This article addresses generalized trust, a construct that is examined in various scientific disciplines and assumed to be of central importance to understanding the functioning of individuals, groups, and society at large. We share four basic lessons on trust: (a) Generalized trust is more a matter of culture than genetics; (b) trust is deeply rooted in social interaction experiences (that go beyond childhood), networks, and media; (c) people have too little trust in other people in general; and (d) it is adaptive to regulate a “healthy dose” of generalized trust. Each of these lessons is inspired and illustrated by recent research from different scientific disciplines.
BallietD.Van LangeP. A. M. (2013a). (See References). A meta-analytic article that provides a theoretical review of the link between trust and cooperation.
2.
PutnamR. (2000). (See References). A book that is a classic analysis of the disconnection and reconnection of social relations in America.
3.
SimpsonJ. A. (2007). (See References). A review that provides a very informative, concisely written overview of research on trust.
4.
AlfordJ. R.FunkC. L.HibbingJ. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted?American Political Science Review, 99, 153–167.
5.
AllisonS. T.MessickD. M.GoethalsG. R. (1989). On being better but not smarter than others: The Muhammad Ali effect. Social Cognition, 7, 275–296.
6.
BallietD.Van LangeP. A. M. (2013a). Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1090–1112.
7.
BallietD.Van LangeP. A. M. (2013b). Trust, punishment, and cooperation across 18 societies: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 363–379.
8.
BarefootJ. C.MaynardK. E.BeckhamJ. C.BrummettB. H.HookerK.SieglerI. C. (1998). Trust, health, and longevity. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 517–626.
9.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370.
10.
BekkersR. (2012). Trust and volunteering: Selection or causation? Evidence from a 4 year panel study. Political Psychology, 32, 225–247.
11.
BoomsmaD. I.de GeusE. J.VinkJ. M.StubbeJ. H.DistelM. A.HottengaJ. J.. . . WillemsenG. (2006). Netherlands Twin Register: From twins to twin families. Twin Research Human Genetics, 9, 849–857.
12.
CarterN. L.WeberM. (2010). Not Pollyannas: Higher generalized trust predicts lie detection ability. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 1, 274–279.
13.
CesariniD.DawesC. T.FowlerJ. F.JohannessonM.LichtensteinP.WallaceB. (2008). Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 3721–3726.
14.
CookK. S.HardinR.LeviM. (2005). Cooperation without trust?New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
DinesenP. T. (2012). Does generalized (dis)trust travel? Examining the impact of cultural heritage and destination country environment on trust of immigrants. Political Psychology, 33, 495–511.
16.
DunningD.AndersonJ. E.SchlosserT.EhlebrachtD.FetchenauerD. (2014). Trust at zero acquaintance: More a matter of respect than expectation of reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 122–141.
17.
FetchenhauerD.DunningD. (2009). Do people trust too much or too little?Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 263–276.
18.
FukuyamaF. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York, NY: Free Press Paperbacks.
19.
HiraishiK.YamagataS.ShikishimaC.AndoJ. (2008). Maintenance of genetic variation in personality through control of mental mechanisms: A test of trust, extraversion, and agreeableness. Evolution & Human Behavior, 29, 79–85.
20.
HolmesJ. G.RempelJ. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In HendrickC. (Ed.), Close relationships (pp. 187–220). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
KendlerK. S.BakerJ. H. (2007). Genetic influences on measures of the environment: A systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 37, 615–626.
22.
MikulincerM. (1998). Attachment working models and the sense of trust: An exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1209–1224.
23.
MillerD. T.RatnerR. K. (1998). The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 53–62.
24.
NannestadP. (2008). What have we learned about generalized trust, if anything?Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 413–436.
25.
NowakM. A.SigmundK. (2005). Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature, 437, 1291–1298.
26.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
27.
RotterJ. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651–665.
28.
RousseauD. M.SitkinS. B.BurtR. S.CamererC. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.
29.
RusbultC. E.Van LangeP. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351–375.
30.
SchneiderI. K.KonijnE. A.RighettiF.RusbultC. E. (2011). A healthy dose of trust: The relationship between trust and health. Personal Relationships, 78, 668–676.
31.
SimpsonJ. A. (2007). Psychological foundations of trust. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 264–268.
32.
SturgisP.ReadS.HatemiP. K.ZhuG.TrullT. J.WrightM. J.MartinN. G. (2010). A genetic basis for social trust?Political Behavior, 32, 205–230.
33.
TurkheimerE. (2000). Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 160–164.
34.
UslanerE. (2010). Corruption, inequality, and the rule of law. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Van LangeP. A. M.JoiremanJ.ParksC. D.Van DijkE. (2013). The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 125–141.
36.
Van LangeP. A. M.OuwerkerkJ. W.TazelaarM. J. A. (2002). How to overcome the detrimental effects of noise in social interaction: The benefits of generosity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 768–780.
37.
Van LangeP. A. M.SedikidesC. (1998). Being more honest but not necessarily more intelligent than others: Generality and explanations for the Muhammad Ali effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 675–680.
VuoleviJ. H. K.Van LangeP. A. M. (2010). Beyond the information given: The power of the belief in self-interest. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 26–34.
40.
VuoleviJ. H. K.Van LangeP. A. M. (2012). Boundaries of reciprocity: Incompleteness of information undermines cooperation. Acta Psychologica, 141, 67–72.
41.
YamagishiT. (2011). Trust: The evolutionary game of mind and society. New York, NY: Springer.
