Worldwide population aging and rapid diffusion of digital technology have converged to produce an age-related digital divide in the adoption of technology, as seen in use of the Internet and ownership of smartphones. Given the centrality of these technologies for full participation in modern society, reducing that gap is an important challenge for psychologists. We outline more and less malleable factors associated with the adoption of technology and argue that interventions that can change both the aging user and the design of products will be necessary. Adaptive technology systems that incorporate artificial intelligence and extended reality are promising new approaches to reducing the age-related digital divide.
CharnessN. (2017). Foreword. In KwonS. (Ed.), Gerontechnology: Research, practice, and principles in the field of technology and aging (pp. xxvii–xxix). Springer Publishing.
3.
CharnessN.BootW. R. (2009). Aging and information technology use: Potential and barriers. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01647.x
4.
CharnessN.BootW. R.GrayN. (2020). Mobile monitoring and intervention (MMI) technology for adaptive aging. In Mobile technology for adaptive aging: Proceedings of a Workshop (pp. 21–40). National Academies Press.
5.
ChenK.LouV. W. Q. (2020). Measuring senior technology acceptance: Development of a brief, 14-item scale. Innovation in Aging, 4(3), Article igaa016. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa016
6.
CzajaS. J.BootW. R.CharnessN.RogersW. A. (2019). Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches (3rd ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b22189
7.
CzajaS. J.BootW. R.CharnessN.RogersW. A.SharitJ. (2017). Improving social support for older adults through technology: Findings from the PRISM randomized control trial. The Gerontologist, 58(3), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw249
8.
CzajaS. J.CharnessN.FiskA. D.HertzogC.NairS. N.RogersW. A.SharitJ. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333
KimS.ChoudhuryA. (2021). Exploring older adults’ perception and use of smart speaker-based voice assistants: A longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, Article 106914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106914
13.
LeeC. C.CzajaS. J.MoxleyJ. H.SharitJ.BootW. R.CharnessN.RogersW. A. (2019). Attitudes toward computers across adulthood from 1994 to 2013. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny081
MistryN.KeepanasserilA.WilczynskiN. L.NieuwlaatR.RavallM.HaynesR. B., & the Patient Adherence Review Team. (2015). Technology-mediated interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(e1), e177–e193. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocu047
16.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1995). Falling through the net: A survey of the “have nots” in rural and urban America. U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fallingthru.html
NickersonR. S. (1999). How we know—and sometimes misjudge—what others know: Imputing one’s own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 737–759. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.737
RoqueN. A.BootW. R. (2018). A new tool for assessing mobile device proficiency in older adults: The Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 37(2), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464816642582
22.
RoqueN. A.BootW. R. (2021). A new tool for assessing older adults’ wireless network proficiency: The Wireless Network Proficiency Questionnaire. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 40(5), 541–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464820935000
23.
RoviraE.McLaughlinA. C.PakR.HighL. (2019). Looking for age differences in self-driving vehicles: Examining the effects of automation reliability, driving risk, and physical impairment on trust. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 800. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00800
24.
SalvendyG. (Ed.). (2012). Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
25.
SchmidtL. I.WahlH.-W. (2019). Predictors of performance in everyday technology tasks in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny062
26.
SharitJ.MoxleyJ. H.CzajaS. J. (2021). Investigating older adults’ willingness to invest time to acquire technology skills using a discounting approach. Innovation in Aging, 5(2), Article igab017. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab017
27.
SimonsD. J.BootW. R.CharnessN.GathercoleS. E.ChabrisC. F.HambrickD. Z.Stine-MorrowE. A. L. (2016). Do “brain training” programs work?Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(3), 103–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100616661983
28.
SportilloD.PaljicA.OjedaL. (2018). Get ready for automated driving using Virtual Reality. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 118, 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.06.003
29.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.). Characteristics of the employed: 11b. Employed persons by detailed occupation and age. Retrieved March29, 2021, from https://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_aa2020.htm#charemp
30.
VenkateshV.ThongJ. Y. L.XuX. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
31.
XieB.CharnessN.FingermanK.KayeJ.KimM. T.KhurshidA. (2020). When going digital becomes a necessity: Ensuring older adults’ needs for information, services, and social inclusion during COVID-19. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 32(4–5), 460–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2020.1771237
