The Psychology of Proenvironmental Support: In Search of Global Solutions for a Global Problem

Abstract

We review research that provides a sociocultural perspective on proenvironmental support. Despite the increasing volume of psychological research on proenvironmental action, there has been a relative dearth of consideration of sociocultural contexts, which poses critical theoretical and practical limitations to understanding and fostering proenvironmental actions across diverse populations. The sociocultural perspective posits that the primary motives driving action are context dependent. Building on this perspective, our research examines significant divergence in key determinants of proenvironmental support, focusing on several sociocultural variables, including national culture (individualism-collectivism), socioeconomic status, and religion. This program of research shows that personal environmental beliefs more directly lead to proenvironmental support in sociocultural contexts that prioritize personal motives over social motives. In contrast, in contexts that prioritize social motives, social influence becomes a more important predictor of proenvironmental support. Solving environmental challenges requires leveraging psychological diversity to motivate people across the globe.

Keywords

environmental behavior culture socioeconomic status religion environmental belief

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrahamse

Steg

Vlek

Rothengatter

(2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273–291. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002

Carus

(1997). The gospel of Buddha (18th ed.). Chicago, IL: Open Court.

Chuang

R. Y.

Eom

Kim

H. S.

(2019). Religion, social connectedness, and xenophobic responses to Ebola. Manuscript in preparation.

Clayton

Devine-Wright

Swim

Bonnes

Steg

Whitmarsh

Carrico

(2016). Expanding the role for psychology in addressing environmental challenges. American Psychologist, 71, 199–215. doi:10.1037/a0039482

Cohen

A. B.

(2009). Many forms of culture. American Psychologist, 64, 194–204. doi:10.1037/a0015308

Cohen

A. B.

(2015). Religion’s profound influences on psychology: Morality, intergroup relations, self-construal, and enculturation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 77–82. doi:10.1177/0963721414553265

Cohen

Kitayama

(2019). Handbook of cultural psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Eom

Kim

H. S.

Sherman

D. K.

(2018). Social class, control, and action: Socioeconomic status differences in antecedents of support for pro-environmental action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 60–75. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.009

Eom

Kim

H. S.

Sherman

D. K.

Ishii

(2016). Cultural variability in the link between environmental concern and support for environmental action. Psychological Science, 27, 1331–1339. doi:10.1177/0956797616660078

10.

Eom

Saad

C. S.

Kim

H. S.

(2019). Religiosity moderates the link between environmental awareness and support for pro-environmental action: The role of belief in a controlling god. Manuscript in preparation.

11.

Gifford

(2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66, 290–302. doi:10.1037/a0023566

12.

Gifford

(2014). Environmental psychology matters. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 541–579. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115048

13.

Graham

Haidt

(2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140–150. doi:10.1177/1088868309353415

14.

Howe

P. D.

Mildenberger

Marlon

J. R.

Leiserowitz

(2015). Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA. Nature Climate Change, 5, 596–603. doi:10.1038/nclimate2583

15.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/report/sr15/

16.

ISSP Research Group. (2019). International Social Survey Programme: Environment III - ISSP 2010 (ZA5500 Version 3.0.0) [Data file]. Cologne, Germany: GESIS Data Archive. doi:10.4232/1.13271

17.

Kay

A. C.

Whitson

J. A.

Gaucher

Galinsky

A. D.

(2009). Compensatory control: Achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 264–268. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01649.x

18.

Kim

H. S.

Lawrie

S. I.

(2019). Culture and motivation. In Cohen

Kitayama

(Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (2nd ed., pp. 268–291). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

19.

Kim

H. S.

Markus

H. R.

(1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 785–800. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785

20.

Kim

H. S.

Sherman

D. K.

(2007). “Express yourself”: Culture and the effect of self-expression on choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1–11. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.1

21.

Kim

H. S.

Sherman

D. K.

Updegraff

J. A.

(2016). Fear of Ebola: The influence of collectivism on xenophobic threat responses. Psychological Science, 27, 935–944. doi:10.1177/095679761664259

22.

Kraus

M. W.

Stephens

N. M.

(2012). A road map for an emerging psychology of social class. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 642–656. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00453.x

23.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

(2003). Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action. In Berman

V. M.

Berman

J. J.

(Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self (Vol. 49, pp. 1–58). Lincoln: University of Nebraska.

24.

Milfont

T. L.

Schultz

P. W.

(2016). Culture and the natural environment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 194–199. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.009

25.

Morling

Kitayama

Miyamoto

(2002). Cultural practices emphasize influence in the United States and adjustment in Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 311–323. doi:10.1177/0146167202286003

26.

McDonough

I. M.

Chan

M. Y.

Park

D. C.

(2016). Social-class differences in consumer choices: Working-class individuals are more sensitive to choices of others than middle-class individuals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 430–443. doi:10.1177/0146167216634043

27.

Norenzayan

Shariff

A. F.

(2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322, 58–62. doi:10.1126/science.1158757

28.

Pearson

A. R.

Schuldt

J. P.

Romero-Canyas

(2016). Social climate science: A new vista for psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 632–650. doi:10.1177/1745691616639726

29.

Riemer

Shavitt

Koo

Markus

H. R.

(2014). Preferences don’t have to be personal: Expanding attitude theorizing with a cross-cultural perspective. Psychological Review, 121, 619–648. doi:10.1037/a0037666

30.

Sasaki

J. Y.

Kim

H. S.

(2011). At the intersection of culture and religion: A cultural analysis of religion’s implications for secondary control and social affiliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 401–414. doi:10.1037/a0021849

31.

Schultz

P. W.

Nolan

J. M.

Cialdini

R. B.

Goldstein

N. J.

Griskevicius

(2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429–434. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x

32.

Sherkat

D. E.

Ellison

C. G.

(2007). Structuring the religion-environment connection: Identifying religious influences on environmental concern and activism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46, 71–85. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00341.x

33.

Snibbe

A. C.

Markus

H. R.

(2005). You can’t always get what you want: Educational attainment, agency, and choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 703–720. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.703

34.

Stephens

N. M.

Markus

H. R.

Townsend

S. S. M.

(2007). Choice as an act of meaning: The case of social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 814–830. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.814

35.

Stern

P. C.

(2011). Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. American Psychologist, 66, 303–314. doi:10.1037/a0023235

36.

Tam

K.-P.

Chan

H.-W.

(2017). Environmental concern has a weaker association with pro-environmental behavior in some societies than others: A cross-cultural psychology perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 213–223. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.09.001

37.

Triandis

H. C.

Bontempo

Villareal

M. J.

Asai

Lucca

(1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323–338. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.323

38.

Van Boven

Ehret

P. J.

Sherman

D. K

. (2018). Psychological barriers to bipartisan public support for climate policy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 492–507. doi:10.1177/1745691617748966

39.

Wardekker

J. A.

Petersen

A. C.

van der Sluijs

J. P.

(2009). Ethics and public perception of climate change: Exploring the Christian voices in the US public debate. Global Environmental Change, 19, 512–521. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.07.008

40.

Wike

(2016). What the world thinks about climate change in 7 charts. Retrieved from Pew Research Center: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/04/18/what-the-world-thinks-about-climate-change-in-7-charts/