What we pay attention to is influenced by reward learning. Previously reward-associated stimuli are difficult to ignore, automatically drawing our attention even when we know they are no longer beneficial to us. Recent research has suggested that these value-dependent attentional biases affect more than just perception, biasing an individual to act in such a way as to pursue the attended stimulus. Here, I review this evidence and argue for a direct link between attentional biases and shifts in action-related priorities. Given this link, abnormal or otherwise inappropriate reward-related attentional biases are hypothesized to contribute to undesired habits and poor economic choices.
AndersonB. A. (2016a). The attention habit: How reward learning shapes attentional selection. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1369, 24–39. A comprehensive and up-to-date review of how reward learning influences attention.
2.
AndersonB. A. (2016b). What is abnormal about addiction-related attentional biases?Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 167, 8–14. A thorough and user-friendly review of the relationship between reward-related attention and addictive behaviors.
3.
AndersonB. A.FolkC. L.GarrisonR.RogersL. (2016). (See References). An unambiguous demonstration of how reward-related attention can influence response selection.
4.
ItthipuripatS.ChaK.RangsipatN.SerencesJ. T. (2015). (See References). An elegant demonstration of how distraction by reward-related stimuli impairs value-based decision making.
5.
AndersonB. A. (2016). Social reward shapes attentional biases. Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 30–36.
6.
AndersonB. A.FaulknerM. L.RileeJ. J.YantisS.MarvelC. L. (2013). Attentional bias for non-drug reward is magnified in addiction. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21, 499–506.
7.
AndersonB. A.FolkC. L. (2012). Contingent involuntary motoric inhibition: The involuntary inhibition of a motor response contingent on top-down goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1348–1352.
8.
AndersonB. A.FolkC. L. (2014). Conditional automaticity in response selection: Contingent involuntary response inhibition with varied stimulus-response mapping. Psychological Science, 25, 547–554.
9.
AndersonB. A.FolkC. L.CourtneyS. M. (2016). Neural mechanisms of goal-contingent task disengagement: Response-irrelevant stimuli activate the default mode network. Cortex, 81, 221–230.
10.
AndersonB. A.FolkC. L.GarrisonR.RogersL. (2016). Mechanisms of habitual approach: Failure to suppress irrelevant responses evoked by previously reward-associated stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 796–805.
11.
AndersonB. A.KronemerS. I.RileeJ. J.SacktorN.MarvelC. L. (2016). Reward, attention, and HIV-related risk in HIV+ individuals. Neurobiology of Disease, 92, 157–165.
12.
AndersonB. A.LaurentP. A.YantisS. (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 10367–10371.
AndersonB. A.LealS. L.HallM. G.YassaM. A.YantisS. (2014). The attribution of value-based attentional priority in individuals with depressive symptoms. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 1221–1227.
15.
CarpenterK. M.SchreiberE.ChurchS.McDowellD. (2006). Drug Stroop performance: Relationships with primary substance of use and treatment outcome in a drug-dependent outpatient sample. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 174–181.
16.
CarverC. S.WhiteT. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.
17.
ChristiansenP.SchoenmakersT. M.FieldM. (2015). Less than meets the eye: Reappraising the clinical relevance of attentional bias in addiction. Addictive Behaviors, 44, 43–50.
18.
FieldM.CoxW. M. (2008). Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 97, 1–20.
19.
FieldM.EastwoodB. (2005). Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol. Psychopharmacology, 183, 350–357.
20.
FreemanS. M.AronA. R. (2015). Withholding a reward-driven action: Studies of the rise and fall of motor activation and the effect of cognitive depletion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28, 237–251.
21.
FreemanS. M.RazhasI.AronA. R. (2014). Top-down response suppression mitigates action tendencies triggered by a motivating stimulus. Current Biology, 24, 212–216.
22.
HickeyC.ChelazziL.TheeuwesJ. (2010). Reward guides vision when it’s your thing: Trait reward-seeking in reward-mediated visual priming. PLoS ONE, 5, e14087. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014087
23.
ItthipuripatS.ChaK.RangsipatN.SerencesJ. T. (2015). Value-based attentional capture influences context dependent decision-making. Journal of Neurophysiology, 114, 560–569.
24.
KrebsR. M.BoehlerC. N.EgnerT.WoldorffM. G. (2011). The neural underpinnings of how reward associations can both guide and misguide attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 9752–9759.
25.
KrebsR. M.BoehlerC. N.WoldorffM. G. (2010). The influence of reward associations on conflict processing in the Stroop task. Cognition, 117, 341–347.
26.
LouieK.GrattanL. E.GlimcherP. W. (2011). Reward value-based gain control: Divisive normalization in parietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 10627–10639.
27.
LouieK.KhawM. W.GlimcherP. W. (2013). Normalization is a general neural mechanism for context-dependent decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 6139–6144.
28.
MarissenM. A. E.FrankenI. H. A.WatersA. J.BlankenP.van den BrinkW.HendriksV. M. (2006). Attentional bias predicts heroin relapse following treatment. Addiction, 101, 1306–1312.
29.
MoherJ.AndersonB. A.SongJ.-H. (2015). Dissociable effects of salience on attention and goal-directed action. Current Biology, 25, 2040–2046.
30.
Muhle-KarbeP. S.KrebsR. M. (2012). On the influence of reward on action-effect binding. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 450.
31.
NavalpakkamV.KochC.RangelA.PeronaP. (2010). Optimal reward harvesting in complex perceptual environments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 5232–5237.
32.
PoolE.BroschT.DelplanqueS.SanderD. (2014). Where is the chocolate? Rapid spatial orienting toward stimuli associated with primary reward. Cognition, 130, 348–359.
33.
QiS.ZengQ.DingC.LiH. (2013). Neural correlates of reward-driven attentional capture in visual search. Brain Research, 1532, 32–43.
34.
RangelA.ClitheroJ. A. (2012). Value normalization in decision making: Theory and evidence. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22, 970–981.
35.
RideoutV. J.FoehrU. G.RobertsD. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8–18 year olds. Menlo Park, CA: Keiser Family Foundation.
36.
San MartinR.AppelbaumL. G.HuettelS. A.WoldorffM. G. (2016). Cortical brain activity reflecting attentional biasing toward reward-predicting cues covaries with economic decision-making performance. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 1–11.
