Implementing and evaluating a self-assessment mechanism for the web-based Language and Style course

Abstract

This article reports on the project to design and implement a web-based mechanism for formative self-assessment, to be used as part of Mick Short's online stylistics course, Language and Style (see the preface to this issue for details). Using the self-assessment mechanism, students can compare their own performance on extended academic tasks (the stylistic analysis of three literary texts – a poem, a piece of prose fiction and a drama extract) with benchmarked sample answers. In this article we describe the process of developing benchmarks for the self-assessment mechanism and explain how this mechanism works in practice. Finally, we discuss students’ reactions to the self-assessment instruments, as part of our own assessment of their validity and pedagogical value.

Keywords

assessment benchmarking computer-assisted learning e-learning evaluation self-assessment stylistics pedagogy web-based learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alderson, J. C. (2005) Diagnosing Foreign Language Proficiency: The Interface between Learning and Assessment. London: Continuum .

Boud, D. (1981) ‘Toward Student Responsibility for Learning’, in D. Boud (ed.) Developing Student Autonomy in Learning, pp. 21–37. London: Kogan Page .

Boud, D. (1991) Implementing Student Self-Assessment, 2nd edn. Sydney: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia .

Cowman, K. and Grace, S. (1999) ‘Key Aspects of Teaching and Learning in Arts and Humanities’, in H. Fry , S. Ketteridge and S. Marshall (eds) A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, pp. 289–308. London: Kogan Page .

Gleaves, H. (2005) ‘Towards an Understanding of E-learning: A Comparative Study of a Web-based MBA Project Management Module with its Traditional Face-to-face Taught Counterpart’, unpublished MA dissertation, Oxford Brookes University.

Jordan, S. (1999) ‘Self-assessment and Peer-assessment’, in S. Brown and A. Glasner (eds) Assessment Matters in Higher Education, pp. 172–182. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press .

Katz, Y. J. (2000) ‘The Comparative Suitability of Three ICT Distance Learning Methodologies for College Level Instruction’ , Educational Media International 37(1): 25–30 .

Laurillard, D. (1993) Rethinking University Teaching. London: Routledge .

McEnery, A. M. and Baker, P. (1998) ‘Integrating the Intranet into the Teaching of Linguistics’, in K. De Smedt and D. Apollon (eds) The Future of the Humanities in the Digital Age: Problems and Perspectives for Humanities Education and Research, pp. 138–140. Norway: University of Bergen .

10.

McEnery, A. M. , Baker, J. P. and Wilson, A. (1995) ‘A Brief Report on a Statistical Analysis of Corpus-based versus Traditional Human-teaching Methods of Part-of-speech Analysis’ , Computer Assisted Language Learning 8(2–3): 259–274 .

11.

Oliver, R. and Omar, A. (2001) ‘Student Responses to Collaborating and Learning in a Web-based Environment’ , Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17(1): 34–47 .

12.

Powell, J. P. (1981) ‘Moving Towards Independent Learning’, in D. Boud (ed.) Developing Student Autonomy in Learning, pp. 205–210. London: Kogan Page .

13.

Roever, C. (2001) ‘Web-based Language Testing’ , Language Learning & Technology 5(2): 84–94 .

14.

Short, M. and Archer, D. (2002) ‘Investigating the Effectiveness of WWW-based Stylistics Teaching’ , Council for College and University English News 16: 7–8 .

15.

Short, M. and Archer, D. (2003) ‘Designing a Worldwide-web-based Stylistics Course and Investigating its Effectiveness’ , Style 37(1): 27–46 .

16.

Stone Wiske, M. (1999) ‘What is Teaching for Understanding?’, in J. Leach and B. Moon (eds) Learners and Pedagogy, pp. 230–246. London: Open University Press/Paul Chapman Publishing .

17.

Toohey, S. (1999) Designing Courses for Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press .