A recent surge in research on automatic processes in close relationships has revealed new insights into how people form and update relationship evaluations as well as the implications of these evaluations for their relationship outcomes. We begin by summarizing this research within the framework of interdependence theory—the predominant theory of how people evaluate and make decisions about their close relationships. In doing so, we review evidence that implicitly assessed automatic partner attitudes reflect pleasant and unpleasant experiences involving the partner and predict subsequent relationship outcomes, sometimes better than more deliberative judgments. Next, we describe several dual-process perspectives that suggest how and when these attitudes shape such outcomes, and we conclude by highlighting the potential benefits of examining automatic partner attitudes for theories of relationship science and beyond.
AmatoP. R.JamesS. (2010). Divorce in Europe and the United States: Commonalities and differences across nations. Family Science, 1, 2–13.
2.
BanseR.ImhoffR.SteffensM.SchrammN.RöschA.RobertsM.StangierU. (2013). Partner-AMP and well-being: Evidence for an implicit secure base script?Personal Relationships, 20, 140–154.
3.
BarghJ. A.ChartrandT. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.
4.
BradburyT. N.FinchamF. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3–33.
5.
BuckA. A.NeffL. A. (2012). Stress spillover in early marriage: The role of self-regulatory depletion. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 698–708.
6.
ConeJ.MannT. C.FergusonM. J. (2017). Changing our implicit minds: How, when, and why implicit evaluations can be rapidly revised. In OlsonJ. M. (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 56, pp. 131–199). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7.
FaureR.RighettiF.SeibelM.HofmannW. (2018). Speech is silver, nonverbal behavior is gold: How implicit partner evaluations affect dyadic interactions in close relationships. Psychological Science, 29, 1731–1741.
8.
FazioR. H. (2007). Attitudes as object–evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25, 603–637.
9.
FazioR. H.OlsonM. A. (2014). The MODE model: Attitude–behavior processes. In ShermanJ. W.GawronskiB.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 155–171). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
FazioR. H.Roskos-EwoldsenD. R.PowellM. C. (1994). Attitudes, perception, and attention. In NiedenthalP. M.KitayamaS. (Eds.), The heart’s eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 197–216). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11.
FazioR. H.SanbonmatsuD. M.PowellM. C.KardesF. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238.
12.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731.
13.
GawronskiB.MorrisonM.PhillsC. E.GaldiS. (2017). Temporal stability of implicit and explicit measures: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 300–312.
14.
GawronskiB.StrackF. (2004). On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency: Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 535–542.
15.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.
16.
HicksL. L.McNultyJ. K.MeltzerA. L.OlsonM. A. (2016). Capturing the interpersonal implications of evolved preferences? Frequency of sex shapes automatic, but not explicit, partner evaluations. Psychological Science, 27, 836–847.
17.
HicksL. L.McNultyJ. K.MeltzerA. L.OlsonM. A. (2018). A dual-process perspective on how sexual experiences shape automatic versus explicit relationship satisfaction: Reply to Brody, Costa, Klapilová, and Weiss (2018). Psychological Science, 29, 670–672.
18.
JonesC. R.OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2010). Evaluative conditioning: The “how” question. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 43, pp. 205–255). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19.
KelleyH. H.ThibautJ. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
20.
LavnerJ. A.BradburyT. N. (2010). Patterns of change in marital satisfaction over the newlywed years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 1171–1187.
21.
LeBelE. P.CampbellL. (2013). The interactive role of implicit and explicit partner evaluations on ongoing affective and behavioral romantic realities. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 4, 167–174.
22.
LeeS.RoggeR. D.ReisH. T. (2010). Assessing the seeds of relationship decay: Using implicit evaluations to detect the early stages of disillusionment. Psychological Science, 21, 857–864.
23.
LuchiesL. B.WieselquistJ.RusbultC. E.KumashiroM.EastwickP. W.CoolsenM. K.FinkelE. J. (2013). Trust and biased memory of transgressions in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 673–694.
24.
MarangesH.McNultyJ. K. (2017). The rested relationship: Sleep benefits marital evaluations. Journal of Family Psychology, 31, 117–122.
25.
McNultyJ. K.BakerL. R.OlsonM. A. (2014). Implicit self-evaluations predict changes in implicit partner evaluations. Psychological Science, 25, 1649–1657.
26.
McNultyJ. K.MeltzerA. L.MakhanovaA.ManerJ. K. (2018). Attentional and evaluative biases help people maintain relationships by avoiding infidelity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115, 76–95.
27.
McNultyJ. K.OlsonM. A. (2015). Integrating automatic processes into theories of relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 107–112.
28.
McNultyJ. K.OlsonM. A.JonesR. E.AcostaL. M. (2017). Automatic associations between one’s partner and one’s affect as the proximal mechanism of change in relationship satisfaction: Evidence from evaluative conditioning. Psychological Science, 28, 1031–1040.
29.
McNultyJ. K.OlsonM. A.MeltzerA. L.ShafferM. J. (2013). Though they may be unaware, newlyweds implicitly know whether their marriage will be satisfying. Science, 342, 1119–1120.
30.
MurrayS. L. (1999). The quest for conviction: Motivated cognition in romantic relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 23–34.
31.
MurrayS. L.GomillionS.HolmesJ. G.HarrisB. (2015). Inhibiting self-protection in romantic relationships: Automatic partner attitudes as a resource for low self-esteem people. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 6, 173–182.
32.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.PinkusR. T. (2010). A smart unconscious? Procedural origins of automatic partner attitudes in marriage. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 650–656.
33.
MurrayS. L.PinkusR. T.HolmesJ. G.HarrisB.GomillionS.AloniM.. . . LederS. (2011). Signaling when (and when not) to be cautious and self-protective: Impulsive and reflective trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 485–502.
34.
MurrayS. L.SeeryM. D.LamarcheV. M.KondrakC. L.GomillionS. (2019). Implicitly imprinting the past on the present: Automatic partner attitudes and the transition to parenthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 69–100.
35.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2017). Acknowledging the elephant in the room: How stressful environmental contexts shape relationship dynamics. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 107–110.
36.
ProulxC. M.HelmsH. M.BuehlerC. (2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 576–593.
37.
RoblesT. F.SlatcherR. B.TrombelloJ. M.McGinnM. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 140–187.
38.
Roskos-EwoldsenD. R.FazioR. H. (1992). On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object’s attraction of visual attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 198–211.
39.
RydellR. J.McConnellA. R. (2006). Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 995–1008.
40.
ScintaA.GableS. L. (2007). Automatic and self-reported attitudes in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1008–1022.
41.
Towles-SchwenT.FazioR. H. (2006). Automatically activated racial attitudes as predictors of the success of interracial roommate relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 698–697.
42.
WilsonT. D.LindseyS.SchoolerT. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126.
43.
ZajoncR. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.
44.
ZayasV.ShodaY. (2015). Love you? Hate you? Maybe it’s both: Evidence that significant others trigger bivalent-priming. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 6, 56–64.
