Our mental processing of the visual world is not independent of our physical actions within it. Placing objects near one’s hands and interacting with objects using tools can enhance visual perception, bias and prolong the allocation of attention, and distort memory in systematic ways. This suggests that the world within our reach is cognitively different from the world beyond reach. In this review, we examine the evidence supporting this conclusion, focusing on the cognitive and neural mechanisms that underlie these effects, the parameters that may control their emergence, and their potential practical applications.
AbramsR. A.DavoliC. C.DuF.KnappW. K.PaullD. (2008). Altered vision near the hands. Cognition, 107, 1035–1047.
2.
AdamJ.Bovend’EertT.van DoorenF.FischerM.PrattJ. (in press). The closer the better: Hand proximity dynamically affects letter recognition accuracy. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
3.
BertiA.FrassinettiF. (2000). When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 415–420.
4.
BirminghamE.RisticJ.KingstoneA. (2012). Investigating social attention: A case for increasing stimulus complexity in the laboratory (pp. 251–276). In BurackJ. A.EnnsJ. T.FoxN. A.(Eds.), Cognitive science, development, and psychopathology. Oxford University Press.
5.
BloeschE. K.DavoliC. C.RothN.BrockmoleJ. R.AbramsR. A. (2012). Watch this! Observed tool use affects perceived distance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 177–183.
6.
BrockmoleJ. R.DavoliC. C.CroninD. A. (2012). The visual world in sight and mind: How attention and memory interact to determine visual experience. In RossB. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 57, pp. 103–145). London, England: Elsevier.
7.
CosmanJ. D.VeceraS. P. (2010). Attention affects visual perceptual processing near the hand. Psychological Science, 21, 1254–1258.
8.
DavoliC. C.AbramsR. A. (2009). Reaching out with the imagination. Psychological Science, 20, 293–295.
9.
DavoliC. C.BrockmoleJ. R. (2012). The hands shield attention from visual interference. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1386–1390.
10.
DavoliC. C.BrockmoleJ. R.DuF.AbramsR. A. (2012). Switching between global and local scopes of attention is resisted near the hands. Visual Cognition, 20, 659–668.
11.
DavoliC. C.BrockmoleJ. R.GoujonA. (2012). A bias to detail: How hand position modulates visual learning and visual memory. Memory & Cognition, 40, 352–359.
12.
DavoliC. C.BrockmoleJ. R.WittJ. K. (2012). Compressing perceived distance with remote tool-use: Real, imagined, and remembered. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 80–89.
13.
DavoliC. C.DuF.MontanaJ.GarverickS.AbramsR. A. (2010). When meaning matters, look but don’t touch: The effects of posture on reading. Memory & Cognition, 38, 555–562.
14.
di PellegrinoG.FrassinettiF. (2000). Direct evidence from parietal extinction of enhancement of visual attention near a visible hand. Current Biology, 10, 1475–1477.
15.
DrewsF. A.YazdaniH.GodfreyC. N.CooperJ. M.StrayerD. L. (2009). Text messaging during simulated driving. Human Factors, 51, 762–770.
16.
FarneA.IrikiA.LadavasE. (2005). Shaping multisensory action-space with tools: Evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia, 43, 238–248.
17.
GoodhewS.GozliD. G.FerberS.PrattJ. (in press). Reduced temporal fusion in near-hand space. Psychological Science.
18.
GozliD. G.WestG.PrattJ. (in press). Hand position alters vision by biasing processing through different visual pathways. Cognition.
19.
GrazianoM. S. A. (2001). Is reaching eye-centered, body-centered, hand-centered, or a combination?Reviews in the Neurosciences, 12, 175–186.
20.
GrazianoM. S. A.CookeD. F. (2006). Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia, 44, 845–859.
21.
HommelB.MusselerJ.AscherslebenG.PrinzW. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.
22.
IrikiA.TanakaM.IwamuraY. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. NeuroReport, 7, 2325–2330.
23.
LeeY.LeeS.CarelloC.TurveyM. T. (2012). An archer’s perceived form scales the “hitableness” of archery targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1125–1131.
24.
LinkenaugerS. A.RamenzoniV.ProffittD. R. (2010). Illusory shrinkage and growth: Body-based rescaling affects the perception of size. Psychological Science, 21, 1318–1325.
25.
LotanM.GoldC.Yalon-ChamovitzS. (2009). Reducing challenging behavior through structured therapeutic intervention in the controlled multi-sensory environment (Snoezelen): Ten case studies. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 8, 377–392.
26.
MaravitaA.HusainM.ClarkeK.DriverJ. (2001). Reaching with a tool extends visual–tactile interactions into far space: Evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia, 39, 580–585.
27.
MinogueJ.JonesM. G. (2006). Haptics in education: Exploring an untapped sensory modality. Review of Educational Research, 76, 317–348.
28.
ProffittD. R.LinkenaugerS. A. (in press). Perception viewed as a phenotypic expression. In PrinzW.BeisertM.HerwigA. (Eds.), Tutorials in action science. MIT Press.
29.
QianC.Al-AidroosN.WestG.AbramsR.PrattJ. (2012). The visual P2 is attenuated for attended objects near the hands. Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 95–104.
30.
ReedC. L.BetzR.GarzaJ. P.RobertsR. J. (2010). Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 236–245.
31.
ReedC. L.GrubbJ. D.SteeleC. (2006). Hands up: Attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 166–177.
32.
RichardsonD. C.DaleR.KirkhamN. Z. (2007). The art of conversation is coordination: Common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue. Psychological Science, 18, 407–413.
33.
RizzolattiG.CraigheroL. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.
34.
SamsonD.ApperlyI. A.BraithwaiteJ. J.AndrewsB. J.Bodley ScottS. E. (2010). Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1255–1266.
35.
SchendelK.RobertsonL. C. (2004). Reaching out to see: Arm position can attenuate human visual loss. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 935–943.
36.
SchultheisH.CarlsonL.AbramsR. A. (2010, August). Attention for action: Attentional modulation by the hands. Poster presented at the meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Portland, OR.
37.
ThomasL. E.DavoliC. C.BrockmoleJ. R. (in press). Interacting with objects compresses environmental representations in spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
VishtonP. M.StephensN. J.NelsonL. A.MorraS. E.BrunickK. L.StevensJ. A. (2007). Planning to reach for an object changes how the reacher perceives it. Psychological Science, 18, 713–719.
40.
WeidlerB. J.AbramsR. A. (2012, November). Enhanced and impaired processing of visual stimuli near the hands. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, MN.
41.
WelshT. N.LyonsJ.WeeksD. J.AnsonJ. G.ChuaR.MendozaJ.ElliottD. (2007). Within- and between-nervous-system inhibition of return: Observation is as good as performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 950–956.
42.
WittJ. K.BrockmoleJ. R. (2012). Action alters object identification: Wielding a gun increases the bias to see guns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1159–1167.
43.
WittJ. K.ProffittD. R. (2008). Action-specific influences on distance perception: A role for motor simulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1479–1492.
44.
WittJ. K.ProffittD. R.EpsteinW. (2005). Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 880–888.
WittJ. K.SugovicM.TaylorJ. E. T. (2012). Action-specific effects in a social context: Others’ abilities influence perceived speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 715–725.
