Coulson, S.
(2001) Semantic Leaps: Frame-shifting and Conceptual Blending
in Meaning Construction.
New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
2.
Fauconnier, G.
(1994 [1985]) Mental Spaces, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
3.
Fauconnier, G.
(1997) Mappings in Thought and Language.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
4.
Fauconnier, G.
and
Sweetser, E.
(eds) (1996) Spaces, Worlds, and Grammars.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
5.
Fauconnier, G.
and
Turner, M.
(1996) ‘Blending as a Central Process of
Grammar’, in
A. Goldberg
(ed.) Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, pp.
113–130.
Stanford, CA. CSLI Publications
.
6.
Fauconnier, G.
and
Turner, M.
(1998a)
‘Conceptual Integration Networks’
, Cognitive Science22(2):
133–187
.
7.
Fauconnier, G.
and
Turner, M.
(1998b) ‘Principles of Conceptual
Integration’, in
J.P. Koenig
et al. (eds) Discourse and Cognition, pp.
269–283.
Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications
.
8.
Fauconnier, G.
and
Turner, M.
(2002) The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the
Mind's Hidden Complexities.
New York: Basic Books
.
9.
Turner, M.
and
Fauconnier, G.
(1995)
‘Conceptual Integration and Formal Expression’
, Metaphor and Symbolic Activity10(3):
183–203
.
10.
Turner, M.
and
Fauconnier, G.
(1999)
‘A Mechanism of Creativity’
, Poetics Today20(3):
397–418
.
11.
Bradshaw, G.
,
Bishop, T.
and
Turner, M.
(eds) (2004) The Shakespearean International Yearbook 4:
Shakespeare Studies Today.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
12.
Colm Hogan, P.
and
Pandit, L.
(eds) (2006) College Literature33(1), Special Issue ‘Cognitive Shakespeare’.
13.
Coulson, S.
and
Oakley, T.
(eds) (2000) Cognitive Linguistics11, Special Issue, ‘Conceptual Blending’.
14.
Coulson, S.
and
Oakley, T.
(eds) (2005) Journal of Pragmatics37(10), Special Issue on Conceptual Integration Theory.
15.
Richardson, A.
and
Steen, F. F.
(eds) (2002), Poetics Today23(1):
1–8
, Special issue, ‘Literature and the Cognitive Revolution’.
16.
Style(2002) 36(3), Special Issue
‘Cognitive Approaches to Figurative Language’.
17.
Fauconnier, G.
and
Turner, M.
(1999) ‘Metonymy and Conceptual
Integration’, in
K-U. Panther
and
G. Radden
(eds) Metonymy in Language and Thought, pp.
77–90.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins
.
18.
Fauconnier, G.
and
Turner, M.
(2003) ‘Polysemy and Conceptual
Blending’, in
B. Nerlich
,
V. Herman
,
Z. Todd
and
D. Clarke
(eds) Polysemy: Flexible Patterns of Meaning in Mind and Language,
pp. 79–94.
Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter and John Benjamins
.
19.
Grady, J.
,
Oakley, T.
and
Coulson, S.
(1999) ‘Conceptual Blending and
Metaphor’, in
G. Steen
and
R. Gibbs
(eds) Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, pp.
100–124.
Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins
.
20.
Bex, T.
,
Burke, M.
and
Stockwell, P.
(2000) Contextualized Stylistics: In Honour of Peter
Verdonk.
Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi
.
21.
Dancygier, B.
(2004a) ‘Identity and Perspective: the
Jekyll-and-Hyde Effect in Narrative Discourse’, in
M. Achard
and
S. Kemmer
(eds) Language, Culture, and Mind, pp.
363–376.
Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications
.
22.
Dancygier, B.
(2004b) ‘Visual Viewpoint, Narrative Viewpoint,
and Mental Spaces in Narrative Discourse’, in
A. Soares da Silva
,
A. Torres
, and
M. Gonçalves
(eds) Linguagem, Cultura e Cognicão: Estudos de Linguistica
Cognitiva, Vol. 1/2, pp. 347–362.
Coimbra: Livraria Almedina
.
23.
Dancygier, B.
(2005)
‘Blending and Narrative Viewpoint: Jonathan Raban's
Travels Through Mental Spaces’
, Language and Literature14(2):
99–127
.
24.
Freeman, D. C.
(1993)
‘“According to My Bond”: King Learand Re-Cognition’
, Language and Literature2:
1–18
.
25.
Freeman, D. C.
(1995)
‘“Catch`[ing] the Nearest Way”: Macbethand
Cognitive Metaphor’
, Journal of Pragmatics24:
698–708
.
26.
Freeman, D. C.
(1999)
‘“The Rack Dislimns”: Schema and Metaphorical
Pattern in Antony and Cleopatra’
, Poetics Today20:
443–460
.
27.
Freeman, D. C.
(2004) ‘Othello and the “Ocular
Proof”, in
G. Bradshaw
,
T. Bishop
and
M. Turner
(eds) The Shakespearean International Yearbook 4: Shakespeare Studies
Today, pp. 72–97.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
28.
Freeman, M.
(1997)
‘Grounded Spaces: Deictic Self-anaphors in the Poetry of Emily Dickinson’
, Language and Literature6:
7–28
.
29.
Freeman, M.
(2002)
‘Momentary Stays, Exploding Forces: A Cognitive Linguistic
Approach to the Poetics of Emily Dickinson and Robert Frost’
, Journal of English Linguistics30(1):
73–90
.
30.
Freeman, M.
(2005)
‘The poem as Complex Blend: Conceptual Mappings of Metaphor in
Sylvia Plath's “The Applicant”’
, Language and Literature14(1):
25–44
.
31.
Gavins, J.
and
Steen, G.
(eds) (2003) Cognitive Poetics in Practice.
London and New York: Routledge
.
32.
Hamilton, C.
(2002) ‘Conceptual Integration in Christine de
Pizan's “City of Ladies”’, in
E. Semino
and
J. Culpeper
(eds) Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text
Analysis, pp. 1–22.
Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins
.
33.
Hiraga, M.
(1999a)
‘Blending and an Interpretation of Haiku’
, Poetics Today20(3):
461–482
.
34.
Hiraga, M.
(1999b) ‘Rough Sea and the Milky Way:
“Blending” in a Haiku Text’, in
Ch. Nehaniv
(ed.) Computation for Metaphor, Analogy, and Agent,pp.
27–36.
Berlin: Springer-Verlag
.
35.
Hiraga, M. K.
(2005) Metaphor and Iconicity: A Cognitive Approach to
Analyzing Text.
Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan
.
36.
Oakley, T.
(1998)
‘Conceptual Blending, Narrative Discourse, and Rhetoric’
, Cognitive Linguistics9(4):
321–360
.
37.
Sanders, J.
and
Redeker, G.
(1996) ‘Perspective and the Representation of
Speech and Thought in Narrative Discourse’, in
G. Fauconnier
and
E. Sweetser
(eds) Spaces, Worlds and Grammar, pp.
290–317.
Chicag, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
38.
Semino, E.
(2002) ‘A Cognitive Stylistic Approach to Mind
Style in Narrative Fiction’, in
E. Semino
and
J. Culpeper
(eds), Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text
Analysis. pp. 95–122.
Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Bejamins
.
39.
Semino, E.
and
Culpeper, J.
(eds) (2002) Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in
Text Analysis.
Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins
.
40.
Sinding, M.
(2002)
‘Assembling Spaces: the Conceptual Structure of Allegory’
. Style36(3), Special Issue on Cognitive Approaches to Figurative
Language:
503–523
.
41.
Steen, F. F.
(1998)
‘“The Time of Unrememberable Being”:
Wordsworth's Autobiography of the Imagination’
, Auto/Biography Studies13(1), Special Issue on Autobiography and Neuroscience:
7–38
.
42.
Stockwell, P.
(2002) Cognitive Poetics: an Introduction.
London: Routledge
.
43.
Turner, M.
(1996) The Literary Mind: The Origins of Language and
Thought.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
44.
Turner, Mark
. (2003) ‘Double-scope
stories’, in
D. Herman
(ed.) Narrative Theory and the Cognitive Sciences, pp.
117–142.
Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications
.
45.
Wilson, Edward O.
(2002) The Future of Life.
New York: Alfred Knopf
.
46.
Hougaard, A.
and
Lund, S.
(eds) (2002) The Way We Think, vols I–III,
Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication 23.
47.
Liddell, S.
(1998)
‘Grounded Blends, Gestures, and Conceptual Shifts’
, Cognitive Linguistics9(3):
283–314
.
48.
Pascual, E.
(2002) Imaginary Trialogues: Conceptual Blending and Fictive
Interaction in Criminal Courts.
Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap
.
49.
Slingerland, E.
(2005)
Conceptual Blending, Somatic Marking, and Normativity: A Case Example from
Ancient Chinese’
, Cognitive Linguistics16(2):
557–584
.
50.
Turner, M.
(2001) Cognitive Dimensions of Social Science: The Way We
Think About Politics, Law, Economics, and Society.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
51.
Turner, M.
(2002)
‘The Cognitive Study of Art, Language, and Literature’
, Poetics Today23(1):
9–20
.
52.
Zbikowski, L.
(2001) Conceptualizing Music: Cognitive Structure, Theory,
and Analysis.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
