This article considers the role of accounts of inferential processes in the stylistic analysis of texts. It approaches this question by considering the range of contributions an account of inferential processes might make to the stylistic analysis of William Golding's 1955 novel The Inheritors. It considers what such an account might add to insights already provided by previous analyses, including Halliday's famous analysis ('Linguistic Function and Literary Style', 1971) and Hoover's more recent corpus-based work (Language and Style in 'The Inheritors', 1999), both of which say relatively little about inferential processes. This article suggests that an account of inferential processes is in principle a vital part of any adequate account of how texts create effects, even though it is not always practical to offer a detailed account. In some cases, including the case of The Inheritors, the nature of the inferential processes which the text gives rise to makes an important contribution to how we understand and respond to the text.
Adriaens, M. (1970) `Style in W. Golding's The Inheritors', English Studies51(1): 16-30.
2.
Barthes, R. (1977) Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana .
3.
Bex, T., Burke, M. and Stockwell, P. (eds) ( 2000) Contextualized Stylistics In Honour of Peter Verdonk. Amsterdam: Rodopi .
4.
Biles, J. (1970) Talk: Conversations with William Golding. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
5.
Black, E. (1993) `Metaphor, Simile and Cognition in William Golding's The Inheritors', Language and Literature2(1): 37-48.
6.
Black, E. (2006) Pragmatic Stylistics. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press.
7.
Blakemore, D. (2002) Relevance and Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Bott, L. and Noveck, I.A. (2004) `Some Utterances are Underinformative: The Onset and Time Course of Scalar Inferences', Journal of Memory and Language51(3): 437-57.
9.
Bransford, J.D. and Johnson, M.K. (1972) `Contextual Prerequisites for Understanding: Some Investigations of Comprehension and Recall', Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour11(6): 717-26.
10.
Burton-Roberts, N. (ed) (2007) Pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave .
11.
Carston, R. (2002) Thoughts and Utterances. Oxford : Basil Blackwell.
12.
Carter, R. and Stockwell, P. (eds) (2008) The Language and Literature Reader. London: Routledge.
13.
Carver, R. (1983) `Cathedral', in R. Carver Cathedral: Stories, pp. 209-28. New York: Knopf.
14.
Clark, A.ndrew (2006) `Disgraced boss Ken Lay dies at luxury ski chalet' , Guardian, 6 July. URL (accessed March 2009): http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2006/jul/06/usnews.enron
15.
Clark, B. (1996) `Stylistics and Relevance Theory', Language and Literature5(3): 163-78.
16.
Culpeper, J. (2001) Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts. Harlow: Pearson .
17.
Culpeper, J., Short, M. and P. Verdonk (eds) ( 1998) Exploring the Language of Drama: From Text to Context . London: Routledge.
18.
Dancygier, B. (2005) `Blending and Narrative Viewpoint: Jonathan Raban's Travels Through Mental Spaces', Language and Literature14(2): 99-127.
19.
Ellis, J.M. (1989) Against Deconstruction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Fauconnier, G. (1997) Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (2002) The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
22.
Fish, S. (1973) `What is Stylistics and Why Are They Saying Such Terrible Things About It?' in S. Chatman (ed) Approaches to Poetics, pp. 109-52. New York: Columbia University Press. Reprinted in S. Fish Is There A Text In This Class? The Authority of Interpretative Communities, pp. 68-96. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Also in J. Weber (ed.) (1996) The Stylistics Reader, pp. 94-116. London: Edward Arnold.
23.
Fowler, R. (1977) Linguistics and the Novel. London: Methuen.
24.
Fowler, R. (1981) Literature as Social Discourse. London: Batsford.
25.
Fowler, R. (1986) Linguistic Criticism. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
26.
Furlong, A. (1996) `Relevance Theory and Literary Interpretation', PhD Thesis, University College London.
27.
Golding, W. (1955) The Inheritors. London: Faber & Faber.
28.
Grice, H.P. (1975) `Logic and Conversation', in P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds) Syntax and Semantics vol.3, pp. 41-58. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in H.P. Grice (1989) Studies in the Way of Words, pp. 22-40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Grice, H.P. (1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Halliday, M. (1971) `Linguistic Function and Literary Style: An Enquiry into the Language of William Golding's The Inheritors', in S. Chatman (ed.) Literary Style: A Symposium , pp. 330-68. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprinted in J. Weber (ed.) (1996) The Stylistics Reader, pp. 56-86. London: Edward Arnold.
31.
Hoover, D.L. (1999) Language and Style in `The Inheritors'. Lanham, MD and Oxford: University Press of America.
32.
Kinkead-Weekes, M. and Gregor, I. (1964) `Introduction', in M. Kinkead-Weekes and I. GregorThe Inheritors: An Educational Edition, pp. 11-18. London: Faber & Faber.
33.
Kinkead-Weekes, M. and Gregor, I. (2002) William Golding: A Critical Study of the Novels (3rd edition). London: Faber & Faber.
34.
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Hodder Arnold .
35.
Lakoff, G. (1996) `"Sorry, I'm Not Myself Today": The Metaphor System for Conceptualising the Self', in G. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser (eds) Spaces, Worlds and Grammars, pp. 91-123. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Lee, D. (1976) `The Inheritors' and Transformational Generative Grammar', Language and Style9(22): 77-97.
37.
Leech, G. and Short, M. (1981) Style in Fiction. London: Longman.
38.
Levinson, S. (2000) Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalised Conversational Implicature. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
39.
MacMahon, B. (2006) `Stylistics: Pragmatic Approaches', in K. Brown (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, volume12, pp. 232-6. Oxford: Elsevier.
40.
McLean, B. and Elkind, P. (2003) The Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Scandalous Fall of Enron. London: Penguin.
41.
Milic, L. (1985) `Contra Fish: The Arrogance of Misreading', Style19(3): 385-91.
42.
Noveck, I.A. (2001) `When Children are More Logical than Adults: Experimental Investigations of Scalar Implicature', Cognition78(2): 165-88.
43.
Pilkington, A. (2000) Poetic Effects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
44.
Pratt, M. (1977) Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse . Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
45.
Recanati, F. (2004) Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Sell, R. (ed.) (1991) Literary Pragmatics. London: Routledge.
47.
Semino, E. (2007) `Mind Style Twenty-Five Years On', Style41(2): 153-73.
48.
Simpson, P. (1993) Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge.
49.
Simpson, P. (2003) On the Discourse of Satire: Towards a Stylistic Model of Satirical Humour. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
50.
Simpson, P. (2004) Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.
51.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
52.
Toolan, M. (1990) The Stylistics of Fiction: A Literary-Linguistic Approach. London: Routledge.
53.
Toolan, M. (ed.) (1992) Language, Text and Context: Essays in Stylistics. London: Routledge.
54.
Toolan, M. (1996) Total Speech: An Integrational Linguistic Approach to Language. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
55.
Toolan, M. (1998) Language in Literature: An Introduction to Stylistics. London: Edward Arnold. van Leeuwen, T. (2005) Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
56.
van Peer, W. and Renkema, J. (eds) (1984) Pragmatics and Stylistics. Leuven/Amersfoort: Acco.
57.
Weaver, Matt (2006) `Disgraced Enron Chairman Dead', Guardian 6 July. URL (accessed March 2009): http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2006/jul/06/wrap.matthewweaver
58.
Wells, H.G. (1919) The Outline of History. London : George Newnes.
59.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (2002) `Truthfulness and Relevance', Mind111(443): 583-632.
60.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (2004) `Relevance Theory', in G. Ward and L. Horn (eds) The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 607-32. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
61.
Zegarac, V. and Clark, B. (1999) `Phatic Interpretations and Phatic Communication' , Journal of Linguistics35(2): 321-46.
