Producing items by means as simple as saying, writing, or typing them can yield substantial memory improvements relative to silent reading. We review the research on this production effect and outline some important extensions and boundary conditions. We also evaluate the evidence that production enhances the distinctiveness of items in memory during encoding, thereby facilitating their later retrieval. There are issues to resolve and areas to explore, but production offers a practical means of enhancing some forms of long-term, explicit memory.
HuntR. R. (2013). (see References). Explores distinctiveness as a memory principle.
2.
ForrinN. D.GrootB.MacLeodC. M. (2016). (see References). Provides new methods and evidence regarding the benefits and costs of production.
3.
MacLeodC. M.GopieN.HourihanK. L.NearyK. R.OzubkoJ. D. (2010). (see References). The initial delineation (and naming) of the production effect.
4.
OzubkoJ. D.HourihanK. L.MacLeodC. M. (2012). (see References). Production effects over longer periods and for text materials.
5.
OzubkoJ. D.MajorJ.MacLeodC. M. (2014). (see References). Contrasts distinctiveness and strength accounts of the production effect.
6.
BeggI.SniderA. (1987). The generation effect: Evidence for generalized inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 553–563. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.553
7.
BodnerG. E.MacLeodC. M. (2016). The benefits of studying by production . . . and of studying production: Introduction to the special issue on the production effect in memory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 89–92. doi:10.1037/cep0000094
8.
BodnerG. E.TaikhA. (2012). Reassessing the basis of the production effect in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1711–1719. doi:10.1037/a0028466
9.
BodnerG. E.TaikhA.FawcettJ. M. (2014). Assessing the costs and benefits of production in recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 149–154. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0485-1
10.
CastelA. D.RhodesM. G.FriedmanM. C. (2013). Predicting memory benefits in the production effect: The use and misuse of self-generated distinctive cues when making judgments of learning. Memory & Cognition, 41, 28–35. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0249-6
11.
ConwayM. A.GathercoleS. E. (1987). Modality and long-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 341–361. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(87)90118-5
12.
ConwayM. A.GathercoleS. E. (1990). Writing and long-term memory: Evidence for a “translation” hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 42, 513–527. doi:10.1080/14640749008401235
13.
CraikF. I. M.LockhartR. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
14.
DodsonC. S.SchacterD. L. (2001). “If I had said it, I would have remembered it”: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 155–161. doi:10.3758/BF03196152
15.
FawcettJ. M. (2013). The production effect benefits performance in between-lists designs: A meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica, 142, 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.10.001
16.
FawcettJ. M.OzubkoJ. D. (2016). Familiarity, but not recollection, supports the between-lists production effect in recognition memory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 99–115. doi:10.1037/cep0000089
17.
FawcettJ. M.QuinlanC. K.TaylorT. L. (2012). Interplay of the production and picture superiority effects: A signal detection analysis. Memory, 20, 655–666. doi:10.1080/09658211.2012.693510
18.
ForrinN. D.GrootB.MacLeodC. M. (2016). The d-prime directive: Assessing costs and benefits in recognition by dissociating mixed-list false alarm rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1090–1111. doi:10.1037/xlm0000214
19.
ForrinN. D.JonkerT. R.MacLeodC. M. (2014). Production improves memory equivalently following elaborative vs. non-elaborative processing. Memory, 22, 509–524. doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.798417
20.
ForrinN. D.MacLeodC. M. (2016). Order information is used to guide recall of long lists: Further evidence for the item-order account. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 125–138. doi:10.1037/cep0000088
21.
ForrinN. D.MacLeodC. M.OzubkoJ. D. (2012). Widening the boundaries of the production effect. Memory & Cognition, 40, 1046–1055. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0210-8
22.
HopkinsR. H.EdwardsR. E. (1972). Pronunciation effects in recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 534–537. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80036-7
23.
HourihanK. L.SmithA. R. S. (2016). Production does not improve memory for face-name associations. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 147–153. doi:10.1037/cep0000091
24.
HuntR. R. (2006). The concept of distinctiveness in memory research. In HuntR. R.WorthenJ. B. (Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 3–25). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169669.003.0001
25.
HuntR. R. (2013). Precision in memory through distinctive processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 10–15. doi:10.1177/0963721412463228
26.
IchtM.MamaY.AlgomD. (2014). The production effect in memory: Multiple species of distinctiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 886. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00886
27.
JamiesonR. K.MewhortD. J. K.HockleyW. E. (2016). A computational account of the production effect: Still playing twenty questions with nature. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 154–164. doi:10.1037/cep0000081
28.
JamiesonR. K.SpearJ. (2014). The offline production effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 20–28. doi:10.1037/cep0000009
29.
JonesA. C.PycM. A. (2014). The production effect: Costs and benefits in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 300–305. doi:10.1037/a0033337
30.
JonkerT. R.LeveneM.MacLeodC. M. (2014). Testing the item-order account of design effects using the production effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 441–448. doi:10.1037/a0034977
31.
KnutsenD.Le BigotL. (2014). Capturing egocentric biases in reference reuse during collaborative dialogue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1590–1599. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0620-7
32.
LambertA. M.BodnerG. E.TaikhA. (2016). The production effect in long-list recall: In no particular order?Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 165–176. doi:10.1037/cep0000086
33.
LinO. Y. H.MacLeodC. M. (2012). Aging and the production effect: A test of the distinctiveness account. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 212–216. doi:10.1037/a0028309
34.
MacDonaldP. A.MacLeodC. M. (1998). The influence of attention at encoding on direct and indirect remembering. Acta Psychologica, 98, 291–310. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00047-4
35.
MacLeodC. M. (2011). I said, you said: The production effect gets personal. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1197–1202. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0168-8
36.
MacLeodC. M.GopieN.HourihanK. L.NearyK. R.OzubkoJ. D. (2010). The production effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 671–685. doi:10.1037/a0018785
37.
NairneJ. S.RieglerG. L.SerraM. (1991). Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 702–709. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.4.702
38.
OzubkoJ. D.HourihanK. L.MacLeodC. M. (2012). Production benefits learning: The production effect endures and improves memory for text. Memory, 20, 717–727. doi:10.1080/09658211.2012.699070
39.
OzubkoJ. D.MajorJ.MacLeodC. M. (2014). Remembered study mode: Support for the distinctiveness account of the production effect. Memory, 22, 470–480. doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.800554
40.
PilottiM.BergmanE. T.GalloD. A.SommersM.RoedigerH. L.III. (2000). Direct comparison of auditory implicit memory tests. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 347–353. doi:10.3758/BF03212992
41.
PutnamA. L.OzubkoJ. D.MacLeodC. M.RoedigerH. L. (2014). The production effect in paired-associate learning: Benefits for item and associative information. Memory & Cognition, 42, 409–420. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0374-x
42.
QuinlanC. K.TaylorT. L. (2013). Enhancing the production effect in memory. Memory, 21, 904–915. doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.766754
43.
RichlerJ. J.PalmeriT. J.GauthierI. (2013). How does using object names influence visual recognition memory?Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 10–25. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.09.001
44.
SlameckaN. J.GrafP. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592–604. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.592
45.
TaikhA.BodnerG. E. (2016). Evaluating the basis of the between-group production effect in recognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 186–194. doi:10.1037/cep0000083
