Retrieving information can result in the forgetting of related information, a phenomenon referred to as retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF). To date, the dominant explanation of RIF has been an inhibition account, which emphasizes long-term suppression of interfering memories. As one alternative, some have advocated for a strength-based interference account, which emphasizes the role of strengthening associations. More recently, we have proposed a context account, which emphasizes the role of context change and context reinstatement. In this article, we outline these three accounts of RIF and demonstrate that there is substantial evidence that uniquely supports our context account.
AndersonM. C. (2003). (See References). A theoretical article detailing the fundamental assumptions of the inhibition account.
2.
JonkerT. R.SeliP.MacLeodC. M. (2013). (See References). A theoretical article setting out our context account and reviewing the majority of the RIF literature as it applies to that account.
3.
MurayamaK.MiyatsuT.BuchliD.StormB. C. (2014). (See References). A meta-analytic review of RIF, focusing on the data relevant to the inhibition account.
4.
RaaijmakersJ. G. W.JakabE. (2013a). (See References). An article that reviews tests of the inhibition account and argues in support of the strength-based interference account.
5.
AndersonM. C. (2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanism of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 415–445.
6.
AndersonM. C.BellT. (2001). Forgetting our facts: The role of inhibitory processes in the loss of propositional knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 544–570.
7.
AndersonM. C.BjorkR. A.BjorkE. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063–1087.
8.
AndersonM. C.HanslmayrS. (2014). Neural mechanisms of motivated forgetting. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 279–292.
9.
AndersonM. C.LevyB. J. (2009). Suppressing unwanted memories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 189–194.
10.
CampG.PecherD.SchmidtH. G.ZeelenbergR. (2009). Are independent probes truly independent?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 934–942.
11.
DivisK. M.BenjaminA. S. (2014). Retrieval speeds context fluctuation: Why semantic generation enhances later learning but hinders prior learning. Memory & Cognition. Advance online publication. doi:1-.3758/s13421-014-0425-y
12.
GardinerJ. M.CraikF. I. M.BirtwistleJ. (1972). Retrieval cues and release from proactive inhibition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 778–783.
13.
JakabE.RaaijmakersJ. G. W. (2009). The role of item strength in retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 607–617.
14.
JangY.HuberD. E. (2008). Context retrieval and context change in free recall: Recalling from long-term memory drives list isolation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 112–127.
15.
JonkerT. R.MacLeodC. M. (2012). Retrieval-induced forgetting: Testing the competition assumption of inhibition theory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 204–211.
16.
JonkerT. R.SeliP.MacLeodC. M. (2012). Less we forget: Retrieval cues and release from retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 40, 1236–1245.
17.
JonkerT. R.SeliP.MacLeodC. M. (2013). Putting retrieval-induced forgetting in context: An inhibition-free, context-based account. Psychological Review, 120, 852–872.
18.
MensinkG.-J.RaaijmakersJ. G. W. (1988). A model for interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 94, 434–455.
19.
MurayamaK.MiyatsuT.BuchliD.StormB. C. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval: A meta-analytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1383–1409.
20.
PolynS. M.NormanK. A.KahanaM. J. (2009). A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 116, 129–156.
21.
RaaijmakersJ. G. W.JakabE. (2012). Retrieval induced forgetting without competition: Testing the retrieval-specificity assumption of inhibition theory. Memory & Cognition, 40, 19–27.
22.
RaaijmakersJ. G. W.JakabE. (2013a). Is forgetting caused by inhibition?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 205–209.
23.
RaaijmakersJ. G. W.JakabE. (2013b). Rethinking inhibition theory: On the problematic status of the inhibition theory of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 98–122.
24.
SahakyanL.HendricksH. E. (2012). Context change and retrieval difficulty in the list-before-the-last paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 40, 844–860.
25.
SahakyanL.KelleyC. M. (2002). A contextual change account of the directed forgetting effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1064–1072.
26.
SmithS. M.ManzanoI. (2010). Video context-dependent recall. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 292–301.
27.
SorianoM. F.JiménezJ. F.RománP.BajoM. T. (2009). Inhibitory processes in memory are impaired in schizophrenia: Evidence from retrieval induced forgetting. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 661–673.
28.
StormB. C.LevyB. J. (2012). A progress report on the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 40, 827–843.
29.
VerdeM. F. (2013). Retrieval-induced forgetting in recall: Competitor interference revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1433–1448.
