1999) "This paper thinks ...": Investigating the acceptibility of the metaphor AN ESSAY IS A PERSON, in Cameron L and Low G (eds) Researching and Applying Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 221-248.
24.
MacKay DG ( 1986) Prototypicality among metaphors: On the relative frequency of personification and spatial metaphors in literature written for children versus adults, Metaphor and Symbolic Activity1(2): 87-107.
25.
Paxton JJ ( 1994) The Poetics of Personification. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
26.
Pragglejaz Group (2007) A practical and flexible method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse , Metaphor and Symbol23(1): 1-39.
27.
Radden G. ( 2002) How metonymic are metaphors?, in Dirven R and Pörings R (eds) Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter , 407-434.
28.
Rundell M and Fox G (eds) (2002) Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners . Oxford: Macmillan Education.
29.
Steen GJ ( 1999) From linguistic to conceptual metaphor in five steps, in Gibbs RW, Jr. and Steen GJ (eds) Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 57-77.
30.
Steen GJ ( 2007) Finding Metaphor in Grammar and Usage: A Methodological Analysis of Theory and Research. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
31.
Steen GJ ( 2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor, Metaphor and Symbol23(4): 213-241.
32.
Steen GJ ( 2009) From linguistic form to conceptual structure in five steps: Analyzing metaphor in poetry, in Brône G and Vandaele J (eds) Cognitive poetics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 197-226.
33.
Steen GJ, Dorst AG, Herrmann JB, Kaal AA, Krennmayr T. and Pasma T. ( 2010) A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
34.
Wales K. ( 1996) Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Wales K. ( 2001) A Dictionary of Stylistics (2nd edn). London: Longman.
