Informed decision making requires that people understand health risks. Unfortunately, many people are not risk literate and are biased by common risk communication practices. In this article, we review a collection of studies investigating the benefits of visual aids for communicating health risks to diverse vulnerable people (e.g., varying in abilities, ages, risk characteristics, and cultural backgrounds). These studies show that appropriately designed visual aids are often highly effective, transparent, and ethically desirable tools for improving decision making, changing attitudes, and reducing risky behavior. Theoretical mechanisms, open questions, and emerging applications are discussed.
AnckerJ. S.SenathirajahY.KukafkaR.StarrenJ. B. (2006). Design features of graphs in health risk communication: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13, 608–618.
2.
AnckerJ. S.WeberE. U.KukafkaR. (2011). Effect of arrangement of stick figures on estimates of proportion in risk graphics. Medical Decision Making, 31, 143–150.
3.
CarpenterP. A.ShahP. (1998). A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 75–100.
4.
CokelyE. T.GalesicM.SchulzE.GhazalS.Garcia-RetameroR. (2012). Measuring risk literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 25–47.
5.
CokelyE. T.KelleyC. M. (2009). Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 20–33.
6.
CoxD. S.CoxA. D.SturmL.ZimetG. (2010). Behavioral interventions to increase HPV vaccination acceptability among mothers of young girls. Health Psychology, 29, 29–39.
7.
FagerlinA.WangC.UbelP. A. (2005). Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people’s health care decisions: Is a picture worth a thousand statistics?Medical Decision Making, 25, 398–405.
8.
Feldman-StewartD.BrennenstuhlS.McIsaacK.AustokerJ.CharvetA.HewitsonP.WhelanT. (2007). A systematic review of information in decision aids. Health Expectations, 10, 46–61.
9.
Feldman-StewartD.BrundageM. D.ZotovV. (2007). Further insight into the perception of quantitative information: Judgments of gist in treatment decisions. Medical Decision Making, 27, 34–43.
10.
FinucaneM. L.SlovicP.HibbardJ. H.PetersE.MertzC. K.MacgregorD. G. (2002). Aging and decision-making competence: An analysis of comprehension and consistency skills in older versus younger adults considering health-plan options. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 141–164.
11.
GaissmaierW.WegwarthO.SkopecD.MüllerA.BroschinskiS.PolitiM. C. (2012). Numbers can be worth a thousand pictures: Individual differences in understanding graphical and numerical representations of health-related information. Health Psychology, 31, 286–296.
12.
GalesicM.Garcia-RetameroR. (2010). Statistical numeracy for health: A cross-cultural comparison with probabilistic national samples. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170, 462–468.
13.
GalesicM.Garcia-RetameroR. (2011a). Do low-numeracy people avoid shared decision making?Health Psychology, 30, 336–341.
14.
GalesicM.Garcia-RetameroR. (2011b). Graph literacy: A cross-cultural comparison. Medical Decision Making, 31, 444–457.
15.
GalesicM.Garcia-RetameroR. (2013). Using analogies to communicate information about medical treatments and screenings. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 33–42.
16.
GalesicM.Garcia-RetameroR.GigerenzerG. (2009). Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: Overcoming low numeracy. Health Psychology, 28, 210–216.
17.
Garcia-RetameroR.CokelyE. T. (2011). Effective communication of risks to young adults: Using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 270–287.
18.
Garcia-RetameroR.CokelyE. (in press a). The influence of skills, message frame, and visual aids on prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.
19.
Garcia-RetameroR.CokelyE. T. (in press b). Simple but powerful health messages for increasing condom use in young adults. Journal of Sex Research.
20.
Garcia-RetameroR.DhamiM. K. (2011). Pictures speak louder than numbers: On communicating medical risks to immigrants with limited non-native language proficiency. Health Expectations, 14, 46–57.
21.
Garcia-RetameroR.GalesicM. (2009). Communicating treatment risk reduction to people with low numeracy skills: A cross-cultural comparison. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 2196–2202.
22.
Garcia-RetameroR.GalesicM. (2010). Who profits from visual aids: Overcoming challenges in people’s understanding of risks. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 1019–1025.
23.
Garcia-RetameroR.GalesicM. (2013). Transparent communication of health risks: Overcoming cultural differences. New York, NY: Springer.
24.
Garcia-RetameroR.GalesicM.GigerenzerG. (2010). Do icon arrays help reduce denominator neglect?Medical Decision Making, 30, 672–684.
25.
Garcia-RetameroR.HoffrageU. (2013). Visual representation of statistical information improves diagnostic inferences in doctors and their patients. Social Science & Medicine, 83, 27–33.
26.
GigerenzerG.GaissmaierW.Kurz-MilckeE.SchwartzL. M.WoloshinS. (2007). Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 53–96.
27.
GillanD. J.WickensC. D.HollandsJ. G.CarswellC. M. (1998). Guidelines for presenting quantitative data in HFES publications. Human Factors, 40, 28–41.
28.
Goodyear-SmithF.ArrollB.ChanL.JacksonR.WellsS.KenealyT. (2008). Patients prefer pictures to numbers to express cardiovascular benefit from treatment. Annals of Family Medicine, 6, 213–217.
29.
GromanR.GinsburgJ., & the American College of Physicians. (2004). Racial and ethnic disparities in health care: A position paper of the American college of physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine, 141, 226–232.
30.
HawleyS. T.Zikmund-FisherB.UbelP.JancovicA.LucasT.FagerlinA. (2008). The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. Patient Education and Counseling, 73, 448–455.
JamesX.HawkinsA.RowelR. (2007). An assessment of the cultural appropriateness of emergency preparedness communication for low income minorities. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 4, 1–24.
33.
KellerC.SiegristM. (2009). Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy. Medical Decision Making, 29, 483–490.
34.
KutnerM.GreenbergE.JinY.PaulsenC. (2006). The health literacy of America’s adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006–483). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
35.
LipkusI. M. (2007). Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: Suggested best practices and future recommendations. Medical Decision Making, 27, 696–713.
36.
LloydF. J.ReynaV. F. (2001). A web exercise in evidence-based medicine using cognitive theory. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 94–99.
37.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2012). PISA 2009 technical report. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264167872-en
38.
OkanY.Garcia-RetameroR.CokelyE. T.MaldonadoA. (2012). Individual differences in graph literacy: Overcoming denominator neglect in risk comprehension. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 390–401.
39.
PetersE. (2012). Beyond comprehension: The role of numeracy in judgment and decisions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 31–35.
40.
PetersE.DieckmannN. F.VästfjällD.MertzC. K.SlovicP.HibbardJ. (2009). Bringing meaning to numbers: The impact of evaluative categories on decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 213–227.
41.
ReynaV. F. (2004). How people make decisions that involve risk. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 60–66.
42.
ReynaV. F.BrainerdC. J. (2008). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 89–107.
43.
ReynaV. F.NelsonW. L.HanP.DieckmannN. F. (2009). How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 943–973.
44.
RothmanA. J.MartinoS. C.BedellB. T.DetweilerJ. B.SaloveyP. (1999). The systematic influence of gain- and loss-framed messages on interest in and use of different types of health behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1355–1369.
45.
SchirilloJ. A.StoneE. R. (2005). The greater ability of graphical versus numerical displays to increase risk avoidance involves a common mechanism. Risk Analysis, 25, 555–566.
46.
SlovicP.PetersE. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 322–325.
47.
StoneE. R.SieckW. R.BullB. E.YatesJ. F.ParksS. C.RushC. J. (2003). Foreground: Background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 19–36.
48.
TrevenaL.Zikmund-FisherB.EdwardsA.GaissmaierW.GalesicM.HanP.WoloshinS. (2012). Presenting probabilities. In VolkR.Llewellyn-ThomasH. (Eds.), Update of the international patient decision aids standards (IPDAS) collaboration’s background document (Chapter C). Retrieved from http://ipdas.ohri.ca/IPDAS-Chapter-C.pdf
49.
VolzK. G.GigerenzerG. (2012). Cognitive processes in decision under risk are not the same as in decision under uncertainty. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 105.
50.
WatersE. A.WeinsteinN. D.ColditzG. A.EmmonsK. M. (2007). Reducing aversion to side effects in preventive medical treatment decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 11–21.
51.
Woller-CarterM.OkanY.CokelyE. T.Garcia-RetameroR. (2012). Communicating risks with graphs: An eye-tracking study. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56, 1723–1727.
52.
Zikmund-FisherB. J.FagerlinA.UbelP. A. (2008). Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics. Cancer, 113, 3382–3390.
