For more than a century, the standard view in the field of human intelligence has been that there is a “general intelligence” that permeates all human cognitive activity. This general cognitive ability is supposed to explain the positive manifold, the finding that intelligence tests with different content all correlate. Yet there is a lack of consensus regarding the psychological or neural basis of such an ability. A recent account, process-overlap theory, explains the positive manifold without proposing general intelligence. As a consequence of the theory, IQ is redefined as an emergent formative construct rather than a reflective latent trait. This implies that IQ should be interpreted as an index of specific cognitive abilities rather than the reflection of an underlying general cognitive ability.
BaddeleyA. D. (1996). Exploring the central executive. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 49, 5–28. doi:10.1080/713755608
2.
BartholomewD. J.DearyI. J.LawnM. (2009). A new lease of life for Thomson’s bonds model of intelligence. Psychological Review, 116, 567–579. doi:10.1037/a0016262
3.
BlumD.HollingH. (2017). Spearman’s law of diminishing returns. A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 65, 60–66. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2017.07.004
4.
BorsboomD.MellenberghG. J.van HeerdenJ. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203–219.
5.
CattellR. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
6.
ConwayA. R. A.KaneM. J.EngleR. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 547–552. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.005
7.
ConwayA. R. A.GetzS. J.MacnamaraB.Engel de AbreuP. M. J. (2011). Working memory and intelligence. In SternbergR. J.KaufmanS. B. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 394–418). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
DuncanJ.ParrA.WoolgarA.ThompsonR.BrightP.CoxS.. . . Nimmo-SmithI. (2008). Goal neglect and Spearman’s g: Competing parts of a complex task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 131–148. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.131
10.
EngleR. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23.
11.
EngleR. W.TuholskiS. W.LaughlinJ. E.ConwayA. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.
12.
GrattonG.CooperP.FabianiM.CarterC. S.KarayanidisF. (2018). Dynamics of cognitive control: Theoretical bases, paradigms, and a view for the future. Psychophysiology, 55(3), Article e13016. doi:10.1111/psyp.13016
13.
GustafssonJ.-E. (1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities. Intelligence, 8, 179–203. doi:10.1016/0160-2896(84)90008-4
14.
HornJ. L. (1994). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human intelligence (pp. 443–451). New York, NY: MacMillan Reference Library.
15.
JensenA. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
16.
JohnsonW.BouchardT. J.Jr.KruegerR. F.McGueM.GottesmanI. I. (2004). Just one g: Consistent results from three test batteries. Intelligence, 32, 95–107. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(03)00062-X
17.
KanK.-J.KievitR. A.DolanC.van der MaasH. (2011). On the interpretation of the CHC factor Gc. Intelligence, 39, 292–302. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2011.05.003
18.
KanK.-J.van der MaasH. L. J.KievitR. A. (2016). Process overlap theory: Strengths, limitations, and challenges. Psychological Inquiry, 27, 220–228. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2016.1182000
19.
KaneM. J. (2005). Full frontal fluidity? Looking in on the neuroimaging of reasoning and intelligence. In WilhelmO.EngleR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence (pp. 141–165). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20.
KaneM. J.HambrickD. Z.TuholskiS. W.WilhelmO.PayneT. W.EngleR. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189
21.
KovacsK.ConwayA. R. A. (2016). Process overlap theory: A unified account of the general factor of intelligence. Psychological Inquiry, 27, 151–177. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2016.1153946
22.
KovacsK.MolenaarD.ConwayA. R. A. (2019). The domain generality of working memory capacity is moderated by ability. Manuscript submitted for publication.
23.
KrijnenW. P. (2004). Positive loadings and factor correlations from positive covariance matrices. Psychometrika, 69, 655–660. doi:10.1007/BF02289861
24.
MackintoshN. J. (2011). IQ and human intelligence. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
25.
MolenaarD.KőN.RózsaS.MészárosA. (2017). Differentiation of cognitive abilities in the WAIS-IV at the item level. Intelligence, 65, 48–59. doi:10.1016/J.INTELL.2017.10.004
26.
RammsayerT.TrocheS. (2016). Validity of the worst performance rule as a function of task complexity and psychometric g: On the crucial role of g saturation. Journal of Intelligence, 4(1), Article 5. doi:10.3390/jintelligence4010005
27.
ShipsteadZ.YonehiroJ. (2016). The domain-specific and domain-general relationships of visuospatial working memory to reasoning ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1504–1512. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1021-x
28.
SpearmanC. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–292. doi:10.2307/1412107
29.
StankovL. (2017). Overemphasized “g.”Journal of Intelligence, 5(4), Article 33. doi:10.3390/jintelligence5040033
30.
ThomsonG. H. (1916). A hierarchy without a general factor. British Journal of Psychology, 8, 271–281. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1916.tb00133.x
31.
van der MaasH. L. J.DolanC. V.GrasmanR. P. P. P.WichertsJ. M.HuizengaH. M.RaijmakersM. E. J. (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 113, 842–861. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.842
32.
van der MaasH. L. J.KanK.-J.BorsboomD. (2014). Intelligence is what the intelligence test measures. Seriously. Journal of Intelligence, 2, 12–15. doi:10.3390/jintelligence2010012
