Bender, J.
and
Wellbery, D.
(1990) ‘Rhetoricality: On the Modernist Return
of Rhetoric,’ in
J. Bender
and
D. Wellbery
(eds) The Ends of Rhetoric: History, Theory, Practice, pp.
3-39.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
.
2.
Catano, J.
(1997) ‘Stylistics’, in
M. Groden
and
M. Kreiswirth
(eds) The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism, at
URL (accessed 28 October 2004): http://www.press.jhu.edu/books/hopkins_guide_to_literary_theory/stylistics.html
3.
Chomsky, N.
(2000) ‘Linguistics and Brain
Science’, in
A. MarantzY. Miyashita
and
W. O’Neil
(eds) Image, Language, Brain, pp. 13-28.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
, at URL (accessed 24 May 2001): http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/chapters/0262133717chap1.pdf
4.
Mailloux, S.
(2004) ‘Rhetorical Hermeneutics Still Again: Or,
On the Track of Phronesis’, in
W. Jost
and
W. Olmstead
(eds) A Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism, pp.
457-472.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
5.
Rotgé, W.
(in press)
‘Stylistics in France Today,’Style40(1).
6.
Sperber, D.
and
Wilson, D.
(1990) ‘Rhetoric and
Relevance,’ in
J. Bender
and
D. Wellbery
(eds) The Ends of Rhetoric: History, Theory, Practice, pp.
140-155.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
.
7.
Steiner, G.
(1976)
‘The “Linguistic-Poetic” Amalgam’
, New Universities Quarterly30(2):
250-253
.
8.
Turner, M.
(2002)
‘The Cognitive Study of Art, Language, and Literature’
, Poetics Today23(1):
9-20
.
