Research efforts to account for elevated risk behavior among adolescents have arrived at an exciting new stage. Moving beyond laboratory studies of age differences in risk perception and reasoning, new approaches have shifted their focus to the influence of social and emotional factors on adolescent decision making. We review recent research suggesting that adolescent risk-taking propensity derives in part from a maturational gap between early adolescent remodeling of the brain’s socioemotional reward system and a gradual, prolonged strengthening of the cognitive-control system. Research has suggested that in adolescence, a time when individuals spend an increasing amount of time with their peers, peer-related stimuli may sensitize the reward system to respond to the reward value of risky behavior. As the cognitive-control system gradually matures over the course of the teenage years, adolescents grow in their capacity to coordinate affect and cognition and to exercise self-regulation, even in emotionally arousing situations. These capacities are reflected in gradual growth in the capacity to resist peer influence.
AlbertD.O’BrienL.DiSorboA.UckertK.EganD. E.CheinJ.SteinbergL. (2009, April). Peer influences on risk taking in young adulthood. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Denver, CO.
2.
AlbertD.SteinbergL. (2011). Peer influences on adolescent risk behavior. In BardoM. T.FishbeinD. H.MilichR. (Eds.), Inhibitory control and drug abuse prevention: From research to translation (pp. 211–228). New York, NY: Springer.
3.
BaumanK. E.EnnettS. E. (1996). On the importance of peer influence for adolescent drug use: Commonly neglected considerations. Addiction, 91, 185–198.
4.
BrownB. B.LarsonJ. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescents. In SteinbergR. M. L. (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology, Contextual influences on adolescent development (Vol. 2, 3rd ed., pp. 74–103). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
5.
BurnettS.SebastianC.Cohen KadoshK.BlakemoreS. J. (2011). The social brain in adolescence: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging and behavioural studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1654–1664.
6.
CheinJ.AlbertD.O’BrienL.UckertK.SteinbergL. (2011). Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain’s reward circuitry. Developmental Science, 14, F1–F10.
7.
DishionT. J.BullockB. M.GranicI. (2002). Pragmatism in modeling peer influence: Dynamics, outcomes, and change processes. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 969–981.
8.
Doremus-FitzwaterT. L.VarlinskayaE. I.SpearL. P. (2010). Motivational systems in adolescence: Possible implications for age differences in substance abuse and other risk-taking behaviors. Brain and Cognition, 72, 114–123.
9.
FalkE. G.WayB. M.JasinskaA. J. (2012). An imaging genetics approach to understanding social influence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1–13.
10.
GalvanA. (2010). Adolescent development of the reward system. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 1–9.
11.
GardnerM.SteinbergL. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41, 625–635.
12.
InselT.FernaldR. (2004). How the brain processes social information: Searching for the social brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 697–722.
13.
LightfootC. (1997). The culture of adolescent risk-taking. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
LunaB.PadmanabhanA.O’HearnK. (2010). What has fMRI told us about the development of cognitive control through adolescence?Brain and Cognition, 72, 101–113.
16.
O’BrienL.AlbertD.CheinJ.SteinbergL. (2011). Adolescents prefer more immediate rewards when in the presence of their peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 747–753.
17.
PfeiferJ. H.MastenC. L.MooreW. E.OswaldT. M.IacoboniM.MazziottaJ. C.DaprettoM. (2011). Entering adolescence: Resistance to peer influence, risky behavior, and neural changes in emotional reactivity. Neuron, 69, 1029–1036.
18.
ReynaV. F.FarleyF. (2006). Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making: Implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 1–44.
19.
SchmithorstV. J.YuanW. H. (2010). White matter development during adolescence as shown by diffusion MRI. Brain and Cognition, 72, 16–25.
20.
SegalowitzS. J.SantessoD. L.WilloughbyT.RekerD. L.CampbellK.ChalmersH.Rose-KrasnorL. (2012). Adolescent peer interaction and trait surgency weaken medial prefrontal cortex responses to failure. Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 115–124.
21.
SmithA.CheinJ.SteinbergL. (2011, November). Developmental differences in reward processing in the presence of peers. Paper presented at the 42nd annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC.
22.
SomervilleL. H. (2013). The teenage brain: Sensitivity to social evaluation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 121–127.
23.
SomervilleL. H.HareT. A.CaseyB. J. (2011). Frontostriatal maturation predicts cognitive control failure to appetitive cues in adolescents. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2123–2134.
24.
SpearL. P. (2009). The behavioral neuroscience of adolescence. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
25.
SteinbergL. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78–106.
26.
SteinbergL.MonahanK. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1531–1543.
27.
StevensM. C. (2009). The developmental cognitive neuroscience of functional connectivity. Brain and Cognition, 70, 1–12.
28.
WeigardA.CheinJ.SteinbergL. (2011, May). Influence of anonymous peers on risk-taking behavior in adolescents. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Stanford Undergraduate Psychology Conference, Stanford, CA.
29.
WinkielmanP.BerridgeK. C.WilbargerJ. L. (2005). Unconscious affective reactions to masked happy versus angry faces influence consumption behavior and judgments of value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 121–135.
30.
WinkielmanP.KnutsonB.PaulusM. P.TrujilloJ. L. (2007). Affective influence on judgments and decisions: Moving towards core mechanisms. Review of General Psychology, 11, 179–192.
31.
ZimringF. (1998). American youth violence: Studies in crime and public policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
