Memories for events require adopting a particular visual perspective—viewing the past from our own eyes or from an observerlike perspective in which we see ourselves in the memory. The current review synthesizes new behavioral and functional-neuroimaging evidence on the role of visual perspective in reshaping memories and how shifting visual perspective to novel viewpoints relies on similar constructive processes during imagination. Directions for future research are also discussed.
AhmedS.IrishM.LoaneC.BakerI.HusainM.ThompsonS.. . . ButlerC. (2018). Association between precuneus volume and autobiographical memory impairment in posterior cortical atrophy: Beyond the visual syndrome. NeuroImage: Clinical, 18, 822–834.
2.
AkhtarS.JusticeL. V.LovedayC.ConwayM. A. (2017). Switching memory perspective. Consciousness and Cognition, 56, 50–57.
3.
BagriG.JonesG. V. (2009). Category-specific enhancement of retrieval due to field perspective. Memory, 17, 337–345.
4.
BenoitR. G.SchacterD. L. (2015). Specifying the core network supporting episodic simulation and episodic memory by activation likelihood estimation. Neuropsychologia, 75, 450–457.
5.
BergouignanL.NybergL.EhrssonH. H. (2014). Out-of-body-induced hippocampal amnesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 4421–4426.
BonniciH. M.ChekeL. G.GreenD. A. E.FitzGeraldT. H. M. B.SimonsJ. S. (2018). Specifying a causal role for angular gyrus in autobiographical memory. The Journal of Neuroscience, 38, 10438–10443.
8.
BuehlerR.GriffinD.LamK. C. H.DeslauriersJ. (2012). Perspectives on prediction: Does third-person imagery improve task completion estimates?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 138–149.
9.
ButlerA. C.RiceH. J.WooldridgeC. L.RubinD. C. (2016). Visual imagery in autobiographical memory: The role of repeated retrieval in shifting perspective. Consciousness and Cognition, 42, 237–253.
10.
ByrneP.BeckerS.BurgessN. (2007). Remembering the past and imagining the future: A neural model of spatial memory and imagery. Psychological Review, 114, 340–375.
11.
CavannaA. E.TrimbleM. R. (2006). The precuneus: A review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain, 129, 564–583.
12.
ChristianB. M.MilesL. K.ParkinsonC.MacraeC. N. (2013). Visual perspective and the characteristics of mind wandering. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 699. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00699
13.
CiaramelliE.RosenbaumR. S.SolczS.LevineB.MoscovitchM. (2010). Mental space travel: Damage to posterior parietal cortex prevents egocentric navigation and reexperiencing of remote spatial memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 36, 619–634.
14.
D’ArgembeauA.Van der LindenM. (2004). Phenomenal characteristics associated with projecting oneself back into the past and forward into the future: Influence of valence and temporal distance. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 844–858.
15.
De BrigardF.GiovanelloK. S. (2012). Influence of outcome valence in the subjective experience of episodic past, future, and counterfactual thinking. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1085–1096.
16.
EichE.NelsonA. L.LeghariM. A.HandyT. C. (2009). Neural systems mediating field and observer memories. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2239–2251.
17.
FretonM.LemogneC.BergouignanL.DelaveauP.LehericyS.FossatiP. (2014). The eye of the self: Precuneus volume and visual perspective during autobiographical memory retrieval. Brain Structure and Function, 219, 959–968.
18.
GrolM.VingerhoetsG.De RaedtR. (2017). Mental imagery of positive and neutral memories: A fMRI study comparing field perspective imagery to observer perspective imagery. Brain and Cognition, 111, 13–24.
19.
GuterstamA.BjornsdotterM.GentileG.EhrssonH. H. (2015). Posterior cingulate cortex integrates the senses of self-location and body ownership. Current Biology, 25, 1416–1425.
20.
HamiltonJ.ColeS. N. (2017). Imagining possible selves across time: Characteristics of self-images and episodic thoughts. Consciousness and Cognition, 52, 9–20.
21.
HebscherM.LevineB.GilboaA. (2018). The precuneus and hippocampus contribute to individual differences in the unfolding of spatial representations during episodic autobiographical memory. Neuropsychologia, 110, 123–133.
22.
LibbyL. K.EibachR. P. (2011). Visual perspective in mental imagery: A representation tool that functions in judgment, emotion, and self-insight. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 185–245). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23.
MacraeC. N.MitchellJ. P.TaitK. A.McNamaraD. L.GolubickisM.TopalidisP. P.ChristianB. M. (2015). Turning I into me: Imagining your future self. Consciousness and Cognition, 37, 207–213.
24.
MarcottiP.St. JacquesP. L. (2018). Shifting visual perspective during memory retrieval reduces the accuracy of subsequent memories. Memory, 26, 330–341.
25.
McCarrollC. J. (2017). Looking the past in the eye: Distortion in memory and the costs and benefits of recalling from an observer perspective. Consciousness and Cognition, 49, 322–332.
26.
McDermottK. B.WooldridgeC. L.RiceH. J.BergJ. J.SzpunarK. K. (2016). Visual perspective in remembering and episodic future thought. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 243–253.
27.
NigroG.NeisserU. (1983). Point of view in personal memories. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 467–482.
28.
PrebbleS. C.AddisD. R.TippettL. J. (2013). Autobiographical memory and sense of self. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 815–840.
29.
RadvanskyG.SvobC. (2019). Observer memories may not be for everyone. Memory27, 647–659. doi:10.1080/09658211.2018.1550093
30.
RathboneC. J.ConwayM. A.MoulinC. J. A. (2011). Remembering and imagining: The role of the self. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1175–1182.
31.
RennieL. J.HarrisP. R.WebbT. L. (2016). Visualizing actions from a third-person perspective: Effects on health behavior and the moderating role of behavior difficulty. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46, 724–731.
32.
RiceH. J. (2010). Seeing where we’re at: A review of visual perspective and memory retrieval. In MaceJ. H. (Ed.), The act of remembering: Toward an understanding of how we recall the past (pp. 228–258). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
33.
RichterF. R.CooperR. A.BaysP. M.SimonsJ. S. (2016). Distinct neural mechanisms underlie the success, precision, and vividness of episodic memory. eLife, 5, Article e18260. doi:10.7554/eLife.18260
34.
RubinD. C.UmanathS. (2015). Event memory: A theory of memory for laboratory, autobiographical, and fictional events. Psychological Review, 122, 1–23.
35.
SchacterD. L.GuerinS. A.St. JacquesP. L. (2011). Memory distortion: An adaptive perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 467–474.
36.
SekiguchiT.NonakaS. (2014). The long-term effect of perspective change on the emotional intensity of autobiographical memories. Cognition & Emotion, 28, 375–383.
37.
St. JacquesP. L.CarpenterA. C.SzpunarK. K.SchacterD. L. (2018). Remembering and imagining alternative versions of the personal past. Neuropsychologia, 110, 170–179.
38.
St. JacquesP. L.SchacterD. L. (2013). Modifying memory: Selectively enhancing and updating personal memories for a museum tour by reactivating them. Psychological Science, 24, 537–543.
39.
St. JacquesP. L.SzpunarK. K.SchacterD. L. (2017). Shifting visual perspective during retrieval shapes autobiographical memories. NeuroImage, 148, 103–114.
40.
SutinA. R.RobinsR. W. (2008). When the “I” looks at the “me”: Autobiographical memory, visual perspective, and the self. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 1386–1397.
41.
VerhaeghenP.AikmanS. N.Doyle-PortilloS.BellC. R.SimmonsN. (2018). When I saw me standing there: First-person and third-person memories and future projections, and how they relate to the self. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30, 438–452.
