We propose that much of modern human behavior can be understood as the outcome of a primitive and implicit desire for social embeddedness (i.e., a desire to belong to a larger, societal-level collective). Research from our lab suggests that people watch television, follow celebrities, and go to concerts and sporting events, at least in part, to fill this need. Connections to other research and implications for understanding human behavior are discussed.
AmitK.EpleyN. (2023). A little good goes an unexpectedly long way: Underestimating the positive impact of kindness on recipients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(1), 236–252. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/xge0001271
2.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental of human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
3.
BoothbyE. J.BohnsV. K. (2021). Why a simple act of kindness is not as simple as it seems: Underestimating the positive impact our compliments have on others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(5), 826–840.
4.
CaporaelL. R.BrewerM. B. (1995). Hierarchical evolutionary theory: There is an alternative, and it’s not creationism. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 31–34.
5.
DerrickJ. L.GabrielS.TippinB. (2008). Parasocial relationships and self-discrepancies: Faux relationships have benefits for low self-esteem individuals. Personal Relationships, 15(2), 261–280.
6.
DerrickJ. L.GabrielS.HugenbergK. J. (2009). Social surrogacy: How favored television programs provide the experience of belonging. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 352–362.
7.
EisenbergerN. I.LiebermanM. D.WilliamsK. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290–292.
8.
EpleyN.SchroederJ. (2014). Mistakenly seeking solitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 1980–1999. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037323
9.
FrijdaN. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43, 349–358.
10.
GabrielS.KawakamiK.BartakC.KangS.MannN. (2010). Negative self-synchronization: Will I change to be like you when it is bad for me?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 857–871.
11.
GabrielS.NaiduE.ParavatiE.MorrisonC. D.GaineyK. (2020). Creating the sacred from the profane: Collective effervescence and everyday activities. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(1), 129–154.
12.
GabrielS.ParavatiE. (2021). If music be the food of love, play on: Four ways that music may lead to social connection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 44, Article e71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001430
13.
GabrielS.ReadJ. P.YoungA. F.BachrachR. L.TroisiJ. (2017). Social surrogate use in those exposed to trauma: I get by with a little help from my (fictional) friends. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 36, 41–63.
14.
GabrielS.ValentiJ.Naragon-GaineyK.YoungA. F. (2017). The psychological importance of going to concerts, churches, and football games: Development and validation of the Tendency for Effervescent Assembly Measure (TEAM). Psychological Assessment, 29(11), 1349–1362.
15.
GabrielS.ValentiJ.YoungA. F. (2016). Social surrogates, social motivations, and everyday activities: The case for a strong, subtle, and sneaky social self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 189–243.
16.
GabrielS.YoungA. F. (2011). Becoming a vampire without being bitten: The narrative collective assimilation hypothesis. Psychological Science, 22, 990–994.
17.
GomillionS.GabrielS.KawakamiK.YoungA. F. (2017). Let’s stay home and watch TV: The benefits of shared media use for close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 346(6), 855–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516660388
18.
GonsalkoraleK.WilliamsK. D. (2007). The KKK won’t let me play: Ostracism even by a despised outgroup hurts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 1176–1186. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.392
19.
HirschJ. L.ClarkM. S. (2019). Multiple paths to belonging that we should study together. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 238–255. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1745691618803629
20.
HortonD.WohlR. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry, 19, 215–229.
21.
KanazawaS. (2002). Bowling with our imaginary friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 167–171.
22.
MaslowA. H. (1943). A theory of human motivationPsychological Review, 50(4), 430–437.
23.
MurrayS. L.GabrielS.SeeryM. D.LamarcheV. M.McNultyJ. K.NaiduE.WardD. E.XiaJ.ParavatiE. (2023). Sustaining real world connections: The (limited) power of social surrogates [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo.
24.
ParavatiE.NaiduE.GabrielS. (2021). From “love actually” to love, actually: The sociometer takes every kind of fuel. Self and Identity, 20, 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15298868.2020.1743750
25.
PhilpotR.LiebstL. S.LevineM.BernascoW.LindegaardM. R. (2020). Would I be helped? Cross-national CCTV footage shows that intervention is the norm in public conflicts. American Psychologist, 75(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000469
26.
ReevesB.NassC. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press.
27.
SandstromG. M.DunnE. W. (2013). Is efficiency overrated? Minimal social interactions lead to belonging and positive affect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(4), 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613 502990
28.
SchiappaE.GreggP. B.HewesD. E. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72, 92–115.
29.
SjåstadH.ZhangM.MasvieA. E.BaumeisterR. (2021). Social exclusion reduces happiness by creating expectations of future rejection. Self and Identity, 20(1), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2020.1779119
Van BeestI. V.WilliamsK. (2006). When inclusion costs and ostracism pays, ostracism still hurts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 918–928.
32.
WesselmannE. D.CardosoF. D.SlaterS.WilliamsK. (2012). To be looked at as though air. Psychological Science, 23, 166–168.
33.
WilliamsK. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452.
34.
WilsonE. O. (1978). On human nature. Harvard University Press.
35.
ZadroL.WilliamsK. D.RichardsonR. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 560–567.