Older adults report higher levels of emotional well-being in cross-sectional studies. Despite assertions that older adults are better at regulating emotions, studies investigating emotion regulation (ER) strategies have not found consistent age differences. Instead, we propose a new framework on ER in aging focusing instead on ER tactics (how ER behavior is implemented in specific situations): the age-related Adaptive Positive Tactic (APT) shift hypothesis. Older adults report relatively greater use of positive-approaching tactics, consistent with this hypothesis. Positive-approaching tactics also appear more effective in regulating emotions than negative-receding tactics and thus may be more adaptive. We consider how context influences tactic use and discuss open questions about the hypothesis. With recent longitudinal evidence showing mixed patterns of emotional well-being in aging, the APT shift hypothesis can guide future investigation of within-person changes in ER behavior.
BueckerS.LuhmannM.HaehnerP.BühlerJ. L.DappL. C.LucianoE. C.OrthU. (2023). The development of subjective well-being across the life span: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 149(7–8), 418–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/BUL0000401
CharlesS. T.RushJ.PiazzaJ. R.CerinoE. S.MogleJ.AlmeidaD. M. (2023). Growing old and being old: Emotional well-being across adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(2), 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/PSPP0000453
5.
DienerE.SuhE. M.LucasR. E.SmithH. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
6.
DiGirolamoM. A.McCallE. C.UysalN. K.HoY. W.LindM.IsaacowitzD. M. (2023). Attention to emotional stimuli across adulthood and older age: A novel application of eye-tracking within the home. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(5), 1439–1453. https://doi.org/10.1037/XGE0001343
7.
DiGirolamoM. A.NeupertS. D.IsaacowitzD. M. (2023). Emotion regulation convoys: Individual and age differences in the hierarchical configuration of emotion regulation behaviors in everyday life. Affective Science, 4(4), 630–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-023-00228-8
8.
DiGirolamoM. A.UysalN. K.McCallE. C.IsaacowitzD. M. (2023). Attention-focused emotion regulation in everyday life in adulthood and old age. Emotion, 23(3), 633–650. https://doi.org/10.1037/EMO0001158
9.
EldesoukyL.EnglishT. (2019). Regulating for a reason: Emotion regulation goals are linked to spontaneous strategy use. Journal of Personality, 87(5), 948–961. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOPY.12447
10.
FordB. Q.FeinbergM.LassetterB.ThaiS.GatchpazianA. (2023). The political is personal: The costs of daily politics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000335
IsaacowitzD. M. (2012). Mood regulation in real time: Age differences in the role of looking. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(4), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412448651
14.
IsaacowitzD. M. (2022). What do we know about aging and emotion regulation?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(6), 1541–1555. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211059819
15.
IsaacowitzD. M.WolfeH. E. (2024). Emotion regulation tactics: A key to understanding age (and other between- and within-person) differences in emotion regulation preference and effectiveness. Emotion Review, 16(4), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739241259567
16.
LivingstoneK. M.IsaacowitzD. M. (2019). Age similarities and differences in spontaneous use of emotion regulation tactics across five laboratory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(11), 1972–1992. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000556
17.
LivingstoneK. M.IsaacowitzD. M. (2021). Age and emotion regulation in daily life: Frequency, strategies, tactics, and effectiveness. Emotion, 21(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000672
18.
MacCormackJ. K.BonarA. S.FeldmanM. J.LindquistK. A. (2023). Aging bodies, brains, and emotions: The physiological hypothesis of emotional aging. In KleckR. E.AdamsR. B.HessU. (Eds.), Emotion communication by the aging face and body: A multidisciplinary view (pp. 54–82). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009209656.004
MroczekD. K.KolarzC. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1333–1349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1333
RiedigerM.SchmiedekF.WagnerG. G.LindenbergerU. (2009). Seeking pleasure and seeking pain: Differences in prohedonic and contra-hedonic motivation from adolescence to old age. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1529–1535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02473.x
SchirdaB.ValentineT. R.AldaoA.PrakashR. S. (2016). Age-related differences in emotion regulation strategies: Examining the role of contextual factors. Developmental Psychology, 52(9), 1370–1380. https://doi.org/10.1037/DEV0000194
25.
SmithJ. L.HanniA. A. (2019). Effects of a savoring intervention on resilience and well-being of older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 38(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464817693375
26.
SpringsteinT.EnglishT. (2024). Distinguishing emotion regulation success in daily life from maladaptive regulation and dysregulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 28(2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683231199140
27.
UrryH. L.GrossJ. J. (2010). Emotion regulation in older age. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(6), 352–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410388395
28.
WhitmoyerP.FisherM. E.DuraneyE. J.ManzlerC.IsaacowitzD. M.AndridgeR.PrakashR. S. (2024). Age differences in emotion regulation strategy use and flexibility in daily life. Aging & Mental Health, 28(2), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2023.2256245
29.
WolfeH. E.IsaacowitzD. M. (2023). Aging and emotion regulation tactics across the historical events of 2020. The Gerontologist, 63(5), 933–944. https://doi.org/10.1093/GERONT/GNAC106
