A common claim is that people have an easier time accepting information than rejecting it, resulting in gullibility. In this article, I review empirical research demonstrating how the human mind is equipped with successful and spontaneous rejection processes that may protect us from disinformation.
BeggI. M.AnasA.FarinacciS. (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 446–458.
2.
ChiuY. C.EgnerT. (2015). Inhibition-induced forgetting: When more control leads to less memory. Psychological Science, 26, 27–38.
3.
DeutschR.GawronskiB.StrackF. (2006). At the boundaries of automaticity: Negation as reflective operation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 385–405.
4.
EricksonT. D.MattsonM. E. (1981). From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Memory and Language, 20, 540–551.
5.
FiedlerK.WaltherE.ArmbrusterT.FayD.NaumannU. (1996). Do you really know what you have seen? Intrusion errors and presupposition effects on constructive memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 484–511.
6.
GerrigR. J.PrenticeD. A. (1991). The representation of fictional information. Psychological Science, 2, 336–340.
7.
GilbertD. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107–119.
8.
GilbertD. T.KrullD. S.MaloneP. S. (1990). Unbelieving the unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 601–613.
9.
GilbertD. T.PelhamB. W.KrullD. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733–740.
10.
GilbertD. T.TafarodiR. W.MaloneP. S. (1993). You can’t not believe everything you read. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 221–233.
11.
HorneZ.PowellD.HummelJ. E.HolyoakK. J. (2015). Countering antivaccination attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112, 10321–10324.
12.
IsbernerM.-B.RichterT. (2013). Can readers ignore implausibility? Evidence for nonstrategic monitoring of event-based plausibility in language comprehension. Acta Psychologica, 142, 15–22.
13.
IsbernerM.-B.RichterT. (2014). Comprehension and validation: Separable stages of information processing?A case for epistemic monitoring in language comprehension. In RappD. N.BraaschJ. L. G. (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 245–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
KlaymanJ.HaY.-W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211–228.
15.
KleimanT.SherN.ElsterA.MayoR. (2015). Accessibility is a matter of trust: Dispositional and contextual distrust blocks accessibility effects. Cognition, 142, 333–344.
16.
LeeD. S.KimE.SchwarzN. (2015). Something smells fishy: Olfactory suspicion cues improve performance on the Moses illusion and Wason rule discovery task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 47–50.
17.
LoftusE. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12, 361–366.
18.
MayoR.AlfasiD.SchwarzN. (2014). Distrust and the positive test heuristic: Dispositional and situated social distrust improves performance on the Wason rule discovery task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 985–990.
19.
MayoR.SchulY.BurnsteinE. (2004). “I am not guilty” vs “I am innocent”: Successful negation may depend on the schema used for its encoding. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 433–449.
20.
OrenesI.BeltránD.SantamaríaC. (2014). How negation is understood: Evidence from the visual world paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 74, 36–45.
21.
OswaldM. E.GrosjeanS. (2004). Confirmation bias. In PohlR. F. (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgment, and memory (pp. 79–96). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
22.
RappD. N. (2016). The consequences of reading inaccurate information. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 281–285.
23.
RappD. N.HinzeS. R.SlatenD. G.HortonW. S. (2014). Amazing stories: Acquiring and avoiding inaccurate information from fiction. Discourse Processes, 51, 50–74.
24.
RichterT.SchroederS.WöhrmannB. (2009). You don’t have to believe everything you read: Background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 538–558.
25.
SchroederS.RichterT.HoeverI. (2008). Getting a picture that is both accurate and stable: Situation models and epistemic validation. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 237–259.
26.
SchulY.MayoR.BurnsteinE. (2004). Encoding under trust and distrust: The spontaneous activation of incongruent cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 668–679.
27.
SingerM. (2006). Verification of text ideas during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 574–591.
28.
SnyderM.SwannW. B. (1978). Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1202–1212.
29.
TettamantiM.ManentiR.Della RosaP. A.FaliniA.PeraniD.CappaS. F.MoroA. (2008). Negation in the brain: Modulating action representations. NeuroImage, 43, 358–367.
30.
VandebergL.EerlandA.ZwaanR. A. (2012). Out of mind, out of sight: Language affects perceptual vividness in memory. PLOS ONE, 7(4), Article e36154. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036154
31.
WasonP. C. (1960). On the failure-to-eliminate hypothesis in a conceptual task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129–140.
32.
WasonP. C.Johnson-LairdP. N. (1972). Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content (Vol. 86). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
YamagishiT.YamagishiM. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129–166.
