Dominance and prestige represent evolved strategies used to navigate social hierarchies. Dominance is a strategy through which people gain and maintain social rank by using coercion, intimidation, and power. Prestige is a strategy through which people gain and maintain social rank by displaying valued knowledge and skills and earning respect. The current article synthesizes recent lines of research documenting differences between dominance- versus prestige-oriented individuals, including personality traits and emotions, strategic behaviors deployed in social interactions, leadership strategies, and physiological correlates of both behaviors. The article also reviews effects that dominance versus prestige have on the functioning and well-being of social groups. The article also presents opportunities for future research and discusses links between dominance and prestige and the social psychological literature on power and status.
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.FoulshamT.KingstoneA.HenrichJ. (2013). (See References). A seminal empirical article demonstrating the use of dominance and prestige in newly formed groups.
2.
HenrichJ.Gil-WhiteF. J. (2001). (See References). An article that helped popularize the construct of prestige—and the distinction between prestige and dominance—in the evolutionary psychological literature.
3.
ManerJ. K.CaseC. R. (2016). (See References). A comprehensive review article detailing the recent literature on dominance and prestige.
4.
AndersonC.HildrethJ. A. D.HowlandL. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 574–601.
5.
AndersonC.KilduffG. J. (2009). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 491–503.
6.
AnicichE. M.FastN. J.HalevyN.GalinskyA. D. (2016). When the bases of social hierarchy collide: Power without status drives interpersonal conflict. Organization Science, 27, 123–140.
7.
BirdB. M.JofréV. S. C.GenioleS. N.WelkerK. M.ZilioloS.MaestripieriD.. . . CarréJ. M. (2016). Does the facial width-to-height ratio map onto variability in men’s testosterone concentrations?Evolution & Human Behavior, 37, 392–398.
8.
BladerS. L.ShirakoA.ChenY.-R. (2016). Looking out from the top: Differential effects of status and power on perspective taking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 723–737.
9.
CarréJ. M.McCormickC. M.MondlochC. J. (2009). Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior. Psychological Science, 20, 1194–1198.
10.
CaseC. R.ManerJ. K. (2014). Divide and conquer: When and why leaders undermine the cohesive fabric of their group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 1033–1050.
11.
CaseC. R.ManerJ. K. (2017). To lead or to be liked: When prestige-oriented leaders sacrifice group performance. Manuscript in preparation.
12.
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L. (2014). Toward a unified science of hierarchy: Dominance and prestige are two fundamental pathways to human social rank. In ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.AndersonC. (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 3–27). New York, NY: Springer.
13.
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.FoulshamT.KingstoneA.HenrichJ. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103–125.
14.
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.HenrichJ. (2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution & Human Behavior, 31, 334–347.
15.
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.HoS.HenrichJ. (2016). Listen, follow me: Dynamic vocal signals of dominance predict emergent social rank in humans.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 536–547.
16.
de WaalF. (1999). Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
17.
De Waal-AndrewsW.GreggA. P.LammersJ. (2015). When status is grabbed and when status is granted: Getting ahead in dominance and prestige hierarchies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 445–464.
18.
FastN. J.ChenS. (2009). When the boss feels inadequate: Power, incompetence, and aggression. Psychological Science, 20, 1406–1413.
19.
FastN. J.HalevyN.GalinskyA. D. (2012). The destructive nature of power without status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 391–394.
20.
HalevyN.ChouE. Y.ChoenT. R.LivingstonR. W. (2012). Status conferral in intergroup social dilemmas: Behavioral antecedents and consequences of prestige and dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 351–366.
21.
HaysN. A.BenderskyC. (2015). Not all inequality is created equal: Effects of status versus power hierarchies on competition for upward mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 867–882.
22.
HenrichJ.ChudekM.BoydR. (2015). The Big Man Mechanism: How prestige fosters cooperation and creates prosocial leaders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370, 20150013.
23.
HenrichJ.Gil-WhiteF. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution & Human Behavior, 22, 165–196.
24.
JohnsonR. T.BurkJ. A.KirkpatrickL. A. (2007). Dominance and prestige as differential predictors of aggression and testosterone levels in men. Evolution & Human Behavior, 28, 345–351.
25.
KeltnerD.GruenfeldD.AndersonC. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.
26.
LefevreC. E.LewisG. J.PerrettD. I.PenkeL. (2013). Telling facial metrics: Facial width is associated with testosterone levels in men. Evolution & Human Behavior, 34, 273–279.
27.
LiuC. H.YuanL.ChenC. S.YuG. L. (2016). Authentic and hubristic pride as assessed by self, friends, and strangers. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 7, 690–696.
28.
MageeJ.GalinskyA. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351–398.
29.
ManerJ. K.CaseC. R. (2016). Dominance and prestige: Dual strategies for navigating social hierarchies. In OlsonJ.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 54, pp. 129–180). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
30.
ManerJ. K.MeadN. (2010). The essential tension between leadership and power: When leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 482–497.
31.
MazurA.BoothA. (1998). Testosterone and social dominance in men. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 21, 353–397.
32.
MeadN. L.ManerJ. K. (2012a). On keeping your enemies close: Powerful leaders seek proximity to ingroup power-threats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 576–591.
33.
MeadN. L.ManerJ. K. (2012b). When me versus you becomes us versus them: How intergroup competition shapes ingroup psychology. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 566–574.
34.
MilevaV. R.CowanM. L.CobeyK. D.KnowlesK. K.LittleA. C. (2014). In the face of dominance: Self-perceived and other-perceived dominance are positively associated with facial-width-to-height ratio in men. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 115–118.
35.
NishidaT. (1983). Alpha status and agonistic alliance in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii). Primates, 24, 318–336.
36.
SemenyaS. W.HoneyP. L. (2015). Dominance styles mediate sex differences in dark triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 37–43.
37.
TiedensL. Z.FragaleA. R. (2003). Power moves: Complementarity in submissive and dominant nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 558–568.
38.
TracyJ. L.RobinsR. W. (2004). Show your pride: Evidence for a discrete emotion expression. Psychological Science, 15, 194–197.
39.
van der MeijL.SchavelingJ.Van VugtM. (2016). Basal testosterone, leadership and dominance: A field study and meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 72, 72–79.
40.
Van VugtM. (2006). Evolutionary origins of leadership and followership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 354–371.
41.
Van VugtM.GraboA. E. (2015). The many faces of leadership: An evolutionary-psychology approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 484–489.
42.
WeidmanA. C.ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L. (2016). The psychological structure of humility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/pspp0000112
43.
WilsonM.DalyM. (1985). Competitiveness, risk taking, and violence: The young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 59–73.
