Negation in discourse: a text world approach to Joseph Heller’s Catch-22

Abstract

This article presents a discourse-based approach to negation by applying text world theory to the analysis of negation in the novel Catch-22, by Joseph Heller (1986 [1961]), The model developed for the analysis of negation is based on Werth’s (1999) notion of negation as a subworld which modifies information which is present in the common ground of the discourse. By so doing, negation contributes to the general discourse function of updating information in the text world. Additionally, negation may form part of contradictory structures which, being self-contained units, do not contribute to the updating discourse function but, rather, seem to block the flow of information. The analysis of the functions of negation is framed within a broader framework of stylistic analysis, where the objective is to discuss how the foregrounded nature of negation as a recursive feature in Catch-22 may have a defamiliarizing effect. The argument put forward in this article is that negation plays a crucial role in the expression of a conflict between what is presented as real and what is presented as not real in the fictional world; this conflict, in its turn, has important consequences for the way the story develops and the way major themes of the novel are treated.

Keywords

Catch-22 contradiction foregrounding Heller,Joseph negation text worlds

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allwood, J. , Andersson, L.G; and Östen, D. (1974) Logic in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Atlas, J.D. and Levinson, S. (1981) ‘It-clefts, Informativeness and Logical Form: Radical Pragmatics (revised version)’, in P. Cole (ed.) Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, pp. 32-37. New York: Academic Press.

Austin, J.K. (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Carston, R. (1996) ‘Metalinguistic Negation and Echoic Use’, Journal of Pragmatics 25: 309-330.

Clark, H.H. and Clark, E. (1977) Psychology and Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovic.

Downing, A. and Locke, P.L. (1992) A University Course in English Grammar. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice-Hall.

Dummett, M. (1981) Frege - Philosophy of Language. London: Trinity Press.

Escandell Vidal, M.V. (1990) ‘Estrategias en la Interpretación de Enunciados Contradictorios’, Actas del Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística, XX Aniversario, pp. 923-36. Madrid: Gredos.

Fauconnier, G. (1985) Mental Spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Fillmore, C. (1985) ‘Frames and the Semantics of Understanding’, Quaderni di Semantica 6(2): 222-254.

11.

Givón, T. (1979) On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.

12.

Givón, T. (1984) Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

13.

Givón, T. (1989) Mind, Code and Context: Essays in Pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

14.

Givón, T. (1993) English Grammar: A Function-Based Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

15.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.

16.

Heller, J. (1986 [1961]) Catch-22. London: Jonathan Cape.

17.

Hidalgo-Downing, L. (2000) Negation, Text Worlds and Discourse: The Pragmatics of Catch-22. Stamford, CT: Ablex.

18.

Horn, L. (1985) ‘Metalinguistic Negation and Pragmatic Ambiguity’, Language 6(1): 121-174.

19.

Horn, L. (1989) A Natural History of Negation. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

20.

Huddleston, R. (1984) An Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

21.

Iwata, S. (1998) ‘Some Extensions of the Echoic Analysis of Metalinguistics Negation’, Lingua 105: 49-65.

22.

Jespersen, O. (1966 [1917]) Negation in English and in Other Languages. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard.

23.

Jordan, M.P. (1998) ‘The Power of Negation in English: Text, Context, Relevance’, Journal of Pragmatics 29: 705-752.

24.

Kempson, R. (1975) Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

25.

Klima, E.S. (1964) ‘Negation in English’, in J.A. Fodor and J.J. Katz (eds) The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language, pp. 246-323. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice-Hall.

26.

Leech, G. (1974) Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

27.

Leinfeller, E. (1994) ‘The Broader Perspective of Negation’, Journal of Literary Semantics 13(2): 77-98.

28.

Marsh, R.C. (ed.) (1988) Bertrand Russell: Logic and Knowledge. London: Unwin Hyman.

29.

McCawley, J.D. (1981) Everything that Linguists Wanted to Know about Logic But were Afraid to Ask. Oxford: Blackwell.

30.

McHale, B. (1987) Postmodernist Fiction. London: Methuen.

31.

Pagano, A. (1994) ‘Negatives in Written Text’, in M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis, pp. 250-265. London: Routledge.

32.

Quirk, R. , Greenbaum, S. , Leech, G. and Svartvie, J. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

33.

Russell, B. (1988 [1905]) ‘On Denoting’, in R.C. Marsh (ed.) Bertrand Russell: Logic and Knowledge, pp. 39-57. London: Unwin Hyman.

34.

Ryan, M.L. (1991) Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence and Narrative Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

35.

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986) Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.

36.

Tottie, G. (1991) Negation in English speech and Writing: A Study in Variation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

37.

Wason, P.C. (1965) ‘The Contexts of Plausible Denial’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior 4: 9-11.

38.

Werth, P. (1995a) ‘How to Build a World (in a Lot Less than Six Days, Using Only What’s in Your Head’), in K. Green . (ed.) (1995) New Essays in Deixis, pp. 49-80. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

39.

Werth, P. (1995b) ‘ “World Enough, and Time”: Deictic Space and the Interpretation of Prose’, in P. Verdonk and J.J. Weber (eds) Twentieth Century Fiction: From Text to Context, pp. 181-205. London: Routledge.

40.

Werth, P. (1999) Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.