Experiments involving dog-human social cognition have shown dogs’ close attention to human behavioral cues. Dogs remained near a fallen owner, avoided a deceptive human, and preferred a human that provided valid information about the location of a reward over an uninformative human. On the other hand, dogs showed no evidence of going for help in an emergency, having theory of mind or metacognition, or performing successive numerical discrimination. When tested for spatial memory and simultaneous numerical discrimination, dogs showed evidence of these abilities but also showed lower performance levels than found in other species.
FeuerbacherE. N.WynneC. D. L. (2011). (See References). A good review of the use of dogs in psychological research during the 20th century.
2.
MiklósiÁ. (2014). (See References). A thorough review of contemporary research on dog cognition.
3.
BeattyW. W.ShavaliaD. A. (1980). Spatial memory in rats: Time course of working memory and effect of anesthetics. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 28, 454–462.
4.
BeranM. J. (2001). Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 181–191.
5.
BeranM. J.BeranM. M. (2004). Chimpanzees remember the results of one-by-one addition of food items to sets over extended time periods. Psychological Science, 15, 94–99.
6.
CornuJ. N.Cancel-TassinG.OndetV.GirardetC.CussenotO. (2011). Olfactory detection of prostate cancer by dogs sniffing urine: A step forward in early diagnosis. European Urology, 59, 197–201.
7.
CraigM.RandJ.MeschR.Shyan-NorwaltM.MortonJ.FlickingerE. (2012). Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and the radial arm maze: Spatial memory and serial position effects. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126, 233–242.
8.
DarleyJ. M.LatanéB. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4, Pt. 1), 377–383.
9.
FeuerbacherE. N.WynneC. D. L. (2011). A history of dogs as subjects in North American experimental psychological research. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 6, 46–71.
10.
FischerP.KruegerJ.GreitemeyerT.VogrincicC.KastenmullerA.FreyD.. . . KainbacherM. (2011). The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 517–537.
11.
FrankH. (1980). Evolution of canine information processing under conditions of natural and artificial selection. Zeitschrift Für Tierpsychologie, 53, 389–399.
12.
FrankH.FrankM. G. (1982). Comparison of problem-solving performance in six-week-old wolves and dogs. Animal Behaviour, 30, 95–98.
13.
FrankH.FrankM. G. (1983). Inhibition training in wolves and dogs. Behavioural Processes, 8, 363–377.
14.
MacphersonK.RobertsW. A. (2006). Do dogs (Canis familiaris) seek help in an emergency?Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120, 113–119.
15.
MacphersonK.RobertsW. A. (2010). Spatial memory in dogs (Canis familiaris) on a radial maze. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 124, 47–56.
16.
MacphersonK.RobertsW. A. (2013). Can dogs count?Learning and Motivation, 44, 241–251.
17.
McMahonS.MacphersonK.RobertsW. A. (2010). Dogs choose a human informant: Metacognition in canines. Behavioural Processes, 85, 293–298.
18.
MiklósiÁ. (2014). Dog behaviour, evolution, and cognition. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
19.
NiederA.DiesterI.TudusciucO. (2006). Temporal and spatial enumeration processes in the primate parietal cortex. Science, 313, 1431–1435.
20.
OltonD. S.SamuelsonR. J. (1976). Remembrance of places passed: Spatial memory in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 97–116.
21.
PetrazziniM. E. M.WynneC. D. (2016). What counts for dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) in a quantity discrimination task?Behavioural Processes, 122, 90–97.
22.
PetterM.MusolinoE.RobertsW. A.ColeM. (2009). Can dogs (Canis familiaris) detect human deception?Behavioural Processes, 82, 109–118.
23.
PickelD.ManucyG. P.WalkerD. B.HallS. B.WalkerJ. C. (2004). Evidence for canine olfactory detection of melanoma. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 89, 107–116.
24.
PollingerJ. P.LohmuellerK. E.HanE.ParkerH. G.QuignonP.DegenhardtJ. D.. . . BryeK. (2010). Genome-wide SNP and haplotype analyses reveal a rich history underlying dog domestication. Nature, 464, 898–902.
25.
RobertsW. A.Van VeldhuizenN. (1985). Spatial memory in pigeons on the radial maze. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 241–260.
26.
RomanesG. J. (1882). The International Scientific Series: Animal intelligence. London, England: Kegan Paul, Trench.
27.
StaubE. (1970). A child in distress: The influence of age and number of witnesses on children’s attempts to help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 130–140.
28.
UdellM. A.DoreyN. R.WynneC. D. (2008). Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues. Animal Behaviour, 76, 1767–1773.
29.
UtrataE.VirányiZ.RangeF. (2012). Quantity discrimination in wolves (Canis lupus). Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 505. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00505
30.
WellsD. L. (2007). Domestic dogs and human health: An overview. British Journal of Health Psychology, 12, 145–156.
31.
WillisC. M.ChurchS. M.GuestC. M.CookW. A.McCarthyN.BransburyA. J.. . . ChurchJ. C. (2004). Olfactory detection of human bladder cancer by dogs: Proof of principle study. British Medical Journal, 329(7468), Article 712. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7468.712
