How do people maintain a sense of control when they realize the noncontingencies in their personal life and their strong interdependence with other people? Why do individuals continue to act on overwhelming collective problems, such as climate change, that are clearly beyond their personal control? Group-based control theory proposes that it is social identification with agentic groups and engagement in collective action that serve to maintain and restore people’s sense of control, especially when their personal control is threatened. As a consequence, group-based control may enable people to act adaptively and stay healthy even when personal control seems futile. These claims are supported by evidence showing increased in-group identification and group-based action intentions following reminders of low personal control. Furthermore, these responses of identifying with agentic in-groups increase people’s perceived control and well-being. This article succinctly presents group-based control theory and relevant empirical findings. It also elaborates on how group-based control relates to other social-identity motives and how it may explain social phenomena.
AgroskinD.JonasE. (2013). Controlling death by defending ingroups — Mediational insights into terror management and control restoration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1144–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.014
2.
BukowskiM.de LemusS.Rodriguez-BailónR.WillisG. B. (2017). Who’s to blame? Causal attributions of the economic crisis and personal control. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 20(6), 909–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216638529
3.
CastanoE.DechesneM. (2005). On defeating death: Group reification and social identification as immortality strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 16(1), 221–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280500436024
4.
ChengC.CheungS. F.ChioJ. H.ChanM.-P. S. (2013). Cultural meaning of perceived control: A meta-analysis of locus of control and psychological symptoms across 18 cultural regions. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 152–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028596
5.
CzepluchF.JugertP.FritscheI.FrankeB. (2021). How we empowers me: Group-based reactions to heighten perceived control [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Wilhelm Wundt Institute for Psychology, Leipzig University.
6.
EssesV. M.JacksonL. M.ArmstrongT. L. (1998). Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 54(4), 699–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998.tb01244.x
7.
FritscheI.JonasE.AblasserC.BeyerM.KubanJ.MangerA.-M.SchultzM. (2013). The power of we: Evidence for group-based control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.014
8.
FritscheI.JonasE.FankhänelT. (2008). The role of control motivation in mortality salience effects on ingroup support and defense. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 524–541. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012666
9.
FritscheI.JonasE.KesslerT. (2011). Collective reactions to threat: Implications for intergroup conflict and solving societal crises. Social Issues and Policy Review, 5(1), 101–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2011.01027.x
10.
FritscheI.MassonT. (2021). Collective climate action: When do people turn into collective environmental agents?Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.05.001
11.
FritscheI.MoyaM.BukowskiM.JugertP.de LemusS.DeckerO.Valor-SeguraI.Navarro-CarrilloG. (2017). The great recession and group-based control: Converting personal helplessness into social class in-group trust and collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12207
12.
GoodeC.KeeferL. A.BranscombeN. R.MolinaL. E. (2017). Group identity as a source of threat and means of compensation: Establishing personal control through group identification and ideology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(3), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2259
13.
GreenawayK. H.HaslamS. A.CruwysT.BranscombeN. R.YsseldykR.HeldrethC. (2015). From “we” to “me”: Group identification enhances perceived personal control with consequences for health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000019
14.
GreenawayK. H.LouisW. R.HornseyM. J.JonesJ. M. (2014). Perceived control qualifies the effects of threat on prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(3), 422–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12049
15.
HoggM. A. (2021). Uncertain self in a changing world: A foundation for radicalisation, populism, and autocratic leadership. European Review of Social Psychology, 32(2), 235–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1827628
16.
HoppeA.BeckerA.FritscheI.LautenbacherJ. (2021). Make it through the tough times as a group: On the importance of collective predictors of epidemic protection behavior and policy acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic [Manuscript in preparation]. Wilhelm Wundt Institute for Psychology, Leipzig University.
17.
HornseyM. J.FieldingK. S.McStayR.ReserJ. P.BradleyG. L.GreenawayK. H. (2015). Evidence for motivated control: Understanding the paradoxical link between threat and efficacy beliefs about climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.02.003
18.
HornseyM. J.GreenawayK. H.HarrisE. A.BainP. G. (2019). Exploring cultural differences in the extent to which people perceive and desire control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167218780692
19.
JonasE.McGregorI.KlacklJ.AgroskinD.FritscheI.HolbrookC.NashK.ProulxT.QuirinM. (2014). Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach. In OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 49, pp. 219–286). Academic Press.
20.
JugertP.GreenawayK. H.BarthM.BüchnerR.EisentrautS.FritscheI. (2016). Collective efficacy increases pro-environmental intentions through increasing self-efficacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.08.003
21.
LandauM. J.KayA. C.WhitsonJ. A. (2015). Compensatory control and the appeal of a structured world. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 694–722. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038703
22.
LautenbacherJ.FritscheI. (2022). Agency through hierarchy? A group-based account of increased approval of social hierarchies under conditions of threatened control [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Wilhelm Wundt Institute for Psychology, Leipzig University.
23.
NijsT.VerkuytenM.MartinovicB. (2021). Losing what is OURS: The intergroup consequences of collective ownership threat. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220980809
24.
PrestonJ.WegnerD. M. (2005). Ideal agency: The perception of self as an origin of action. In TesserA.WoodJ. V.StapelD. A. (Eds.), On building, defending, and regulating the self: A psychological perspective (pp. 103–125). Psychology Press.
25.
ProudfootD.KayA. C. (2018). How perceptions of one’s organization can affect perceptions of the self: Membership in a stable organization can sustain individuals’ sense of control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.01.004
26.
ReicherS. D.SpearsR.HaslamS. A. (2010). The social identity approach in social psychology. In WetherellM. S.MohantyC. T. (Eds.), Sage identities handbook (pp. 45–62). Sage.
27.
RelkeS.FritscheI.MassonT.KleineA.-K.ThienK.von GlahnL.LeuteritzK.RichterD. (2021). Personal condition but social cure: Agentic ingroups elevate well-being in chronically ill patients through perceptions of personal control. British Journal of Health Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12567
28.
RothbaumF.WeiszJ. R.SnyderS. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 5–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.5
StollbergJ.FritscheI.BäckerA. (2015). Striving for group agency: Threat to personal control increases the attractiveness of agentic groups. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 649. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00649
31.
StollbergJ.FritscheI.BarthM.JugertP. (2017). Extending control perceptions to the social self: Ingroups serve the restoration of control. In BukowskiM.FritscheI.GuinoteA.KoftaM. (Eds.), Coping with lack of control in a social world (pp. 133–150). Routledge.
32.
StollbergJ.FritscheI.JonasE. (2017). The groupy shift: Conformity to liberal in-group norms as a group-based response to threatened personal control. Social Cognition, 35(4), 374–394. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.374
33.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
34.
van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
