Alter, R.
(2000) Canon and Creativity: Modern Writing and the Authority
of Scripture.
New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press
.
2.
Alter, R.
(2005) Imagined Cities: Urban Experience and the Language of
the Novel.
New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press
.
3.
Attridge, D.
(2005)
‘A Response to Rob Pope’
, Language and Literature14(4):
390-392
.
4.
Beall, E. P.
(2005)
‘“As Reading As If”: Harryette
Mullen’s “Cognitive Similes”’
, Journal of Literary Semantics34(2):
125-137
.
5.
Boardman, M.
(2005) The Language of Websites.
London: Routledge
.
6.
Brandt, L.
and
Brandt, P. A.
(2005)
‘Cognitive Poetics and Imagery’
, European Journal of English Studies9(2):
117-130
.
7.
Bridgeman, T.
(2005)
‘Thinking Ahead: A Cognitive Approach to Prolepsis’
, Narrative13(2):
125-159
.
8.
Burke, M.
(2005)
‘How Cognition can Augment Stylistic Analysis’
, European Journal of English Studies9(2):
185-195
.
9.
Campbell, J.
(2005)
‘Fielding’s Style’
, English Literary History72(2):
407-428
.
10.
Carter, R.
(1982) Language and Literature: An Introductory Reader in
Stylistics.
London: Allen and Unwin
.
11.
Carter, R.
(2005)
‘Values and Pluralities: An Anecdotal Response to Rob Pope’
, Language and Literature14(4):
393-396
.
12.
Chapman, S.
and
Routledge, C.
(eds) (2005) Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy
of Language.
Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
.
13.
Cockcroft, R.
(2005)
‘Who Talks Whose Language? George Herbert and the
Reader’s World’
, Language and Literature14(3):
245-258
.
14.
Cockcroft, R.
and
Cockcroft, S.
(2005) Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric,
2nd edn.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
.
15.
Cohen, B.
and
Kujundžič, D.
(eds) (2005) Provocations to Reading: J. Hillis Miller and
the Democracy to Come.
New York: Fordham University Press
.
16.
Cox, A.
(2005) Writing Short Stories.
London: Routledge
.
17.
Crisp, P.
(2005)
‘Allegory and Symbol - A Fundamental Opposition?’
, Language and Literature14 (4):
323-338
.
18.
Cupchik, G. C.
and
Phillips, K.
(2005)
‘The Scent of Literature’
, Cognition and Emotion19(1):
101-119
.
19.
Dancygier, B.
(2005)
‘Blending and Narrative Viewpoint: Jonathan Raban’s
Travels Through Mental Spaces’
, Language and Literature14(2):
99-127
.
20.
Dawson, P.
(2005) Creative Writing and the New Humanities.
London: Routledge
.
21.
Deignan, A.
(2005) Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins
.
22.
Ekelund, B. G.
and
Börjesson, M.
(2005)
‘Comparing Literary Worlds: An Analysis of the Spaces of
Fictional Universes in the Work of Two US Prose Fiction Debut Cohorts, 1940
and 1955’
, Poetics33(5-6):
343-368
.
23.
Fahnestock, J.
(2005)
‘Rhetorical Stylistics’
, Language and Literature14(3):
215-230
.
24.
Fludernik, M.
(2005)
‘The Metaphorics and Metonymics of Carcerality: Reflections on
Imprisonment as Source and Target Domain in Literary Texts’
, English Studies86(3):
226-244
.
25.
Freeman, M. H.
(2005a)
‘The Poem as Complex Blend: Conceptual Mappings of Metaphor in
Sylvia Plath’s “The Applicant”’
, Language and Literature14 (1):
25-44
.
26.
Freeman, M. H.
(2005b) ‘Poetry as Power: The Dynamics of
Cognitive Poetics as a Scientific and Literary Paradigm’, in
H. Veivo
,
B. Pettersson
and
M. Polvinen
(eds) Cognition and Literary Interpretation in Practice, pp.
31-51.
Helsinki: Helsinki University Press
.
27.
Gavins, J.
(2005a)
‘(Re)thinking Modality: A Text-World Perspective’
, Journal of Literary Semantics34(2):
79-93
28.
Gavins, J.
(2005b) ‘Text World Theory in Literary
Practice’, in
H. Veivo
,
B. Pettersson
and
M. Polvinen
(eds) Cognition and Literary Interpretation in Practice, pp.
89-104.
Helsinki: Helsinki University Press
.
29.
Goatly, A.
(2005)
‘An Analysis of Elizabeth Jennings’s “One
Flesh”: Poem as Product and Process’
, Journal of Literary Semantics34(2):
139-163
.
30.
Grainger, T.
,
Goouch, K.
and
Lambirth, A.
(2005) Creativity and Writing: Developing Voice and Verve in
the Classroom.
London: Routledge
.
31.
Hall, G.
(2005) Literature in Language Education.
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
.
32.
Hamilton, C.
(2005)
‘A Cognitive Rhetoric of Poetry and Emily Dickinson’
, Language and Literature14(3):
279-294
.
33.
Hardy, D. E
(2005)
‘Towards a Stylistic Typology of Narrative Gaps: Knowledge
Gapping in Flannery O’Connor’s Fiction’
, Language and Literature14(4):
363-375
.
34.
Heffer, C.
(2005) The Language of Jury Trial: A Corpus-Aided Analysis of
Legal-Lay Discourse.
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
.
35.
Herman, D.Jahn, M.
and
Ryan, M. L.
(eds) (2005) The Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative
Theory.
London: Routledge
.
36.
Hidalgo Downing, L.
(2005)
‘Reading R. Coover’s “Quenby and Ola, Swede
and Carl”: An Empirical Study on Reference and Story Interpretation’
, European Journal of English Studies9(2):
155-168
.
37.
Hume, K.
(2005)
‘Narrative Speed in Contemporary Fiction’
, Narrative13(2):
103-124
.
38.
Hunter, L.
(2005)
‘Echolocation, Figuration and Tellings: Rhetorical Strategies in
Romeo and Juliet’
, Language and Literature14(3):
259-278
.
39.
Johansen, J. D.
(2005) ‘Theory and/vs. Interpretation in
Literary Studies’, in
H. Veivo
,
B. Pettersson
and
M. Polvinen
(eds) Cognition and Literary Interpretation in Practice, pp.
241-266.
Helsinki: Helsinki University Press
.
40.
Keeble, D.
(2005)
‘Interpretive Representation: A Relevance-theoretic Analysis of
the Opening Paragraph of Carlyle’s Chartism’
, Journal of Literary Semantics34(1):
41-60
.
41.
McCafferty, K.
(2005)
‘William Carleton between Irish and English: Using Literary
Dialect to Study Language Contact and Change’
, Language and Literature14(4):
339-362
.
42.
McIntyre, D.
(2005)
‘Logic, Reality and Mind Style in Alan Bennett’s The
Lady in the Van’
, Journal of Literary Semantics34(1):
21-40
.
43.
Martin, J.
and
White, P.
(2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in
English.
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
.
44.
Miall, D. S.
(2005) ‘Beyond Interpretation: The Cognitive
Significance of Reading’, in
H. Veivo
,
B. Pettersson
and
M. Polvinen
(eds) Cognition and Literary Interpretation in Practice,
pp.129-156.
Helsinki: Helsinki University Press
.
45.
Miller, J. Hillis
(2005) Literature as Conduct: Speech Acts in Henry
James.
New York: Fordham University Press
.
46.
Murphy, T.
(2005)
‘Interpreting Marked Order Narration: The Case of James
Joyce’s Eveline’
, Journal of Literary Semantics34(2):
107-124
.
47.
Norris, S.
and
Jones, R.
(eds) (2005) Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated
Discourse Analysis.
London: Routledge
.
48.
Pope, R.
(2005a)
‘The Return of Creativity: Common, Singular, and Otherwise’
, Language and Literature14(4):
376-389
.
49.
Pope, R.
(2005b) Creativity: Theory, History, Practice.
London: Routledge
.
50.
Reeves, C.
(2005) The Language of Science.
London: Routledge
.
51.
Robson, M.
and
Stockwell, P.
(2005) Language in Theory: A Resource Book for
Students.
London: Routledge
.
52.
Rubik, M.
(2005a)
‘Provocative and Unforgettable: Peter Carey’s Short
Fiction - A Cognitive Approach’
, European Journal of English Studies9(2):
169-184
.
53.
Rubik, M.
(2005b) ‘Navigating through Fantasy Worlds:
Cognition and the Intricacies of Reading Jasper Fforde’s The Eyre
Affair’, in
H. Veivo
,
B. Pettersson
and
M. Polvinen
(eds) Cognition and Literary Interpretation in Practice,
pp.183-200.
Helsinki: Helsinki University Press
.
54.
Schneider, R.
(2005)
‘Hypertext Narrative and the Reader: A View from Cognitive Theory’
, European Journal of English Studies9(2):
197-208
.
55.
Selden, R.
,
Widdowson, P.
and
Brooker, P.
(2005) A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary
Theory, 5th edn.Harlow: Longman
.
56.
Shen, D.
(2005)
‘How Stylisticians Draw on Narratology: Approaches, Advantages
and Disadvantages’
, Style39(4):
381-395
.
57.
Steen, G.
(2005)
‘Metonymy Goes Cognitive-linguistic’
, Style39(1):
1-11
.
58.
Stockwell, P.
(2005a)
‘Texture and Identification’
, European Journal of English Studies9(2):
143-153
.
59.
Stockwell, P.
(2005b) ‘On Cognitive Poetics and
Stylistics’, in
H. Veivo
,
B. Pettersson
and
M. Polvinen
(eds) Cognition and Literary Interpretation in Practice, pp.
267-282.
Helsinki: Helsinki University Press
.
60.
Strack, D. C.
(2005)
‘Who are the Bridge-builders? Metaphor, Metonymy, and the
Architecture of Empire’
, Style39(1):
37-54
.
61.
Stubbs, M.
(2005)
‘Conrad in the Computer: Examples of Quantitative Stylistic Methods’
, Language and Literature14(1):
5-24
.
62.
Toolan, M.
and
Weber, J. J.
(2005)
‘Introduction to the Special Issue: The Cognitive Turn: Papers in
Cognitive Literary Studies’
, European Journal of English Studies9(2):
107-115
.
63.
Vandevelde, P.
(2005) The Task of the Interpreter: Text, Meaning, and
Negotiation.
Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press
.
64.
Veivo, H.
,
Pettersson, B.
and
Polvinen, M.
(eds) (2005) Cognition and Literary Interpretation in
Practice.
Helsinki: Helsinki University Press
.
65.
Verdonk, P.
(2005)
‘Painting, Poetry, Parallelism: Ekphrasis, Stylistics and
Cognitive Poetics’
, Language and Literature14(3):
231-244
.
66.
Vorobyova, O.
(2005) ‘“The Mark on the
Wall” and Literary Fancy: A Cognitive Sketch’, in
H. Veivo
,
B. Pettersson
and
M. Polvinen
(eds) Cognition and Literary Interpretation in Practice, pp.
201-217.
Helsinki
.
67.
Weber, J. J.
(2005a)
‘From “Bad” to “Worse”:
Pragmatic Scales and the (De)construction of Cultural Models’
, Language and Literature14(1):
45-63
.
68.
Weber, J. J.
(2005b)
‘Cognitive Poetics and Literary Criticism: Types of Resolution in
the Condition-of-England Novel’
, European Journal of English Studies9(2):
131-141
.
69.
Wright, E.
(2005) Narrative, Perception, Language and Faith.
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
.
70.
Wynne, M.
(ed.) (2005) Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good
Practice.
Oxford: Oxbow Books
.
