Cognitive psychology has traditionally focused on investigating principles of cognition that are universal across the human species. The motivation to identify “cognitive universals” stems from the close relationship between biology and human cognition and from the theoretical architecture presupposed by the information-processing model. In this article, we argue that the underlying theoretical assumption of universality also stems from epistemological and methodological assumptions that laws of cognition can be effectively developed only by controlling for variables deemed to be outside the scope of internal cognition. These assumptions have resulted in the development of a science of human cognition based on the performance and behavior of a White, English-speaking, normatively invisible, racially color-evasive, socially dominant (WEIRD) class. In this article, we identify how scientific racism has influenced the study of cognition and offer perspective on how researchers may reconsider many of the premises that undergird our approach.
American Psychological Association. (2021). Apology to people of color for APA’s role in promoting, perpetuating, and failing to challenge racism, racial discrimination, and human hierarchy in U.S. https://www.apa.org/about/policy/racism-apology
2.
AnnammaS. A.JacksonD. D.MorrisonD. (2016). Conceptualizing color-evasiveness: Using dis/ability critical race theory to expand a color-blind racial ideology in education and society. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1248837
3.
AtranS. (1999). Itzaj Maya folk-biological taxonomy. In MedinD.AtranS. (Eds.), Folk biology (pp. 119–203). MIT Press.
4.
BacheR. M. (1895). Reaction time with reference to race. Psychological Review, 2(5), 475–486.
BenjaminL. T.Jr. (1988). A history of psychology: Original sources and contemporary research. McGraw-Hill.
7.
BlignautP.WiumD. (2014). Eye-tracking data quality as affected by ethnicity and experimental design. Behavior Research Methods, 46(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0343-0
8.
BlockN. (1995). The mind as the software of the brain. In SmithE. E.OshermanD. N. (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science: Vol. 3. Thinking (2nd ed., pp. 377–425). MIT Press.
9.
BoykinA. W. (1977). Experimental psychology from a Black perspective: Issues and examples. Journal of Black Psychology, 3(2), 29–49.
10.
ButterworthB.ReeveR. (2008). Verbal counting and spatial strategies in numerical tasks: Evidence from Indigenous Australia. Philosophical Psychology, 21(4), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080802284597
11.
ClancyK. B. H.DavisJ. L. (2019). Soylent is people, and WEIRD is White: Biological anthropology, Whiteness, and the limits of the WEIRD. Annual Review of Anthropology, 48(1), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011133
12.
EllisB. D.StamH. J. (2015). Crisis? What crisis? Cross-cultural psychology’s appropriation of cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology, 21(3), 293–317.
13.
EtienneA.LaroiaT.WeigleH.AfelinA.KellyS. K.KrishnanA.GroverP. (2020). Novel electrodes for reliable EEG recordings on coarse and curly hair. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (pp. 6151–6154). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176067
14.
FigueroaM. (in press). Language development, linguistic input, and linguistic racism. WIREs Cognitive Science.
15.
GentnerD.Goldin-MeadowS. (2003). Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. MIT Press.
16.
GibsonJ. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
17.
GuestO.MartinA. E. (2021). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16, 789–802. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585
18.
HartB.RisleyT. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of youngAmerican children. Brookes Publishing.
19.
HerrnsteinR. J.MurrayC. A. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. Free Press.
20.
JensenA. R. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement?Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1–123.
21.
KimH. (2002). We talk, therefore we think? A cultural analysis of the effect of talking on thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 828–842. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.4.828
22.
KredlowM. A.PinelesS. L.InslichtS. S.MarinM.-F.MiladM. R.OttoM. W.OrrS. P. (2017). Assessment of skin conductance in African American and non–African American participants in studies of conditioned fear. Psychophysiology, 54(11), 1741–1754. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12909
LewisN. A. (2021). What counts as good science? How the battle for methodological legitimacy affects public psychology. American Psychologist, 76(8), 1323–1333. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000870
25.
LoveB. L. (2019). We want to do more than survive: Abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom. Beacon Press.
26.
LucyJ. A. (1992). Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge University Press.
27.
MedinD. L.AtranS. (2004). The native mind: Biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychological Review, 111(4), 960–983. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.960
28.
Miller-CottoD.SmithL. V.WangA. H.RibnerA. D. (2022). Changing the conversation: A culturally responsive perspective on executive functions, minoritized children and their families. Infant and Child Development, 31(1), Article e2286. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2286
29.
MortonS. (1854). Excerpts from Morton’s inedited manuscripts. In NottJ.GiddonG. (Eds.), Types of mankind (pp. 298–327). Lippencott, Grambo, and Co.
NewellA.SimonH. A. (1956). The logic theory machine: A complex information processing system. Transactions on Information Theory (Institute of Radio Engineers), 2(3), 61–79.
ProctorR. W.VuK.-P. L. (2006). The cognitive revolution at age 50: Has the promise of the human information-processing approach been fulfilled?International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 21(3), 253–284. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc2103_1
34.
RiversW. H. R. (1905). Vision. In HaddonA. C. (Ed.), Reports of the Cambridge anthropological expedition to the Torres Straits (Vol. 2, Part 1, pp. 48–96). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1901)
35.
RobertsS. O.Bareket-ShavitC.DollinsF. A.GoldieP. D.MortensonE. (2020). Racial inequality in psychological research: Trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1295–1309.
36.
RogoffB.RogoffU. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
37.
RoschE.MervisC. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
38.
SegalE. M.LachmanR. (1972). Complex behavior or higher mental process: Is there a paradigm shift?American Psychologist, 27(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032254
39.
SegallM. H.CampbellD. T.HerskovitsM. J. (1963). Cultural differences in the perception of geometric illusions. Science, 139(3556), 769–771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.139.3556.769
40.
SmithL. B.ThelenE. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends Cognitive Science, 7(8), 343–348.
