Life-Span Learning and Development and Its Implications for Workplace Training

Abstract

Researchers often focus on age-related declines rather than the development associated with lifelong learning. Focusing on working-age people (those between the ages of 18 and 70), I describe age-related changes in abilities and motivation that affect lifelong learning and research showing that older learners can and do learn when content is aligned with their prior knowledge and interests. I further describe lifelong learning in the context of workplace training and development, highlighting the workplace as a central environment for continuous learning and the imperative for workers to continually update their skills to remain employed and employable.

Keywords

life-span development lifelong learning training aging

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerman

P. L.

(2000). Domain-specific knowledge as the “dark matter” of adult intelligence: Gf/Gc, personality and interest correlates. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55(2), P69–P84. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/55.2.P69

Ackerman

P. L.

Beier

M. E.

(2006). Determinants of domain knowledge and independent study learning in an adult sample. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 366–381. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.366

Baltes

P. B.

Baltes

M. M.

(1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In Baltes

P. B.

Baltes

M. M.

(Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511665684.003

Baltes

P. B.

Reese

H. W.

Lipsitt

L. P.

(1980). Life-span developmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 65–110.

Beier

M. E.

(2019). The impact of technology on workforce skill learning. Work Science Center, Georgia Institute of Technology. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/61063

Beier

M. E.

Ackerman

P. L.

(2005). Age, ability, and the role of prior knowledge on the acquisition of new domain knowledge: Promising results in a real-world learning environment. Psychology and Aging, 20(2), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.2.341

Callahan

J. S.

Kiker

D. S.

Cross

(2003). Does method matter? A meta-analysis of the effects of training method on older learner training performance. Journal of Management, 29(5), 663–680.

Carstensen

L. L.

Isaacowitz

D. M.

Charles

S. T.

(1999). Taking time seriously. A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165

Carter

Beier

M. E.

(2010). The effectiveness of error management training with working-aged adults. Personnel Psychology, 63(3), 641–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01183.x

10.

Cox

C. B.

Beier

M. E.

(2009). The moderating effect of individual differences on the relationship between the framing of training and interest in training. International Journal of Training and Development, 13(4), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2009.00330.x

11.

Helfrich

C. D.

Rose

A. J.

Hartmann

C. W.

Bodegom-Vos

Graham

I. D.

Wood

S. J.

Majerczyk

B. R.

Good

C. B.

Pogach

L. M.

Ball

S. L.

D. H.

Aron

D. C.

(2018). How the dual process model of human cognition can inform efforts to de-implement ineffective and harmful clinical practices: A preliminary model of unlearning and substitution. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 24(1), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12855

12.

Hertzog

Kramer

A. F.

Wilson

R. S.

Lindenberger

(2008). Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development: Can the functional capacity of older adults be preserved and enhanced? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(1), 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x

13.

Kanfer

Ackerman

P. L.

(2004). Aging, adult development, and work motivation. The Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 440–458. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159053

14.

Kooij

D. T. A. M.

de Lange

A. H.

Jansen

P. G. W.

Kanfer

Dikkers

J. S. E.

(2011). Age and work-related motives: Results of a meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 197–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.665

15.

Kubeck

J. E.

Delp

N. D.

Haslett

T. K.

McDaniel

M. A.

(1996). Does job-related training performance decline with age? Psychology and Aging, 11(1), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.11.1.92

16.

Lopina

E. C.

Rogelberg

S. G.

Woznyj

(2019). Understanding older workers’ decisions to participate in voluntary training opportunities. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 18(4), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000235

17.

Maurer

T. J.

Weiss

E. M.

Barbeite

F. G.

(2003). A model of involvement in work-related learning and development activity: The effects of individual, situational, motivational, and age variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 707–724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.707

18.

Moghimi

Zacher

Scheibe

Van Yperen

N. W.

(2017). The selection, optimization, and compensation model in the work context: A systematic review and meta-analysis of two decades of research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2), 247–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2108

19.

T. W. H.

Feldman

D. C.

(2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 392–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392

20.

Posthuma

R. A.

Campion

M. A.

(2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35(1), 158–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318617

21.

Salthouse

T. A.

(2019). Trajectories of normal cognitive aging. Psychology and Aging, 34(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000288

22.

Schaie

K. W.

(2013). Developmental influences on adult intelligence: The Seattle Longitudinal Study (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

23.

Sonnega

Faul

J. D.

Ofstedal

M. B.

Langa

K. M.

Phillips

J. W. R.

Weir

D. R.

(2014). Cohort profile: The Health and Retirement Study (HRS). International Journal of Epidemiology, 43(2), 576–585. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu067

24.

Toossi

Torpey

(2017). Older workers: Labor force trends and career options: Career outlook. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2017/article/older-workers.htm

25.

Torres

W. J.

Beier

M. E.

(2018). Adult development in the wild: The determinants of autonomous learning in a Massive Open Online Course. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.06.003

26.

Torres

W. J.

Bradford

B. C.

Beier

M. E.

(2019). Technology and the aging worker: A review and agenda for future research. In Landers

R. N.

(Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of technology and employee behavior (pp. 608–640). Cambridge University Press.

27.

Wolfson

N. E.

Cavanagh

T. M.

Kraiger

(2014). Older adults and technology-based instruction: Optimizing learning outcomes and transfer. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0056

28.

World at Work. (2020, January 22). Average age for C-suite member is 56. Workspan Daily. https://www.worldatwork.org/workspan/articles/average-age-for-c-suite-member-is-56