Although the presence of social-support figures (e.g., close friends and family members) is known to increase feelings of safety, reduce threat responses, and improve health, the route by which these effects occur is not well understood. One explanation is that social-support figures are members of a powerful category of safety signals—prepared safety stimuli. Here, we review research demonstrating that social-support figures act as prepared safety stimuli and explore the impact that these unique safety stimuli have on fear-learning processes. According to recent work, the presence of social-support figures both reduces fear acquisition and enhances fear extinction, ultimately decreasing perceptions of threat. These findings shed light on the route by which social support buffers against threat and illustrate the unique properties of prepared safety stimuli and how they might be used to improve mental and physical health outcomes.
HennessyM.KaiserS.SachserN. (2009). Social buffering of the stress response: Diversity, mechanisms, and functions. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 30, 470–482. A review of social-buffering effects and the links between social-support processes and health.
2.
HermansD.CraskeM. G.MinekaS.LovibondP. F. (2006) Extinction in human fear conditioning. Biological Psychiatry, 60, 361–368. A review of current thought on fear extinction that includes discussion of fear-conditioning theory as well as the current state of research.
3.
HornsteinE. A.FanselowM. S.EisenbergerN. I. (2016). (See References). A report of experimental research that reviews the concept of prepared safety and presents findings from the first-ever studies demonstrating that social-support figures are prepared safety stimuli.
4.
OhmanA.MinekaS. (2001). (See References). A review of current thinking regarding prepared fear stimuli and their functions.
5.
RescorlaR. A. (1969). (See References). A report of experimental research that includes a definition and experimental investigation of the concept of conditioned inhibitors and the tests used to discern them.
6.
BoutonM. E. (2004). Context and behavioral processes in extinction. Learning & Memory, 11, 485–494.
7.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books
8.
CoanJ. A. (2008). Toward a neuroscience of attachment. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications (2nd ed., pp. 241–265). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9.
CookE. W.HodesR. L.LangP. J. (1986). Preparedness and phobia: Effects of stimulus content on human visceral conditioning. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 195–207.
10.
CraskeM. G. (1999). Anxiety disorders: Psychological approaches to theory and treatment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
11.
DavitzJ. R.MasonD. J. (1955). Socially facilitated reduction of a fear response in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 48, 149–151.
12.
EisenbergerN. I.MasterS. L.InagakiT. I.TaylorS. E.ShirinyanD.LiebermanM. D.NaliboffB. D. (2011). Attachment figures activate a safety signal-related neural region and reduce pain experience. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 11721–11726.
13.
EpleyS. W. (1974). Reduction of the behavioral effects of aversive stimulation by the presence of companions. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 271–283.
14.
FanselowM. S. (1981). Naloxone and Pavlovian fear conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 12, 398–419.
15.
GarciaJ.KoellingR. A. (1966). Relation of a cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychonomic Science, 4, 123–124.
16.
HarlowH. F.ZimmermannR. R. (1959). Affectional responses in the infant monkey. Science, 130, 421–432.
17.
HarrisonB. J.FullanaM. A.ViaE.Soriano-MasC.VervlietB.Martínez-ZalacaínI.. . . CardonerN. (2017). Human ventromedial prefrontal cortex and the positive affective processing of safety signals. NeuroImage, 152, 12–18.
18.
HennessyM.ZateR.MakenD. S. (2008). Social buffering of the cortisol response of adult female guinea pigs. Psychology and Behavior, 93, 883–888.
19.
HollandP. C. (1991). Transfer of control in ambiguous discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 231–248.
20.
HornsteinE. A.EisenbergerN. I. (2017). Unpacking the buffering effect of social support figures: Social support attenuates fear acquisition. PLOS ONE, 12(5), Article e0175891. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175891
21.
HornsteinE. A.FanselowM. S.EisenbergerN. I. (2016). A safe haven: Social-support figures as prepared safety stimuli. Psychological Science, 27, 1051–1060.
22.
HornsteinE. A.HaltomK. E. B.ShiroleK.EisenbergerN. I. (2017). A unique safety signal: Social-support figures enhance rather than protect from fear extinction. Clinical Psychological Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/2167702617743002
23.
HostinarC. E.SullivanR. M.GunnarM. R. (2014). Psychobiological mechanisms underlying the social buffering of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis: A review of animal models and human studies across development. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 256–282.
24.
InagakiT. K.EisenbergerN. I. (2013). Shared neural mechanisms underlying social warmth and physical warmth. Psychological Science, 24, 2272–2280.
25.
JacobsW. J.LoLardoV. M. (1977). The sensory basis of avoidance responding in the rat: Relative dominance of auditory or visual warning signals and safety signals. Learning and Motivation, 8, 448–466.
26.
KiyokawaY.TakeuchiY.MoriY. (2007). Two types of social buffering differentially mitigate conditioned fear responses. European Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 3606–3613.
27.
LovibondP. F.DavisN. R.O’FlahertyA. S. (2000). Protection from extinction in human conditioning. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 967–983.
28.
LovibondP. F.MitchellC. J.MinardE.BradyA.MenziesR. G. (2009). Safety behaviors preserve threat beliefs: Protection from extinction of human fear conditioning by an avoidance response. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 716–720.
29.
MasterS. L.EisenbergerN. I.TaylorS. E.NaliboffB. D.ShirinyanD.LiebermanM. D. (2009). A picture’s worth: Partner photographs reduce experimentally induced pain. Psychological Science, 20, 1316–1318.
30.
McNallyG. P.WestbrookF. (2003). Opioid receptors regulate the extinction of Pavlovian fear conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 117, 1292–1301.
31.
McNallyR. J. (2007). Mechanisms of exposure therapy: How neuroscience can improve psychological treatments for anxiety disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 750–759.
32.
NakayasuT.IshiiK. (2008). Effects of pair-housing after social defeat experience on elevated plus-maze behavior in rats. Behavioural Processes, 78, 477–480.
33.
NelsonE.PankseppJ. (1998). Brain substrates of infant-mother attachment: Contributions of opioids, oxytocin, and norepinephrine. Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews, 22, 437–452.
34.
OhmanA.MinekaS. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483–522.
35.
PhelpsE. A.DelgadoM. R.NearingK. I.LeDouxJ. E. (2004). Extinction learning in humans: Role of the amygdala and vmPFC. Neuron, 43, 897–905.
36.
RachmanS. (1989). The return of fear: Review and prospect. Clinical Psychology Review, 9, 147–168.
37.
RachmanS.RadomskyA.ShafranR. (2008). Safety behaviour: A reconsideration. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 163–173.
38.
RescorlaR. A. (1969). Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 77–94.
39.
RescorlaR. A. (1979). Conditioned inhibition and extinction. In DickinsonA.BoakesR. A. (Eds.), Mechanisms of learning and motivation: A memorial volume to Jerzy Konorski (pp. 83–110). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
40.
RescorlaR. A. (2003). Protection from extinction. Learning & Behavior, 31, 124–132.
41.
RescorlaR. A.WagnerA. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In BlackA. H.ProkasyW. F. (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
42.
SeligmanM. E. P. (1970). On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological Review, 77, 406–418.
43.
SeligmanM. E. P. (1971). Phobias and preparedness. Behavior Therapy, 2, 307–320.
44.
ThorsteinssonE. B.JamesJ. E. (1999) A meta-analysis of the effects of experimental manipulations of social support during laboratory stress. Psychology and Health, 14, 869–886.
