New technologies create and archive digital traces—records of people’s behavior—that can supplement and enrich psychological research. Digital traces offer psychological-science researchers novel, large-scale data (which reflect people’s actual behaviors), rapidly collected and analyzed by new tools. We promote the integration of digital-traces data into psychological science, suggesting that it can enrich and overcome limitations of current research. In this article, we review helpful data sources, tools, and resources and discuss challenges associated with using digital traces in psychological research. Our review positions digital-traces research as complementary to traditional psychological-research methods and as offering the potential to enrich insights on human psychology.
AltmanD.AshtarS.OlivaresM.Yom-TovG. B. (2019). Do customer emotions affect worker speed? An empirical study of emotional load in online customer contact centers. Manuscript submitted for publication.
2.
AlvarezR. M. (Ed.). (2016). Computational social science: Discovery and prediction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AshtarS.Yom-TovG. B.RafaeliA. (2018). Demands and resources in the work of customer service agents: Predicting the length of unscheduled microbreaks (Technical Report). Haifa, Israel: Technion – Israel Institute of Technology.
4.
BanksG. C.WoznyjH. M.WesslenR. S.RossR. L. (2018). A review of best practice recommendations for text analysis in R (and a user-friendly app). Journal of Business and Psychology, 33, 445–459.
BraunM. T.KuljaninG.DeShonR. P. (2018). Special considerations for the acquisition and wrangling of big data. Organizational Research Methods, 21, 633–659.
7.
CambriaE.DasD.BandyopadhyayS.FeracoA. (Eds.). (2017). A practical guide to sentiment analysis (Vol. 5). London, England: Springer.
GreengardS. (2015). The Internet of things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
HarariG. M.LaneN. D.WangR.CrosierB. S.CampbellA. T.GoslingS. D. (2016). Using smartphones to collect behavioral data in psychological science: Opportunities, practical considerations, and challenges. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 838–854.
11.
HareliS.RafaeliA. (2008). Emotion cycles: On the social influence of emotion in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 35–59.
12.
HarlowL. L.OswaldF. L. (Eds.). (2016). Big data in psychology [Special issue]. Psychological Methods, 21(4), 447–651.
13.
HerzigJ.FeigenblatG.Shmueli-ScheuerM.KonopnickiD.RafaeliA.AltmanD.SpivakD. (2016). Classifying emotions in customer support dialogues in social media. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 64–73). Retrieved from http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W16-3609
14.
HindsJ.JoinsonA. (2019). Human and computer personality prediction from digital footprints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 204–211.
15.
JonesN. M.WojcikS. P.SweetingJ.SilverR. C. (2016). Tweeting negative emotion: An investigation of Twitter data in the aftermath of violence on college campuses. Psychological Methods, 21, 526–541.
16.
KosinskiM.MatzS. C.GoslingS. D.PopovV.StillwellD. (2015). Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences. American Psychologist, 70, 543–556.
17.
KramerA. D. I.GuilloryJ. E.HancockJ. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 8788–8790.
18.
LakensD. (2013). Using a smartphone to measure heart rate changes during relived happiness and anger. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 4, 238–241.
19.
LandersR. N.BrussoR. C.CavanaughK. J.CollmusA. B. (2016). A primer on theory-driven web scraping: Automatic extraction of big data from the Internet for use in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 21, 475–492.
20.
LathiaN.SandstromG. M.MascoloC.RentfrowP. J. (2017). Happier people live more active lives: Using smartphones to link happiness and physical activity. PLOS ONE, 12(1), Article e0160589. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160589
21.
LazerD.PentlandA.AdamicL.AralS.BarabasiA. L.BrewerD.Van AlstyneM. (2009). Computational social science. Science, 323, 721–723.
22.
MatusikJ. G.HeidlR.HollenbeckJ. R.YuA.LeeH. W.HoweM. (2019). Wearable Bluetooth sensors for capturing relational variables and temporal variability in relationships: A construct validation study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104, 357–387.
23.
MohrD. C.ZhangM.SchuellerS. M. (2017). Personal sensing: Understanding mental health using ubiquitous sensors and machine learning. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13, 23–47.
24.
MurphyS. C. (2017). A hands-on guide to conducting psychological research on Twitter. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 8, 396–412.
25.
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, 943. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716
RafaeliA.ErezA.RavidS.Derfler-RozinR.Efrat-TreisterD.ScheyerR. (2012). When customers exhibit verbal aggression, employees pay cognitive costs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 931–950.
28.
ReytJ.WiesenfeldB. M.TropeY. (2016). Big picture is better: The social implications of construal level for advice taking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 135, 22–31.
29.
RuthsD.PfefferJ. (2014). Social media for large studies of behavior. Science, 346, 1063–1064.
30.
SalganikM. J. (2018). Bit by bit: Social research in the digital age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
SalgeC. A. D. L.KarahannaE. (2018). Protesting corruption on Twitter: Is it a bot or is it a person?Academy of Management Discoveries, 4, 32–49.
32.
SettanniM.MarengoD. (2015). Sharing feelings online: Studying emotional well-being via automated text analysis of Facebook posts. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1045. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01045
33.
ShortJ. C.McKennyA. F.ReidS. W. (2018). More than words? Computer-aided text analysis in organizational behavior and psychology research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 415–435.
34.
SpeerA. B. (2018). Quantifying with words: An investigation of the validity of narrative-derived performance scores. Personnel Psychology, 71, 299–333.
Stephens-DavidowitzS.PinkerS. (2017). Everybody lies: Big data, new data, and what the Internet can tell us about who we really are. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
37.
ThelwallM. (2017). Heart and soul: Sentiment strength detection in the social web with SentiStrength. In HolystJ. (Ed.), Cyberemotions: Collective emotions in cyberspace (pp. 119–134). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
38.
VermaI. M. (2014). Editorial expression of concern and correction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 10779.
39.
Yom-TovE.Fernandez-LuqueL.WeberI.CrainS. P. (2012). Pro-anorexia and pro-recovery photo sharing: A tale of two warring tribes. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(6), Article e151. doi:10.2196/jmir.2239
40.
Yom-TovG. B.AshtarS.AltmanD.NatapovM.BarkayN.WestphalM.RafaeliA. (2018). Customer sentiment in web-based service interactions: Automated analyses and new insights (pp. 1689–1697). In WWW ’18 Companion Proceedings of The Web Conference2018. Lyon, France: International World Wide Web Conference Committee.
