More intelligent individuals typically show faster reaction times. However, individual differences in reaction times do not represent individual differences in a single cognitive process but in multiple cognitive processes. Thus, it is unclear whether the association between mental speed and intelligence reflects advantages in a specific cognitive process or in general processing speed. In this article, we present a neurocognitive-psychometrics account of mental speed that decomposes the relationship between mental speed and intelligence. We summarize research employing mathematical models of cognition and chronometric analyses of neural processing to identify distinct stages of information processing strongly related to intelligence differences. Evidence from both approaches suggests that the speed of higher-order processing is greater in smarter individuals, which may reflect advantages in the structural and functional organization of brain networks. Adopting a similar neurocognitive-psychometrics approach for other cognitive processes associated with intelligence (e.g., working memory or executive control) may refine our understanding of the basic cognitive processes of intelligence.
BazanaP. G.StelmackR. M. (2002). Intelligence and information processing during an auditory discrimination task with backward masking: An event-related potential analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 998–1008. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.998
2.
BoothT.BastinM. E.PenkeL.ManiegaS. M.MurrayC.RoyleN. A.. . . DearyI. J. (2013). Brain white matter tract integrity and cognitive abilities in community-dwelling older people: The Lothian Birth Cohort, 1936. Neuropsychology, 27, 595–607. doi:10.1037/a0033354
3.
ChuderskiA. (2013). When are fluid intelligence and working memory isomorphic and when are they not?Intelligence, 41, 244–262. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.003
4.
DoeblerP.SchefflerB. (2016). The relationship of choice reaction time variability and intelligence: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 157–166. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.02.009
5.
EngleR. W. (2018). Working memory and executive attention: A revisit. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 190–193. doi:10.1177/1745691617720478
6.
FerrerE.WhitakerK. J.SteeleJ. S.GreenC. T.WendelkenC.BungeS. A. (2013). White matter maturation supports the development of reasoning ability through its influence on processing speed. Developmental Science, 16, 941–951. doi:10.1111/desc.12088
7.
FrischkornG. T.SchubertA.-L. (2018). Cognitive models in intelligence research: Advantages and recommendations for their application. Journal of Intelligence, 6(3), Article 34. doi:10.3390/jintelligence6030034
8.
FrischkornG. T.SchubertA.-L.HagemannD. (2019). Processing speed, working memory, and executive functions: Independent or inter-related predictors of general intelligence. Intelligence, 75, 95–110. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2019.05.003
9.
FryA. F.HaleS. (1996). Processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence: Evidence for a developmental cascade. Psychological Science, 7, 237–241.
10.
FuhrmannD.Simpson-KentI. L.BatheltJ., the CALM Team, & KievitR. A. (2020). A hierarchical watershed model of fluid intelligence in childhood and adolescence. Cerebral Cortex, 30, 339–352. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhz091
11.
HedgeC.PowellG.SumnerP. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 1166–1186. doi:10/gddfm4
12.
JensenA. R. (1998). The g factor—The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
13.
JensenA. R. (2006). Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
14.
KailR.SalthouseT. A. (1994). Processing speed as a mental capacity. Acta Psychologica, 86, 199–225. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(94)90003-5
15.
KapanciT.MerksS.RammsayerT. H.TrocheS. J. (2019). On the relationship between P3 latency and mental ability as a function of increasing demands in a selective attention task. Brain Sciences, 9(2), Article 28. doi:10.3390/brainsci9020028
16.
KievitR. A.DavisS. W.GriffithsJ.CorreiaM. M.Cam-CAN, & HensonR. N. (2016). A watershed model of individual differences in fluid intelligence. Neuropsychologia, 91, 186–198. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.08.008
17.
KovacsK.ConwayA. R. A. (2016). Process overlap theory: A unified account of the general factor of intelligence. Psychological Inquiry, 27, 151–177. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2016.1153946
PartchevI.De BoeckP. (2012). Can fast and slow intelligence be differentiated?Intelligence, 40, 23–32. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2011.11.002
20.
PenkeL.ManiegaS. M.BastinM. E.Valdés HernándezM. C.MurrayC.RoyleN. A.. . . DearyI. J. (2012). Brain white matter tract integrity as a neural foundation for general intelligence. Molecular Psychiatry, 17, 1026–1030. doi:10.1038/mp.2012.66
21.
RatcliffR. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59
22.
RatcliffR.ThaparA.McKoonG. (2010). Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 127–157. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.09.001
23.
Rey-MermetA.GadeM.OberauerK. (2018). Should we stop thinking about inhibition? Searching for individual and age differences in inhibition ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 501–526. doi:10.1037/xlm0000450
24.
SalthouseT. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.
25.
SavilleC. W. N.BecklesK. D. O.MacLeodC. A.FeigeB.BiscaldiM.BeauducelA.KleinC. (2016). A neural analogue of the worst performance rule: Insights from single-trial event-related potentials. Intelligence, 55, 95–103. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.12.005
26.
SchmiedekF.OberauerK.WilhelmO.SüssH.-M.WittmannW. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414–429. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.414
27.
SchubertA.-L.FrischkornG. T.HagemannD.VossA. (2016). Trait characteristics of diffusion model parameters. Journal of Intelligence, 4(3), Article 7. doi:10.3390/jintelligence4030007
28.
SchubertA.-L.HagemannD.FrischkornG. T. (2017). Is general intelligence little more than the speed of higher-order processing?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 1498–1512. doi:10.1037/xge0000325
29.
SchubertA.-L.HagemannD.FrischkornG. T.HerpertzS. C. (2018). Faster, but not smarter: An experimental analysis of the relationship between mental speed and mental abilities. Intelligence, 71, 66–75. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2018.10.005
30.
SchubertA.-L.HagemannD.LöfflerC.FrischkornG. T. (2020). Disentangling the effects of processing speed on the association between age differences and fluid intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 8(1), Article 1. doi:10.3390/jintelligence8010001
31.
SchubertA.-L.HagemannD.LöfflerC.RummelJ.ArnauS. (2019). A chronometric model of the relationship between frontal midline theta functional connectivity and human intelligence. PsyArXiv Preprints. doi:10.31234/osf.io/5yru4
TrocheS. J.HoulihanM. E.StelmackR. M.RammsayerT. H. (2009). Mental ability, P300, and mismatch negativity: Analysis of frequency and duration discrimination. Intelligence, 37, 365–373. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2009.03.002
34.
TrocheS. J.IndermühleR.LeutholdH.RammsayerT. H. (2015). Intelligence and the psychological refractory period: A lateralized readiness potential study. Intelligence, 53, 138–144. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.10.003
35.
van der MaasH. L. J.DolanC. V.GrasmanR. P. P. P.WichertsJ. M.HuizengaH. M.RaijmakersM. E. J. (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 113, 842–861. doi:10/c3jm44
36.
van der MaasH. L. J.MolenaarD.MarisG.KievitR. A.BorsboomD. (2011). Cognitive psychology meets psychometric theory: On the relation between process models for decision making and latent variable models for individual differences. Psychological Review, 118, 339–356. doi:10/drf5nw
37.
VernonP. A. (Ed.). (1987). Speed of information-processing and intelligence. Westport, CT: Ablex.
38.
WendelkenC.FerrerE.GhettiS.BaileyS. K.CuttingL.BungeS. A. (2017). Frontoparietal structural connectivity in childhood predicts development of functional connectivity and reasoning ability: A large-scale longitudinal investigation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 8549–8558. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3726-16.2017
39.
WendelkenC.FerrerE.WhitakerK. J.BungeS. A. (2016). Fronto-parietal network reconfiguration supports the development of reasoning ability. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 2178–2190. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv050
40.
WhiteC. N.ServantM.LoganG. D. (2018). Testing the validity of conflict drift-diffusion models for use in estimating cognitive processes: A parameter-recovery study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 286–301. doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1271-2
