Recent research has examined the sexualization–objectification link (i.e., whether sexualized individuals are appraised as if they were objects rather than persons). This research has found that sexualized individuals are more likely to be processed and categorized as if they were objects and are also perceived as possessing fewer humanlike traits than nonsexualized individuals. In addition, sexualization prompts negative behaviors such as social exclusion. Altogether, these findings shed light on mechanisms that might underlie violence toward sexualized individuals.
AndrighettoL.BraccoF.ChiorriC.MasiniM.PassarelliM.PiccinnoT. F. (2019). Now you see me, now you don’t: Detecting sexual objectification through a change blindness paradigm. Cognitive Processing, 20, 419–429. doi:10.1007/s10339-019-00927-w
5.
BernardP.ContentJ.DeltenreP.ColinC. (2018). When the body becomes no more than the sum of its parts: The neural correlates of scrambled versus intact sexualized bodies. NeuroReport, 29, 48–53. doi:10.1097/WNR.0000000000000926
6.
BernardP.GervaisS. J.AllenJ.CampomizziS.KleinO. (2012). Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis. Psychological Science, 23, 469–471. doi:10.1177/0956797611434748
7.
BernardP.GervaisS. J.AllenJ.DelméeA.KleinO. (2015). From sex objects to human beings: Masked sexual body parts and humanization as moderators to women’s objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 432–446. doi:10.1177/0361684315580125
8.
BernardP.GervaisS. J.KleinO. (2018). Objectifying objectification: When and why people are cognitively reduced to their parts akin to objects. European Review of Social Psychology, 29, 82–121. doi:10.1080/10463283.2018.1471949
9.
BernardP.HanoteauF.GervaisS.ServaisL.BertoloneI.DeltenreP.ColinC. (2019). Revealing clothing does not make the object: ERP evidences that cognitive objectification is driven by posture suggestiveness, not by revealing clothing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 16–36. doi:10.1177/0146167218775690
10.
BernardP.RizzoT.HoonhorstI.DeliensG.GervaisS. J.EberlenJ.. . . KleinO. (2018). The neural correlates of cognitive objectification: An ERP study on the body inversion effect associated with sexualized bodies. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 550–559. doi:10.1177/1948550617714582
11.
BernardP.WollastR. (2019). Why is sexualization dehumanizing? The effects of posture suggestiveness and revealing clothing on dehumanization. SAGE Open, 9(1). doi:10.1177/2158244019828230
12.
CikaraM.EberhardtJ. L.FiskeS. T. (2011). From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 540–551. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21497
13.
CivileC.ObhiS. S. (2016). Power, objectification, and recognition of sexualized women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 199–212. doi:10.1177/0361684315604820
14.
CogoniC.CarnaghiA.MitrovicA.LederH.FantoniC.SilaniG. (2018). Understanding the mechanisms behind the sexualized-body inversion hypothesis: The role of asymmetry and attention biases. PLOS ONE, 13(4), Article e0193944. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193944
15.
CogoniC.CarnaghiA.SilaniG. (2018). Reduced empathic responses for sexually objectified women: An fMRI investigation. Cortex, 99, 258–272. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.11.020
16.
DecetyJ.JacksonP. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3, 71–100. doi:10.1177/1534582304267187
17.
de GelderB.Van den StockJ.MeerenH. K. M.SinkeC. B. A.KretM. E.TamiettoM. (2010). Standing up for the body. Recent progress in uncovering the networks involved in processing bodies and bodily expressions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 513–527. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.008
18.
FengC.WangL.WangN.GuR.LuoY.-J. (2012). The time course of implicit processing of erotic pictures: An event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1489, 48–55. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.10.019
19.
FincherK. M.TetlockP. E. (2016). Perceptual dehumanization of faces is activated by norm violations and facilitates norm enforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 131–146. doi:10.1037/xge0000132
20.
FincherK. M.TetlockP. E.MorrisM. W. (2017). Interfacing with faces: Perceptual humanization and dehumanization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 288–293. doi:10.1177/0963721417705390
21.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
22.
GrayK.KnobeJ.SheskinM.BloomP.BarrettL. (2011). More than a body: Mind perception and the nature of objectification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1207–1220. doi:10.1037/a0025883
23.
HattonE.TrautnerM. N. (2011). Equal opportunity objectification? The sexualization of men and women on the cover of Rolling Stone. Sexuality & Culture, 15, 256–278. doi:10.1007/s12119-011-9093-2
24.
HietanenJ. K.NummenmaaL. (2011). The naked truth: The face and body sensitive N170 response is larger for nude bodies. PLOS ONE, 6, Article e24408. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024408
25.
HugenbergK.YoungS.RydellR. J.AlmarazS.StankoK. A.SeeP. E.WilsonJ. P. (2016). The face of humanity: Configural face processing influences ascriptions of humanness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 167–175. doi:10.1177/1948550615609734
26.
LoughnanS.HaslamN.MurnaneT.VaesJ.ReynoldsC.SuitnerC. (2010). Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 709–717. doi:10.1002/ejsp.755
27.
LoughnanS.PinaA.VasquezE. A.PuviaE. (2013). Sexual objectification increases rape victim blame and decreases perceived suffering. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 3, 7455–7461. doi:10.1177/0361684313485718
28.
MarR. A. (2011). The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 103–134. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145406
29.
MoradiB.HuangY. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x
30.
NummenmaaL.HietanenJ. K.SanttilaP.HyönäJ. (2012). Gender and visibility of sexual cues influence eye movements while viewing faces and bodies. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1439–1451. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9911-0
31.
PacilliM. G.PagliaroS.LoughnanS.GramazioS.SpaccatiniF.BaldryA. C. (2017). Sexualization reduces helping intentions towards female victims of intimate partner violence through mediation of moral patiency. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 293–313. doi:10.1111/bjso.12169
32.
SingerT.LammC. (2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 81–96. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04418.x
33.
VaesJ.CristoforettiG.RuzzanteD.CogoniC.MazzaV. (2019). Assessing neural responses towards objectified human targets and objects to identify processes of sexual objectification that go beyond the metaphor. Scientific Reports, 9, Article 6699. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42928-x
34.
VaesJ.PaladinoM. P.PuviaE. (2011). Are sexualized women complete human beings? Why men and women dehumanize sexually objectified women. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 774–785. doi:10.1002/ejsp.824
35.
WardL. M. (2016). Media and sexualization: State of empirical research, 1995–2015. The Journal of Sex Research, 53, 560–577. doi:10.1080/00224499.2016.1142496
36.
WilliamsK. D.CheungC. K.ChoiW. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748–762. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.748
37.
WilsonJ. P.YoungS. G.RuleN. O.HugenbergK. (2018). Configural processing and social judgments: Face inversion particularly disrupts inferences of human-relevant traits. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.07.007