The present study investigates the effects of foregrounding on the process of defamiliarization of students of literature and engineering, and on the way they develop refamiliarization, that is, the reconstructive process they undergo in order to return to familiar ground. It describes which refamiliarizing strategies these readers make use of and the role of feeling in this process. Data analysis is both quantitative and qualitative. The introspective method of the pause protocol is used in the qualitative part. Here, participants respond to the reading of a short story. The purpose is to investigate how they react to its content and which of its segments trigger comments. Results demonstrate that appreciating the formal elements of a text might be an effective strategy, as readers do not try to decode the text any longer and start reflecting on it, thus building an interpretation. They also develop a new perspective on the world around them and on themselves.
Carvalho, M. (2001) `Ler por Prazer / Ler por Estudo; uma Dicotomia Viável?' (Reading for pleasure/reading for study: A real dichotomy?), in S. Zyngier, P. Pinheiro and R. Figueiredo (eds) Conhecimento e Imaginação — Coletânea dos trabalhos do I ECEL — Encontro de Ciência Empírica da Literatura, pp. 150—66. Rio de Janeiro: Serviço de Publicações da Faculdade de Letras da UFRJ.
2.
Cavalcanti, M. (1987) `Investigating FL Reading Performance Through Pause Protocols', in C. Faerch and G. Kasper (eds) Introspection in Second Language Research, pp. 230—50. Clevedon, Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.
3.
Cook, G. (1994) Discourse and Literature. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
4.
Coutinho, F. (2001) `Bases Empíricas para o Processo de Conscientização e a Construção do Ficcional no Estudo Literário' (Empirical bases for the process of awareness and the construction of the fictional in literary study) , in S. Zyngier, P. Pinheiro and R. Figueiredo (eds) Conhecimento e Imaginação — Coletânea dos trabalhos do I ECEL — Encontro de Ciência Empírica da Literatura, pp. 77—84. Rio de Janeiro: Serviço de Publicações da Faculdade de Letras da UFRJ.
5.
Fialho, Olívia da Costa (2005) `Pelos Caminhos da Leitura: Estudo Empírico sobre Refamiliarização e Afeto' (Through the Paths of Reading: An empirical study on re-familiarization and affect), MA thesis, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro.
6.
Fialho, O. and Zyngier, S. (2003) `Reading Preferences: A Comparative Study', in S. Zyngier, P. Pinheiro and R. Figueiredo (eds) Pontes & Transgressões: Estudos Empíricos de Processos Culturais , pp. 56—66. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
7.
Frijda, N.H. (1986) The Emotions — Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Hakemulder, J. (2004) `Foregrounding and its Effects on Readers' Perception ', Discourse Processes38(2): 193—218.
9.
Harker, W.J. (1994) `Plain Sense' and `Poetic Significance': Tenth-grade Readers Reading Two Poems', Poetics22: 199—218.
10.
Harker, W.J. (1996) `Toward a Defensible Psychology of Literary Interpretation ', in R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (eds) Empirical Approaches to Literature and Aesthetics, pp. 645—58. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11.
Lispector, C. (1998[1971]) `O Primeiro Beijo' (The first kiss), in C. Lispector, Felicidade Clandestina. Rio de Janeiro: Rocco.
12.
Mendes, M. and Zyngier, S. (2003) `Appraising the Literary Experience: A Change in Methodology', paper presented at the 23rd PALA (Poetics and Linguistics Association) Conference, Bogaziçi University, Instanbul.
13.
Miall, D.S. (1996) `Empowering the Reader: Literary Response and Classroom Learning', in R. J. Kreuz and S. M. MacNealy (eds) Empirical Approaches to Literature and Aesthetics, pp. 463—78. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14.
Miall, D.S. and Kuiken, D. (1994) `Foregrounding, Defamiliarization and Affect: Response to Literary Stories', Poetics22: 389—407.
15.
Miall, D.S. and Kuiken, D. (2001) `Shifting Perspectives: Readers' Feelings and Literary Response', in W. van Peer and S. Chatman (eds) New Perspectives on Narrative Perspective, pp. 289—301. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
16.
Miall, D.S. and Kuiken, D. (2002) `A Feeling for Fiction: Becoming What We Behold ', Poetics30: 221—41.
17.
Rosa, G. (1972) `Substância' (Substance), in G. Rosa, Primeiras Estórias (6th edition). Rio de Janeiro: Editora José Olympio.
18.
Schmidt, S. (1983) `Interpretation: Sacred Cow or Necessity?', Poetics12: 239—58.
19.
van Peer, W. (1986) Stylistics and Psychology — Investigations of Foregrounding. London, Sydney , Wolfeboro, NH.: Croom Helm .
20.
Zyngier. S. (2004) `Vingança: Amanhã Serei o Professor ou a Violência Invisível no Ensino de Literatura em Língua Estrangeira' (Revenge: Tomorrow I will be the teacher or invisible violence in the teaching of literature in a foreign language), paper presented at the ANPOLL Conference. São Paulo.
21.
Zyngier, S. and Shepherd, T. (2003) `What is Literature, Really? A Corpus-Driven Study of Students' Statements', Style37(1): 15—26.
