Modernizing Conceptions of Valuation and Cognitive-Control Deployment in Adolescent Risk Taking

Abstract

Heightened risk taking in adolescence has long been attributed to valuation systems overwhelming the deployment of cognitive control. However, this explanation of why adolescents engage in risk taking is insufficient given increasing evidence that risk-taking behavior can be strategic and involve elevated cognitive control. We argue that applying the expected-value-of-control computational model to adolescent risk taking can clarify under what conditions control is elevated or diminished during risky decision-making. Through this lens, we review research examining when adolescent risk taking might be due to—rather than a failure of—effective cognitive control and suggest compelling ways to test such hypotheses. This effort can resolve when risk taking arises from an immaturity of the control system itself, as opposed to arising from differences in what adolescents value relative to adults. It can also identify promising avenues for channeling cognitive control toward adaptive outcomes in adolescence.

Keywords

cognitive control valuation risk taking adolescence computational modeling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barkley-Levenson

Galván

(2014). Neural representation of expected value in the adolescent brain. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 1646–1651. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319762111

Berkman

E. T.

Hutcherson

C. A.

Livingston

J. L.

Kahn

L. E.

Inzlicht

. (2017). Self-control as value-based choice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 422–428. doi:10.1177/0963721417704394

Casey

B. J.

Getz

Galvan

(2008). The adolescent brain. Developmental Review, 28, 62–77. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.003

Casey

B. J.

Heller

A. S.

Gee

D. G.

Cohen

A. O.

(2019). Development of the emotional brain. Neuroscience Letters, 693, 29–34. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2017.11.055

Chein

Albert

O’Brien

Uckert

Steinberg

(2011). Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain’s reward circuitry. Developmental Science, 14(2), F1–F10. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01035.x

Cohen

J. D.

Dunbar

McClelland

J. L.

(1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.332

Cohen

J. R.

Asarnow

R. F.

Sabb

F. W.

Bilder

R. M.

Bookheimer

S. Y.

Knowlton

B. J.

Poldrack

R. A.

(2010). A unique adolescent response to reward prediction errors. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 669–671. doi:10.1038/nn.2558

Crone

E. A.

Dahl

R. E.

(2012). Understanding adolescence as a period of social-affective engagement and goal flexibility. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 636–650. doi:10.1038/nrn3313

Davidow

J. Y.

Foerde

Galván

Shohamy

Dahl

R. E.

Crone

E. A.

Gluck

M. A.

(2016). An upside to reward sensitivity: The hippocampus supports enhanced reinforcement learning in adolescence. Neuron, 92, 93–99. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.08.031

10.

Davidow

J. Y.

Insel

Somerville

L. H.

(2018). Adolescent development of value-guided goal pursuit. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 725–736. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.05.003

11.

Daw

N. D.

Niv

Dayan

(2005). Uncertainty-based competition between prefrontal and dorsolateral striatal systems for behavioral control. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1704–1711. doi:10.1038/nn1560

12.

Daw

N. D.

O’Doherty

J. P.

Dayan

Seymour

Dolan

R. J.

(2006). Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans. Nature, 441, 876–879. doi:10.1038/nature04766

13.

Decker

J. H.

Lourenco

F. S.

Doll

B. B.

Hartley

C. A.

(2015). Experiential reward learning outweighs instruction prior to adulthood. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 310–320. doi:10.3758/s13415-014-0332-5

14.

Decker

J. H.

Otto

A. R.

Daw

N. D.

Hartley

C. A.

(2016). From creatures of habit to goal-directed learners: Tracking the developmental emergence of model-based reinforcement learning. Psychological Science, 27, 848–858. doi:10.1177/0956797616639301

15.

K. T.

Guassi Moreira

J. F.

Telzer

E. H.

(2016). But is helping you worth the risk? Defining prosocial risk taking in adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 260–271. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.008

16.

Figner

Mackinlay

R. J.

Wilkening

Weber

E. U.

(2006). Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 709–730. doi:10.1037/a0014983

17.

Gershman

S. J.

(2017). Deconstructing the human algorithms for exploration. Cognition, 173, 34–42. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.014

18.

Gopnik

O’Grady

Lucas

C. G.

Griffiths

T. L.

Wente

Bridgers

. . . Dahl

R. E.

(2017). Changes in cognitive flexibility and hypothesis search across human life history from childhood to adolescence to adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114, 7892–7899. doi:10.1073/pnas.1700811114

19.

Hardin

M. G.

Mandell

Mueller

S. C.

Dahl

R. E.

Pine

D. S.

Ernst

(2009). Inhibitory control in anxious and healthy adolescents is modulated by incentive and incidental affective stimuli. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 1550–1558. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02121.x

20.

Huys

Q. J. M.

Eshel

O’Nions

Sheridan

Dayan

Roiser

J. P.

(2012). Bonsai trees in your head: How the Pavlovian system sculpts goal-directed choices by pruning decision trees. PLOS Computational Biology, 8(3), Article e1002410. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002410

21.

Inzlicht

Schmeichel

B. J.

Macrae

C. N.

(2014). Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 127–133. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.009

22.

Kayser

A. S.

Macks

Dahl

R. E.

Frank

M. J.

(2016). A neural correlate of strategic exploration at the onset of adolescence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29, 199–209. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00896

23.

Lejuez

C. W.

Aklin

W. M.

Zvolensky

M. J.

Pedulla

C. M.

(2003). Evaluation of the balloon analogue risk task (BART) as a predictor of adolescent real-world risk-taking behaviours. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 475–479. doi:10.1016/S0140-1971(03)00036-8

24.

Maslowsky

Owotomo

Huntley

E. D.

Keating

(2019). Adolescent risk behavior: Differentiating reasoned and reactive risk-taking. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48, 243–255. doi:10.1007/s10964-018-0978-3

25.

Nussenbaum

Cohen

A. O.

Davis

Halpern

Gureckis

Hartley

(2019). Causal information-seeking strategies change across childhood and adolescence. PsyArXiv Preprints. doi:10.31234/OSF.IO/QUKAC

26.

Pfeifer

J. H.

Allen

N. B.

(2012). Arrested development? Reconsidering dual-systems models of brain function in adolescence and disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 322–329. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.011

27.

Pfeifer

J. H.

Allen

N. B.

(2015). The audacity of specificity: Moving adolescent developmental neuroscience towards more powerful scientific paradigms and translatable models. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 131–138. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.012

28.

Pfeifer

J. H.

Berkman

E. T.

(2018). The development of self and identity in adolescence: Neural evidence and implications for a value-based choice perspective on motivated behavior. Child Development Perspectives, 12, 158–164. doi:10.1111/cdep.12279

29.

Shenhav

(2017). The perils of losing control: Why self-control is not just another value-based decision. Psychological Inquiry, 28, 148–152. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2017.1337407

30.

Shenhav

Botvinick

M. M.

Cohen

J. D.

(2013). The expected value of control: An integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron, 79, 217–240. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.007

31.

Shenhav

Musslick

Lieder

Kool

Griffiths

T. L.

Cohen

J. D.

Botvinick

M. M.

(2017). Toward a rational and mechanistic account of mental effort. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 40, 99–124. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116

32.

Somerville

L. H.

Sasse

S. F.

Garrad

M. C.

Drysdale

A. T.

Abi Akar

Insel

Wilson

R. C.

(2017). Charting the expansion of strategic exploratory behavior during adolescence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 155–164. doi:10.1037/xge0000250

33.

Steinberg

Albert

Cauffman

Banich

Graham

Woolard

(2008). Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: Evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1764–1778. doi:10.1037/a0012955

34.

Strang

N. M.

Chein

J. M.

Steinberg

(2013). The value of the dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 223. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00223

35.

Telzer

E. H.

(2016). Dopaminergic reward sensitivity can promote adolescent health: A new perspective on the mechanism of ventral striatum activation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 57–67. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.10.010

36.

Teslovich

Mulder

Franklin

N. T.

Ruberry

E. J.

Millner

Somerville

L. H.

. . . Casey

B. J.

(2014). Adolescents let sufficient evidence accumulate before making a decision when large incentives are at stake. Developmental Science, 17(1), 59–70. doi:10.1111/desc.12092

37.

Tymula

Rosenberg Belmaker

L. A.

Roy

A. K.

Ruderman

Manson

Glimcher

P. W.

Levy

(2012). Adolescents’ risk-taking behavior is driven by tolerance to ambiguity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 17135–17140. doi:10.1073/pnas.1207144109