Humanity faces twin problems of adaptation—natural environmental challenges of climate change and global humanitarian challenges of ensuring well-being for all—that pose a dilemma for sustainable development. One way forward is to develop cultures of sustainability that highlight and reward the ideas and practices that will help us transition to a sustainable lifestyle. Although institutional responses are necessary and multidisciplinary approaches are required, individual citizens can also participate in cultural dynamics—the process of cultural formation, maintenance, and transformation—to craft cultures of sustainability, and psychological science can point to potential mechanisms for effecting this cultural change. Informed by the niche-construction perspective, I suggest that the critical ingredients of cultures of sustainability include (a) conceptions of human–nature connectedness, (b) conceptions of human–artifact relation, (c) interpersonal conversations about sustainability norms within social networks, and (d) visions of an achievable utopia for a sustainable future. Further research and action are called for.
AtranS.MedinD.RossN.LynchE.VapnarskyV.Ek’E. U.. . . BaranM. (2002). Folkecology, cultural epidemiology, and the spirit of the commons. Current Anthropology, 43, 421–441.
2.
BangM.MedinD. L.AtranS. (2007). Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 13868–13874. doi:10.1073/pnas.0706627104
BrookeJ. L. (2014). Climate change and the course of global history: A rough journey. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5.
ClaytonS. (2012). Environment and identity. In ClaytonS. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 164–180). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
DescolaP. (2013). Beyond nature and culture (LloydJ., Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
FernandoJ. W.BurdenN. J.FergusonA.O’BrienL. V.JudgeM.KashimaY. (2018). Functions of utopia: How utopian thinking motivates societal engagement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 779–792. doi:10.1177/0146167217748604
9.
FernandoJ. W.O’BrienL. V.BurdenN. J.JudgeM.KashimaY. (2020). Greens or space invaders: Prominent utopian themes and effects on social change motivation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 278–291. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2607
10.
HardinG. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248. doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
11.
JostJ. T.FedericoC. M.NapierJ. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
12.
JudgeM.FernandoJ. W.PaladinoA.KashimaY. (2020). Folk theories of artifact creation: How intuitions about human labor influence the value of artifacts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24, 195–211
13.
JudgeM.FernandoJ. W.PaladinoA.MikolajczakG.KashimaY. (2020). Lay concepts of art, craft, and manufacture and the implications for sustainable consumption. Journal of Social Issues, 76, 19–34 doi:10.1111/josi.12368
14.
KashimaY.BainP.PerforsA. (2019). The psychology of cultural dynamics: What is it, what is known, and what is yet to be known?Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 499–529. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103112
15.
KashimaY.PaladinoA.MargettsE. A. (2014). Environmentalist identity and environmental striving. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 64–75. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.014
16.
KellertS. R. (2005). Building for life: Designing and understanding the human–nature connection. Washington, DC: Island Press.
17.
KesebirS.KesebirP. (2017). A growing disconnection from nature is evident in cultural products. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 258–269. doi:10.1177/1745691616662473
18.
LalandK. N.Odling-SmeeJ. F.FeldmanM. W. (2000). Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 131–146. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00002417
19.
LevitasR. (1990). The concept of utopia. London, England: Philip Allan.
20.
MannheimK. (1936). Ideology and utopia: An introduction of the sociology of knowledge. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
21.
MilinskiM.SemmannD.KrambeckH.-J.MarotzkeJ. (2006). Stabilizing the Earth’s climate is not a losing game: Supporting evidence from public goods experiments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 3994–3998. doi:10.1073/pnas.0504902103
22.
MoreT. (2014). Utopia. (MillerC. H., Trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Original work published 1516
23.
NordhausW. (2019). Climate change: The ultimate challenge for economics. American Economic Review, 109, 1991–2014. doi:10.1257/aer.109.6.1991
24.
O’BrienL. V.MeisJ.AndersonR. C.RizioS. M.AmbroseM.BruceG.. . . KashimaY. (2018). Low Carbon Readiness Index: A short measure to predict private low carbon behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 57, 34–44. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.06.005
25.
ojalehtob. I.MedinD. L.GarciaS. G. (2017). Grounding principles for inferring agency: Two cultural perspectives. Cognitive Psychology, 95, 50–78. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.04.001
26.
OstromE. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
OstromE. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325, 419–422. doi:10.1126/science.1172133
28.
RichersonP. J.BoydR. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
RockströmJ.SteffenW.NooneK.PerssonA.ChapinF. S.LambinE. F.. . . FoleyJ. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475. doi:10.1038/461472a
ShankD. B.KashimaY.PetersK.LiY.RobinsG.KirleyM. (2018). Norm talk and human cooperation: Can we talk ourselves into cooperation?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, 99–123. doi:10.1037/pspi0000163
33.
SparkmanG.WaltonG. M. (2017). Dynamic norms promote sustainable behavior, even if it is couternormative. Psychological Science, 28, 1663–1674. doi:10.1177/0956797617719950
34.
SternP. C. (2011). Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. American Psychologist, 66, 303–314. doi:10.1037/a0023235
van der WerffE.StegL.KeizerK. (2013). The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 55–63. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.006
38.
WhitmarshL.O’NeillS. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 305–314. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003
39.
WilsonE. O.KellertS. R. (2013). The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Shearwater.
40.
WolffP.MedinD. L.PankratzC. (1999). Evolution and devolution of folkbiological knowledge. Cognition, 73, 177–204. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00051-7
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
